• would anybody sane go to Melbourne F1 now?

    From Tedros Fauci@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 07:42:34 2022
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 15:38:55 2022
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of "asylum seekers" who are more
    accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" would already be double vaccinated and, by
    the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 16:51:41 2022
    On 9/01/2022 3:38 pm, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of "asylum seekers" who are more
    accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" would already be double vaccinated and, by
    the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    Also with over 78% of the population of Australia fully vaccinated* there will be many many local
    people (who've spent a long time locked down) wanting to go to the GP. They don't need plague
    spreading nutjobs coming from overseas to make the GP successful.

    * <https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/international>
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 10:38:06 2022
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 07:42:34 +0800, Tedros Fauci wrote:

    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    or simply follow their rules, don't lie*, & get in simple

    * dopey nutjob or whatever his name is claims to have tested +ve on 16 but
    was seen making presentations to children on 17th, so either he is lieing about the test or worse a total scumbag who does not give a shit about infecting others, take your pick.




    --
    Academy:
    A modern school where football is taught.
    Institute:
    An archaic school where football is not taught.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From keithr0@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 22:14:53 2022
    On 9/01/2022 1:51 pm, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 3:38 pm, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    Also with over 78% of the population of Australia fully vaccinated*
    there will be many many local people (who've spent a long time locked
    down) wanting to go to the GP. They don't need plague spreading nutjobs coming from overseas to make the GP successful.

    * <https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/international>

    Make that 93.9% nationally
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 15:00:06 2022
    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.


    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 18:55:34 2022
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "
    as opposed to BRAIN DEAD


    would already be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely
    boosted as well.





    --
    "Nuclear war would really set back cable."
    -- Ted Turner
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 11:29:00 2022
    On 10/01/2022 1:14 am, keithr0 wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 1:51 pm, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 3:38 pm, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of "asylum seekers" who are more
    accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" would already be double vaccinated and,
    by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    Also with over 78% of the population of Australia fully vaccinated* there will be many many local
    people (who've spent a long time locked down) wanting to go to the GP. They don't need plague
    spreading nutjobs coming from overseas to make the GP successful.

    * <https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/international>

    Make that 93.9% nationally

    That would be percentage of ELIGIBLE people. Most international sites just list percentage of total
    population (which skews results for populations which might have more or less young or older members).
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From fnot@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 17:31:50 2022
    On 2022-01-09 1:55 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "
    as opposed to BRAIN DEAD
    Same thing without the quotes.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From XYXPDQ@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 17:50:15 2022
    If your fully injected and get sick the you get treated as a criminal.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 18:13:44 2022
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 6:50:16 PM UTC-7, XYXPDQ wrote:

    If your fully injected and get sick the you get treated as a criminal.

    log off and lay off the booze
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 09:56:10 2022
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 12:08:05 2022
    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary
    world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?


    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 13:38:47 2022
    XYXPDQ wrote:

    If your fully injected and get sick the you get treated as a
    criminal.

    I'm sure that made sense as you typed and just lost it all at the
    keyboard interface.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Build
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 13:40:56 2022
    Tedros Fauci wrote:

    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    LOL,

    nuff said.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Build
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Sir Tim@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 14:03:29 2022
    Bigbird <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    XYXPDQ wrote:

    If your fully injected and get sick the you get treated as a
    criminal.

    I'm sure that made sense as you typed and just lost it all at the
    keyboard interface.


    LOL

    --
    Sir Tim
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 16:08:07 2022
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs. >>>>> You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir? >FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary
    world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 17:12:34 2022
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs. >>>>>> You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir? >> FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary
    world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.



    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 08:51:46 2022
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs. >>>>>>> You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir? >>> FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary
    world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance
    to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't
    seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 12:18:57 2022
    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs. >>>>>>>> You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well. >>>>>
    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have >>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary
    world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making
    up your own brainless additions.

    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance
    to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be
    more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.


    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't
    seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?



    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 12:28:06 2022
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs. >>>>>>>>> You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well. >>>>>>
    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have >>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary >>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making
    up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED "
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.




    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by
    "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance
    to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be
    more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't
    seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So
    be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 13:59:38 2022
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com>
    wrote: >>
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a
    bunch of >>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to
    cockroaches and bed bugs. >>>>>>>>> You can't bring your private
    chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted
    as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who
    would have >>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might
    that be sir? >>>>> FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I
    qualify in your imaginary >>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that
    might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without
    making up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED "
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.




