• People have this weird idea in their heads that I'm "anti-Hamilton".

    From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 13:21:23 2022

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is so
    much as mentioned:

    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>

    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 13:31:44 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 2:21:26 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    People have this weird idea in their heads that I'm "anti-Hamilton".

    almost precisely or completely precisely?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 13:36:43 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 2:21:26 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.

    almost precisely or completely precisely?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 13:46:44 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 2:21:26 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.

    fuck you.
    you piece of shit.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Vasco Costa@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 20:55:48 2022
    On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is
    so much as mentioned:

    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>

    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.

    Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
    period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
    before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it wouldn't
    be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week since my return
    you basically love to antagonise every single post. Including even my
    post about the Red Bull being an understeering hog that is eating the
    front tyres. All you needed to do was listen to one of the many radio
    messages from Max complaining about it. Or read one of the three links I
    showed you, but that you selectively ignored, because you had already
    fulfilled your antagonising desires.

    I see two possible reasons for that:

    1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.

    2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.

    None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of speech
    and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to read and my
    next course of action is probably going to be using a killfile to filter
    out all posts from you. This is the beauty of Usenet.

    I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving you
    the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last week.
    However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here basically
    confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.

    If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your problem
    is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that), allow yourself to
    find some posts you agree with and give positive feedback, even if you
    add something else to the discussion. It's a good exercise.

    --
    Vasco Costa

    AKA gluon. Enthusiastic about computers, motorsports, science,
    technology, travelling and TV series. Yes I'm a bit of a geek.

    Gemini: gemini://gluonspace.com/
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 14:53:51 2022
    On 2022-04-12 1:55 p.m., Vasco Costa wrote:
    On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is
    so much as mentioned:

    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>

    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.

    Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
    period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
    before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it wouldn't
    be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week since my return
    you basically love to antagonise every single post. Including even my
    post about the Red Bull being an understeering hog that is eating the
    front tyres. All you needed to do was listen to one of the many radio messages from Max complaining about it. Or read one of the three links I showed you, but that you selectively ignored, because you had already fulfilled your antagonising desires.

    I see two possible reasons for that:

    1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.

    2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.

    None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of speech
    and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to read and my
    next course of action is probably going to be using a killfile to filter
    out all posts from you. This is the beauty of Usenet.

    I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving you
    the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last week.
    However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here basically
    confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.

    If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your problem
    is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that), allow yourself to
    find some posts you agree with and give positive feedback, even if you
    add something else to the discussion. It's a good exercise.


    What is my "problem" as you see it? Is it that I tell the truth too much?

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Darryl Johnson@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 18:00:44 2022
    On 2022-04-12 4:55 PM, Vasco Costa wrote:
    On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is
    so much as mentioned:

    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>

    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.

    Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
    period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
    before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it wouldn't
    be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week since my return
    you basically love to antagonise every single post. Including even my
    post about the Red Bull being an understeering hog that is eating the
    front tyres. All you needed to do was listen to one of the many radio messages from Max complaining about it. Or read one of the three links I showed you, but that you selectively ignored, because you had already fulfilled your antagonising desires.

    I see two possible reasons for that:

    1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.

    2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.

    None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of speech
    and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to read and my
    next course of action is probably going to be using a killfile to filter
    out all posts from you. This is the beauty of Usenet.

    Sadly, although Alan is in my killfile, I still end up with all the
    texts responding to him.

    I do wish everyone would just let his posts alone and not respond. I
    know, I know. Not going to happen.

    I can mark the thread when they devolve into petty argument, but I am reluctant to killfile those who do respond to Alan, as they sometimes
    have interesting things to say.

    I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving you
    the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last week.
    However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here basically
    confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.

    If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your problem
    is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that), allow yourself to
    find some posts you agree with and give positive feedback, even if you
    add something else to the discussion. It's a good exercise.

    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Apr 13 10:22:22 2022
    On 13/04/2022 8:21 am, Alan wrote:

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is so much as mentioned:

    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>


    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.


