FT: 2-2Indeed. LFC lucky to escape with a point. It could have been out of sight in the first half where Liverpool had its worst defensive half all season.
Very exciting game. City overall had the better chances, they must be mad at themselves for letting the chance of settling matters in the league go to waste,
We'll be treated to at least one more round of this in the FA Cup semi, maybe two?Commitment to philosophy, regardless of opposition. The Mourinhos and Simeones of this world will call it foolish, but it takes balls of steel to play such high lines against such quick and terrifying attackers. That's why Guardiola and Klopp get my ultimate respect. Great ambassadors for the game.
On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 5:49:32 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
FT: 2-2
Very exciting game. City overall had the better chances, they must be mad at themselves for letting the chance of settling matters in the league go to waste,
Indeed. LFC lucky to escape with a point.
Interestingly though, the xG was almost even.--- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
We'll be treated to at least one more round of this in the FA Cup semi, maybe two?
Commitment to philosophy, regardless of opposition. The Mourinhos and Simeones of this world will call it foolish, but it takes balls of steel to play such high lines against such quick and terrifying attackers. That's why Guardiola and Klopp get my ultimate respect. Great ambassadors for the game.
On 2022-04-11 09:26, Al Kamista wrote:
On Sunday, April 10, 2022 at 5:49:32 PM UTC-4, Futbolmetrix wrote:
FT: 2-2
Very exciting game. City overall had the better chances, they must be mad at themselves for letting the chance of settling matters in the league go to waste,
Indeed. LFC lucky to escape with a point.I would have to agree. Nice goals, though, both of them.
Still not sold on Thiago, who may have been the weakest link on the day. Plus a little lucky not to get a second yellow. Fabinho also less than
his usual competent self.
I would have to agree. Nice goals, though, both of them.
Still not sold on Thiago, who may have been the weakest link on the day.
Plus a little lucky not to get a second yellow. Fabinho also less than
his usual competent self.
On 2022-04-11, MH <MHno...@ucalgary.ca> wrote:No, Bayern had a better player in Kimmich, that is why he was left out and free to go, Bayern did not want him. He has good ball skills but bad decision making with the ball, never understood why he was so highly regarded and he is a bit of dirty, cheap shot artist as well.
I would have to agree. Nice goals, though, both of them.No-one likes Thiago... if that's the case, can we have him back please?
Still not sold on Thiago, who may have been the weakest link on the day. Plus a little lucky not to get a second yellow. Fabinho also less than
his usual competent self.
No matter what anyone says, we would never have finished 2020 the way we
did without him.
--
ciao, Bruce
ps he really wanted to go to Liverpool... we'd have kept him otherwise
On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 11:11:27 a.m. UTC-4, Bruce Scott wrote:
On 2022-04-11, MH <MHno...@ucalgary.ca> wrote:
I would have to agree. Nice goals, though, both of them.No-one likes Thiago... if that's the case, can we have him back please?
Still not sold on Thiago, who may have been the weakest link on the day. Plus a little lucky not to get a second yellow. Fabinho also less than his usual competent self.
No matter what anyone says, we would never have finished 2020 the way we did without him.
--
ciao, Bruce
ps he really wanted to go to Liverpool... we'd have kept him otherwiseNo, Bayern had a better player in Kimmich, that is why he was left out and free to go, Bayern did not want him.
It's the same reason Alaba left a year later, and Lewandowski might
leave this summer, i.e. players get bored of Bundesliga's one team
dominance and want a new challenge.
| Sysop: | Nitro |
|---|---|
| Location: | Portland, OR |
| Users: | 5 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 230:01:09 |
| Calls: | 132 |
| Files: | 708 |
| Messages: | 85,311 |