• An interesting VAR episode in Argentina

    From =?UTF-8?B?TGzDqW8=?=@24:150/2 to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Apr 15 00:42:33 2022
    It took long enough, but VAR has finally arrived in Argentina. Their original idea was to have it since the first semester of 2019, but it ended up being delayed by things like costs discussions and politics, and of course a worldwide pandemic didn't exactly help them on that front.
    Brasil uses VAR since 2018, and other local leagues already have it working, such as Uruguay, Paraguay, Ecuador, Chile and Colombia. But eventually, on March 31st, 2022, the eighth round of the league, VAR finally made its debut in Argentinian professional football.
    And 11 days into the VAR era, this happens: https://twitter.com/juans_perez/status/1513896713836191752?t=MJGarymjoDbLMPIkrHdDiQ&s=19
    If you don't want to click on the link above, here's what happens: Hurac|in is facing Barracas Central at their stadium, "El Palacio" Tom|is Adolfo Duc||. 87 minutes into the game, score is 1-1, Barracas lobs the ball into Hurac|in's penalty area and goalkeeper Marcos D|!az comes off to catch the cross. He then runs to the edge of the box and quickly releases it to a teammate. The commentator
    wonders, in passing, whether D|!az stepped outside the penalty area, but has no
    time for such musings, as Hurac|in mounts a quick counter-attack and, 10 seconds
    later, scores what seems to be the match's winning goal.
    Was it, though? Referee is called by VAR, goes to check it. D|!az had his feet and body inside the box, but arms are extended and his hands holding the ball can be clearly seen beyond the line. He was surrounded by three Barracas players
    at that moment, but things happened so fast that none of them seems to have noticed - indeed, none of them complained at the time. The decision is then made:
    no goal, a free kick to Barracas and a yellow card to the unfortunate D|!az.
    By now, I scarcely need to tell you what happened when Barracas took that free kick, right?
    Madness. I was reminded of this post, from the Best of RSS: http://www.rsssf.com/rssbest/Keepedge.html
    So it seems that in the past there was some leeway here, even if only informally
    so. Not anymore in the VAR Robots era, though.
    I guess that, strictly speaking, this isn't really a "controversy", since the ref indeed made a correct and sound call, in a technical sense. Hurac|in fans don't seem to have grounds to complain about anything but the fates. It still feels strange, though. It's hard to argue that the play wouldn't develop exactly
    like it did had D|!az released the ball a fraction of a second earlier (ie, while
    it still had a bit of it orthogonally projected over a part of the line). Then again, I suppose the same can be said about, say, every marginal offsides called
    in the history of the game.
    Regardless, surely an interesting night at Old Palace Duc||, a stadium that has
    once featured in an Academy Award winning movie* and now is the site of what was probably the first "big", result-reversing VAR call in the history of Argentinian football.
    --
    Ll|-o
    * "El Secreto de Tus Ojos", or "The Secret in Their Eyes" in English. The stadium scene is available on YouTube and, if you understand Spanish, the scene that leads into it is rather worthy as well.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Werner Pichler@24:150/2 to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Apr 15 09:28:08 2022
    On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 9:42:34 AM UTC+2, Ll|-o wrote:
    It took long enough, but VAR has finally arrived in Argentina. Their original
    idea was to have it since the first semester of 2019, but it ended up being delayed by things like costs discussions and politics, and of course a worldwide pandemic didn't exactly help them on that front.

    Brasil uses VAR since 2018, and other local leagues already have it working, such as Uruguay, Paraguay, Ecuador, Chile and Colombia. But eventually, on March 31st, 2022, the eighth round of the league, VAR finally made its debut in Argentinian professional football.

    And 11 days into the VAR era, this happens:

    https://twitter.com/juans_perez/status/1513896713836191752?t=MJGarymjoDbLMPIkrHdDiQ&s=19

    If you don't want to click on the link above, here's what happens: Hurac|in is
    facing Barracas Central at their stadium, "El Palacio" Tom|is Adolfo Duc||. 87
    minutes into the game, score is 1-1, Barracas lobs the ball into Hurac|in's penalty area and goalkeeper Marcos D|!az comes off to catch the cross. He then
    runs to the edge of the box and quickly releases it to a teammate. The commentator
    wonders, in passing, whether D|!az stepped outside the penalty area, but has no
    time for such musings, as Hurac|in mounts a quick counter-attack and, 10 seconds
    later, scores what seems to be the match's winning goal.