    Not going out of my way to prove what to already absolutely clear to
    everybody here.

    How about the suggestions, at every opportunity, such as the 'car
    designed for him', "team orders', inferior team-mate or opposition, etc,
    etc, etc.

    And never acknowledging poor results sometimes due to the likes of bad
    luck wrt car reliability, safety car timing, actions of other drivers,
    etc, etc, etc again. And now 'team orders' the other way around - ha ha !

    Always predictable, repeated, and seemingly inevitable. And never the
    same focus being on other drivers.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 15:32:50 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 3:53:53 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    What is my "problem" as you see it?

    You are a trolling piece of shit.
    And a disgrace of a F1 fan.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Apr 13 11:39:54 2022
    On 13/04/2022 10:00 am, Darryl Johnson wrote:
    Sadly, although Alan is in my killfile, I still end up with all the texts responding to him.

    I do wish everyone would just let his posts alone and not respond. I know, I know. Not going to
    happen.

    I can mark the thread when they devolve into petty argument, but I am reluctant to killfile those
    who do respond to Alan, as they sometimes have interesting things to say.

    Yep, ditto to all of that.

    Baker's been in my killfile for years. He sometimes changes his 'from' address to escape but I just
    put him back in the first post I see. For years I read his posts and even tried to rationalise with
    him a few times but to no avail.

    I'd hate to be that needy and lonely myself but that doesn't mean I'm going to be one of his
    charity workers. I have a friend who has a very autistic, non-verbal son and interacting with that
    boy is a piece of cake compared with how Baker interacts with others.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 18:19:23 2022
    On 2022-04-12 3:22 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 13/04/2022 8:21 am, Alan wrote:

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is
    so much as mentioned:

    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>


    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.


    Not going out of my way to prove what to already absolutely clear to everybody here.

    Of course not.


    How about the suggestions, at every opportunity, such as the 'car
    designed for him', "team orders', inferior team-mate or opposition, etc, etc, etc.

    What about those things? Is any of them untrue?


    And never acknowledging poor results sometimes due to the likes of bad
    luck wrt car reliability, safety car timing, actions of other drivers,
    etc, etc, etc again. And now 'team orders' the other way around - ha ha !

    You think that Hamilton ISN'T still the number 1 driver at Mercedes?


    Always predictable, repeated, and-a seemingly inevitable. And never the
    same focus being on other drivers.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 18:20:35 2022
    On 2022-04-12 4:39 p.m., ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 13/04/2022 10:00 am, Darryl Johnson wrote:
    Sadly, although Alan is in my killfile, I still end up with all the
    texts responding to him.

    I do wish everyone would just let his posts alone and not respond. I
    know, I know. Not going to happen.

    I can mark the thread when they devolve into petty argument, but I am
    reluctant to killfile those who do respond to Alan, as they sometimes
    have interesting things to say.

    Yep, ditto to all of that.

    Baker's been in my killfile for years. He sometimes changes his 'from' address to escape but I just put him back in the first post I see. For
    years I read his posts and even tried to rationalise with him a few
    times but to no avail.

    Nope.

    I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
    my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.


    I'd hate to be that needy and lonely myself but that doesn't mean I'm
    going to be one of his charity workers. I have a friend who has a very autistic, non-verbal son and interacting with that boy is a piece of
    cake compared with how Baker interacts with others
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 20:50:59 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
    my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.

    too much info
    you are losing your fucking mind
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 20:52:51 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
    my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.

    lol. you cant fix stupid
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 20:54:42 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    I was having trouble

    24/7. fuck off you dumb cunt
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 21:03:18 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
    my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.

    stupid in
    stupid out
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 21:12:48 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:20:38 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    I have only changed my email address because I was having trouble with
    my Usenet server and was trying to get it working again properly.

    yup its the server
    not the brain dead moron behind the keyboard
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Apr 12 21:57:10 2022
    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 2:21:26 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    People have this weird idea

    speaking of weird
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Apr 13 10:18:49 2022
    On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 15:32:50 -0700 (PDT), texas gate wrote:

    On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 3:53:53 PM UTC-6, Alan wrote:

    What is my "problem" as you see it?