    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some
    plot by >> "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason.
    Your reluctance >> to offer an alternative explanation tends to
    confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll
    be more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others
    don't >> seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So
    be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    Edmund appears to be claiming to be brainwashed... and who are we to
    disagree.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Build
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Sir Tim@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 17:51:05 2022
    Bigbird <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com>
    wrote: >>
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com>
    wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a
    bunch of >>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to
    cockroaches and bed bugs. >>>>>>>>> You can't bring your private
    chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted
    as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who
    would have >>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might
    that be sir? >>>>> FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I
    qualify in your imaginary >>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that
    might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without
    making up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED "
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.




    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some
    plot by >> "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason.
    Your reluctance >> to offer an alternative explanation tends to
    confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll
    be more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others
    don't >> seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So
    be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    Edmund appears to be claiming to be brainwashed... and who are we to disagree.


    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 11:13:51 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 10:51:08 AM UTC-7, Sir Tim wrote:

    :-)

    Thanks for fuck all Sir Dick.
    Useless as ever.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 22:38:34 2022
    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well. >>>>>>>
    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have >>>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary >>>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making
    up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    Why don't you think about it yourself, you don't learn much if
    everything has to be explained to you




    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by
    "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance
    to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be
    more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available

    That are certainly other words with another meaning.




    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't
    seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So
    be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    Answer the question, is a multiple vaccinated person a ant-vaxxer?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 13:51:17 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 2:38:38 PM UTC-7, Edmund wrote:

    Answer the question, is a multiple vaccinated person a ant-vaxxer?

    hi stupid
    take this crap elsewhere
    you numb idiot
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan LeHun@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 22:17:46 2022
    In article <srktcr$ae1$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    Answer the question, is a multiple vaccinated person a ant-vaxxer?


    They certainly can be. Someone can feel compelled to do something that
    they are vehemently opposed to.

    I had someone at work who got vaccinated because they wanted the
    passport to go on holiday last year. He wouldn't shut up about being
    'forced' to take the vaccine and still complains about it even now.

    For context, he also thought Trump had the US presidency stolen from him
    and wouldn't shut up about that either.


    --
    Alan LeHun
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 17:29:24 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 3:17:48 PM UTC-7, Alan LeHun wrote:

    fuck off
    your same crap has been spewed for years
    got anything related to f1?
    fucking moron
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 17:31:28 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 3:17:48 PM UTC-7, Alan LeHun wrote:

    Trump

    lol
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 17:38:55 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 3:17:48 PM UTC-7, Alan LeHun wrote:

    I had someone at work who got vaccinated

    thats what you talk about?
    you sick asshole
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 19:28:38 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 3:17:48 PM UTC-7, Alan LeHun wrote:

    Trump

    is trump connected to f1?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 19:32:32 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 3:17:48 PM UTC-7, Alan LeHun wrote:

    For context, he also thought Trump had the US presidency stolen from him
    and wouldn't shut up about that either.

    oh poor fucking you
    this aint facebook asshole
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 19:42:36 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 5:28:10 AM UTC-7, martin...@gmail.com wrote:

    are you Covid vaccinated?

    hey harry martin
    fuck off
    and get a life
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 19:44:03 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 2:38:38 PM UTC-7, Edmund wrote:

    Answer the question, is a multiple vaccinated person a ant-vaxxer?

    fuck you
    you fucking useless cunt
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 19:46:31 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 2:38:38 PM UTC-7, Edmund wrote:

    Answer the question

    fuck off
    you fucking idiot
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 19:58:44 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 2:38:38 PM UTC-7, Edmund wrote:

    Answer the question

    you survived aids
    be happy
    and fuck off
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 19:59:58 2022
    On Tuesday, January 11, 2022 at 3:17:48 PM UTC-7, Alan LeHun wrote:

    Trump

    you survived aids
    be happy
    and fuck off
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 11:03:13 2022
    On 1/11/22 11:17 PM, Alan LeHun wrote:
    In article <srktcr$ae1$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    Answer the question, is a multiple vaccinated person a ant-vaxxer?


    They certainly can be. Someone can feel compelled to do something that
    they are vehemently opposed to.

    I had someone at work who got vaccinated because they wanted the
    passport to go on holiday last year. He wouldn't shut up about being
    'forced' to take the vaccine and still complains about it even now.

    Well if he never in his life was vaccinated before and now they force
    him, he have a point here don't you think.

    For context, he also thought Trump had the US presidency stolen from him
    and wouldn't shut up about that either.