    Was it, though? Referee is called by VAR, goes to check it. D|!az had his feet
    and body inside the box, but arms are extended and his hands holding the ball
    can be clearly seen beyond the line. He was surrounded by three Barracas players
    at that moment, but things happened so fast that none of them seems to have noticed - indeed, none of them complained at the time. The decision is then made:
    no goal, a free kick to Barracas and a yellow card to the unfortunate D|!az.

    By now, I scarcely need to tell you what happened when Barracas took that free
    kick, right?

    Madness. I was reminded of this post, from the Best of RSS:

    http://www.rsssf.com/rssbest/Keepedge.html

    So it seems that in the past there was some leeway here, even if only informally
    so. Not anymore in the VAR Robots era, though.

    I guess that, strictly speaking, this isn't really a "controversy", since the
    ref indeed made a correct and sound call, in a technical sense. Hurac|in fans
    don't seem to have grounds to complain about anything but the fates. It still
    feels strange, though. It's hard to argue that the play wouldn't develop exactly
    like it did had D|!az released the ball a fraction of a second earlier (ie, while
    it still had a bit of it orthogonally projected over a part of the line). Then
    again, I suppose the same can be said about, say, every marginal offsides called
    in the history of the game.

    Regardless, surely an interesting night at Old Palace Duc||, a stadium that has
    once featured in an Academy Award winning movie* and now is the site of what was probably the first "big", result-reversing VAR call in the history of Argentinian football.
    Amazing!
    And yeah, you really can't argue about the calls.
    Ciao
    Werner

    --
    Ll|-o
    * "El Secreto de Tus Ojos", or "The Secret in Their Eyes" in English. The stadium scene is available on YouTube and, if you understand Spanish, the scene that leads into it is rather worthy as well.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Werner Pichler@24:150/2 to rec.sport.soccer on Fri Apr 15 09:31:30 2022
    On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 6:28:10 PM UTC+2, Werner Pichler wrote:
    On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 9:42:34 AM UTC+2, Ll|-o wrote:
    It took long enough, but VAR has finally arrived in Argentina. Their original
    idea was to have it since the first semester of 2019, but it ended up being
    delayed by things like costs discussions and politics, and of course a worldwide pandemic didn't exactly help them on that front.

    Brasil uses VAR since 2018, and other local leagues already have it working,
    such as Uruguay, Paraguay, Ecuador, Chile and Colombia. But eventually, on March 31st, 2022, the eighth round of the league, VAR finally made its debut
    in Argentinian professional football.

    And 11 days into the VAR era, this happens:

    https://twitter.com/juans_perez/status/1513896713836191752?t=MJGarymjoDbLMPIkrHdDiQ&s=19

    If you don't want to click on the link above, here's what happens: Hurac|in is
    facing Barracas Central at their stadium, "El Palacio" Tom|is Adolfo Duc||. 87
    minutes into the game, score is 1-1, Barracas lobs the ball into Hurac|in's
    penalty area and goalkeeper Marcos D|!az comes off to catch the cross. He then
    runs to the edge of the box and quickly releases it to a teammate. The commentator
    wonders, in passing, whether D|!az stepped outside the penalty area, but has no
    time for such musings, as Hurac|in mounts a quick counter-attack and, 10 seconds
    later, scores what seems to be the match's winning goal.

    Was it, though? Referee is called by VAR, goes to check it. D|!az had his feet
    and body inside the box, but arms are extended and his hands holding the ball
    can be clearly seen beyond the line. He was surrounded by three Barracas players
    at that moment, but things happened so fast that none of them seems to have
    noticed - indeed, none of them complained at the time. The decision is then made:
    no goal, a free kick to Barracas and a yellow card to the unfortunate D|!az.

    By now, I scarcely need to tell you what happened when Barracas took that free
    kick, right?

    Madness. I was reminded of this post, from the Best of RSS:

    http://www.rsssf.com/rssbest/Keepedge.html

    So it seems that in the past there was some leeway here, even if only informally
    so. Not anymore in the VAR Robots era, though.