    You are a trolling piece of shit.
    And a disgrace of a F1 fan.

    +1
    When Texasgate makes more sense than you do you should probably take the
    hint & all it a day



    --
    The easiest way to figure the cost of living is to take your income and
    add ten percent.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Apr 13 11:51:58 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-04-12 1:55 p.m., Vasco Costa wrote:
    On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where
    Hamilton is so much as mentioned:


    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>

    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever
    said.

    Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
    period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
    before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it
    wouldn't be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week
    since my return you basically love to antagonise every single post. Including even my post about the Red Bull being an understeering
    hog that is eating the front tyres. All you needed to do was listen
    to one of the many radio messages from Max complaining about it. Or
    read one of the three links I showed you, but that you selectively
    ignored, because you had already fulfilled your antagonising
    desires.

    I see two possible reasons for that:

    1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.

    2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.

    None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of
    speech and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to
    read and my next course of action is probably going to be using a
    killfile to filter out all posts from you. This is the beauty of
    Usenet.

    I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving
    you the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last
    week. However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here
    basically confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.

    If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your
    problem is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that),
    allow yourself to find some posts you agree with and give positive feedback, even if you add something else to the discussion. It's a
    good exercise.


    What is my "problem" as you see it? Is it that I tell the truth too
    much?

    :-)

    So much so that you end up getting caught in a tangle of lies in nearly
    every thread you hopelessly extend.

    I'm not even sure if you are simply delusional; a pathological liar.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Apr 13 07:34:54 2022
    On 2022-04-13 4:51 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-04-12 1:55 p.m., Vasco Costa wrote:
    On 12/04/2022, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where
    Hamilton is so much as mentioned:


    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>

    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever
    said.

    Over the last decades I visited this group on and off. After a long
    period I'm back and enjoying it quite a lot, perhaps even more than
    before. Except your posts. If you were just anti-Hamilton, it
    wouldn't be a problem, but from what I'm seeing in just a week
    since my return you basically love to antagonise every single post.
    Including even my post about the Red Bull being an understeering
    hog that is eating the front tyres. All you needed to do was listen
    to one of the many radio messages from Max complaining about it. Or
    read one of the three links I showed you, but that you selectively
    ignored, because you had already fulfilled your antagonising
    desires.

    I see two possible reasons for that:

    1. You're a troll wannabe, even if very poor at that.

    2. You're not a troll but only enjoy antagonising others.

    None of which interest me anymore, even if I'm all for freedom of
    speech and against central moderation. Basically you're annoying to
    read and my next course of action is probably going to be using a
    killfile to filter out all posts from you. This is the beauty of
    Usenet.

    I had waited before making a post like this, because I was giving
    you the benefit of doubt, since I've returned to RASF1 only last
    week. However, seeing so many posts from the regulars here
    basically confirming my thoughts made it clear to me.

    If you're open to accept some constructive criticism and if your
    problem is just about antagonism (I've been there, done that),
    allow yourself to find some posts you agree with and give positive
    feedback, even if you add something else to the discussion. It's a
    good exercise.


    What is my "problem" as you see it? Is it that I tell the truth too
    much?

    :-)

    So much so that you end up getting caught in a tangle of lies in nearly
    every thread you hopelessly extend.

    I'm not even sure if you are simply delusional; a pathological liar.


    LOL!

    Your misinterpretations of what I have said don't make me a liar.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Slang@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Apr 13 22:08:38 2022
    Il 12/04/2022 22:21, Alan ha scritto:

    Well here is a search for every post I've ever made where Hamilton is so much as mentioned:

    <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.autos.sport.f1/search?q=hamilton%20author%3Aalan>


    Have at it folks: find the most "anti-Hamilton" thing I've ever said.


    IMHO: LH is far from being the GOAT or the best driver of his generation.
    Is a very very good driver that, from 2014, was the driver of the,
    maybe, GOAT F1 car.
    ;-)
    S
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)