    Oh dear that really must be a terrible person so he is not blindly
    obeying the MSM like you?
    Can't you fire him? Is still allowed to think for oneself, if so I hope
    that will be revoked ASAP and mobilize the thought police.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Pastor Peeved@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 18:20:00 2022
    alister wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 07:42:34 +0800, Tedros Fauci wrote:

    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of "asylum
    seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    or simply follow their rules, don't lie*, & get in simple

    * dopey nutjob or whatever his name is claims to have tested +ve on 16 but was seen making presentations to children on 17th, so either he is lieing about the test or worse a total scumbag who does not give a shit about infecting others, take your pick.




    Now the Serbian president has said that Novax shoulda been isolating...
    that is intersting, it is an election year and one would expect she
    would be blindly supporting Novax, even though he lives in Monaco to
    avoid paying millions in taxes to his home nation.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan LeHun@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 15:53:02 2022
    In article <srm912$ddq$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    On 1/11/22 11:17 PM, Alan LeHun wrote:
    In article <srktcr$ae1$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    Answer the question, is a multiple vaccinated person a ant-vaxxer?


    They certainly can be. Someone can feel compelled to do something that
    they are vehemently opposed to.

    I had someone at work who got vaccinated because they wanted the
    passport to go on holiday last year. He wouldn't shut up about being 'forced' to take the vaccine and still complains about it even now.

    Well if he never in his life was vaccinated before and now they force
    him, he have a point here don't you think.

    He wasn't forced. He choose to believe that he had been forced as
    accepting that he had voluntarily had the vaccine (which is, indeed, the
    case) would be an admission of personal failure.

    People /can/ choose not to have the vaccine. They can not choose to
    force other people to interact or otherwise engage with them. If others
    decide that people must be vaccinated before entering their country they
    are perfectly entitled to do so. That is not 'forcing' people to have
    the vaccine.


    For context, he also thought Trump had the US presidency stolen from him and wouldn't shut up about that either.

    Oh dear that really must be a terrible person so he is not blindly
    obeying the MSM like you?
    Can't you fire him? Is still allowed to think for oneself, if so I hope that will be revoked ASAP and mobilize the thought police.

    The idea that Trump had the presidency stolen from him is absurd. I find
    it telling when people say otherwise.




    --
    Alan LeHun
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 16:29:44 2022
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:38:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well. >>>>>>>>
    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have >>>>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary >>>>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making >>> up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    Why don't you think about it yourself, you don't learn much if
    everything has to be explained to you

    Continued evasion noted.





    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by >>>> "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance >>>> to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be
    more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    BTW, *you* started the insults by labelling me as BRAINWASHED as I
    have received both doses of the vaccine plus the booster.


    IOW, no alternative explanation available

    That are certainly other words with another meaning.

    I honestly haven't a clue what that is supposed to mean.





    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't
    seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So
    be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    Answer the question, is a multiple vaccinated person a ant-vaxxer?

    My original post was in the context of *Covid vaccination*. From
    everything you have said (and not said) so far, I continue to believe
    that in that context of Covid vaccination, you do belong to that group
    of anti-vaxxers who are fueled by some sort of conspiracy that the
    Covid vaccine is really some nefarious plot by "them". I'm open to
    being convinced otherwise but evasion won't convince me.

    BTW, in regard to your "multiple vaccinations", how many of those were voluntary on your part i.e. not decided by your parents when you were
    a child or necessary for a visa to enter some country?


    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 17:41:49 2022
    On 1/12/22 4:53 PM, Alan LeHun wrote:
    In article <srm912$ddq$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    On 1/11/22 11:17 PM, Alan LeHun wrote:
    In article <srktcr$ae1$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    Answer the question, is a multiple vaccinated person a ant-vaxxer?


    They certainly can be. Someone can feel compelled to do something that
    they are vehemently opposed to.

    I had someone at work who got vaccinated because they wanted the
    passport to go on holiday last year. He wouldn't shut up about being
    'forced' to take the vaccine and still complains about it even now.

    Well if he never in his life was vaccinated before and now they force
    him, he have a point here don't you think.

    He wasn't forced. He choose to believe that he had been forced as
    accepting that he had voluntarily had the vaccine (which is, indeed, the case) would be an admission of personal failure.

    People /can/ choose not to have the vaccine. They can not choose to
    force other people to interact or otherwise engage with them. If others decide that people must be vaccinated before entering their country they
    are perfectly entitled to do so. That is not 'forcing' people to have
    the vaccine.