    I guess that, strictly speaking, this isn't really a "controversy", since the
    ref indeed made a correct and sound call, in a technical sense. Hurac|in fans
    don't seem to have grounds to complain about anything but the fates. It still
    feels strange, though. It's hard to argue that the play wouldn't develop exactly
    like it did had D|!az released the ball a fraction of a second earlier (ie, while
    it still had a bit of it orthogonally projected over a part of the line). Then
    again, I suppose the same can be said about, say, every marginal offsides called
    in the history of the game.

    Regardless, surely an interesting night at Old Palace Duc||, a stadium that has
    once featured in an Academy Award winning movie* and now is the site of what
    was probably the first "big", result-reversing VAR call in the history of Argentinian football.
    Amazing!

    And yeah, you really can't argue about the calls.
    Also, I'd like to know what happened between minutes 45:48 and 48:20!
    Although I can guess... :)
    Ciao,
    Werner
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From HASM@24:150/2 to rec.sport.soccer on Sat Apr 16 05:22:09 2022

    Referee is called by VAR, goes to check it. D|!az had his feet and body inside the box, but arms are extended and his hands holding the ball
    can be clearly seen beyond the line.
    Can't wait to see VAR on some crazy USA lined field.
    I once refereed a woman's college game, on a turf field, where they had
    all kinds of lines of different colors, for football, American football,
    rugby, and maybe some others for smaller field games going in the
    orthogonal direction.
    American football fields are quite narrower compared to football. There
    were at least two incidents where throw-ins were taken from the American football side line, well inside the football field, and had to be
    repeated. On one of them both teams did it in succession, as they
    really didn't understand what was going on, with the original team
    awarded the throw-in finally getting it right.
    There was also a line, probably the "twenty yard line" from American
    football, two yards out from the penalty box, and yes, both keepers kept punting the ball from that line instead of the top of the box.
    This was a slow game, not between top teams, and I decided to let it go.
    Most of the punts in these kinds of games don't really lead anywhere. I
    had to tell one of the assistant referees to stop flagging them, and he
    didn't take it lightly, may have complained to the head referee after
    the game for all I know.
    Thus I bent the rules to go with the "spirit of the game". Wouldn't be
    able to have done it with better teams, TV, VAR, etc.
    -- HASM
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Mark@24:150/2 to rec.sport.soccer on Sun Apr 17 12:28:40 2022
    On Friday, April 15, 2022 at 8:42:34 AM UTC+1, Ll|-o wrote:
    Brasil uses VAR since 2018, and other local leagues already have it working, such as Uruguay, Paraguay, Ecuador, Chile and Colombia. But eventually, on March 31st, 2022, the eighth round of the league, VAR finally made its debut in Argentinian professional football.
    It wouldn't have been the League. The Argentinian League Championship doesn't start till June. It was probably the Copa de la liga profesional.

    And 11 days into the VAR era, this happens:

    https://twitter.com/juans_perez/status/1513896713836191752?t=MJGarymjoDbLMPIkrHdDiQ&s=19

    If you don't want to click on the link above, here's what happens: Hurac|in is
    facing Barracas Central at their stadium, "El Palacio" Tom|is Adolfo Duc||. 87
    minutes into the game, score is 1-1, Barracas lobs the ball into Hurac|in's penalty area and goalkeeper Marcos D|!az comes off to catch the cross. He then
    runs to the edge of the box and quickly releases it to a teammate. The commentator
    wonders, in passing, whether D|!az stepped outside the penalty area, but has no
    time for such musings, as Hurac|in mounts a quick counter-attack and, 10 seconds
    later, scores what seems to be the match's winning goal.

    Was it, though? Referee is called by VAR, goes to check it. D|!az had his feet
    and body inside the box, but arms are extended and his hands holding the ball
    can be clearly seen beyond the line. He was surrounded by three Barracas players
    at that moment, but things happened so fast that none of them seems to have noticed - indeed, none of them complained at the time. The decision is then made:
    no goal, a free kick to Barracas and a yellow card to the unfortunate D|!az.
    A yellow card sounds harsh. It doesn't sound likely to have been deliberate. --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)