    Well that other country makes it even more complicated, a country can
    demand such a foolish things I guess.
    Demanding people to let them inject an experimental drug with an
    emergency allowance that is not even out of the required testing period
    and long term effects are unknown.
    Good they recently redefined the word "vaccine"
    in order to make it possible to call these medical experiments "vaccines".





    For context, he also thought Trump had the US presidency stolen from him >>> and wouldn't shut up about that either.

    Oh dear that really must be a terrible person so he is not blindly
    obeying the MSM like you?
    Can't you fire him? Is still allowed to think for oneself, if so I hope
    that will be revoked ASAP and mobilize the thought police.

    The idea that Trump had the presidency stolen from him is absurd. I find
    it telling when people say otherwise.


    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this prime peace
    of human intellect
    as your President, the most popular one ever!
    I am sure US citizens are drunk of happiness ever since.




    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Mark Jackson@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 12:49:45 2022
    On 1/12/2022 11:41 AM, Edmund wrote:
    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this prime
    peace of human intellect as your President, the most popular one
    ever!


    Biden's current approval rating of 43.1% (538's weighted average) is
    higher than Trump's at this stage (and indeed over almost all of) his presidency.

    Guess which one has claimed to be "the most popular one ever!"

    --
    Mark Jackson - https://mark-jackson.online/
    As for behavior, I have shocking news:
    Physicists can be arrogant. - Mike Tamor
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 18:57:09 2022
    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well. >>>>>>>
    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have >>>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary >>>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making
    up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    My reaction was to the one who claimed that everyone who is not boosted
    is not sane.
    So no matter if you are a healthy teenager with ZERO change of serious
    health issues with Covid.
    No matter if you already had covid and recovered and therefore have a
    superior immunity compared to the "vaccines" that where made for the extinguished versions of the Virus.

    Now we have Omicron, which is like a cold after you have been vaccinated
    or had a previous infection.
    No need for boosters at all although you have more change of getting it
    at after 2 jabs, compared to no jabs of a booster :-).

    I didn't said EVERYBODY who got jabbed and got a booster is brainwashed.
    There are good reasons for some people to do so, there are equally good reasons for a lot of people not to take boosters or no experimental jabs
    at all.>



    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by
    "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance
    to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be
    more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't
    seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So
    be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    My question still stands, can a multiple vaccinated person be a anti-vaxxer? That is a pretty ludicrous statement IMO



    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Sir Tim@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 19:28:35 2022
    Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    The idea that Trump had the presidency stolen from him is absurd. I find
    it telling when people say otherwise.


    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this prime peace
    of human intellect
    as your President, the most popular one ever!
    I am sure US citizens are drunk of happiness ever since.

    Your pathetic attempt at sarcasm is no response to the statement: rCLThe idea that Trump had the presidency stolen from him is absurd.rCY



    --
    Sir Tim
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 13 09:56:35 2022
    On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:57:09 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well. >>>>>>>>
    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have >>>>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary >>>>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making >>> up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    My reaction was to the one who claimed that everyone who is not boosted
    is not sane.

    Then deal with that person without labelling me and people like me as BRAINWASHED.

    So no matter if you are a healthy teenager with ZERO change of serious >health issues with Covid.
    No matter if you already had covid and recovered and therefore have a >superior immunity compared to the "vaccines" that where made for the >extinguished versions of the Virus.

    Now we have Omicron, which is like a cold after you have been vaccinated
    or had a previous infection.

    There are almost 20K people in hospital with Covid right now in the UK
    alone. How many do you reckon are in hospital with the cold?

    No need for boosters at all although you have more change of getting it
    at after 2 jabs, compared to no jabs of a booster :-).

    All the top medical experts state that the booster significantly
    increases protection and significantl* reduces the chances of
    hospitalisation. Just like in F1, you reckon you know better than the
    qualified experts.


    I didn't said EVERYBODY who got jabbed and got a booster is brainwashed.

    You've just said that the person you responded to claimed that
    everyone who is not boosted is not sane. You simply changed the word
    "sane" to BRAINWASHED which meant you too were referring to everyone.


    There are good reasons for some people to do so, there are equally good >reasons for a lot of people not to take boosters or no experimental jabs
    at all.>



    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by >>>> "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance >>>> to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be
    more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't
    seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So
    be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    My question still stands, can a multiple vaccinated person be a anti-vaxxer? >That is a pretty ludicrous statement IMO

    Answered in my earlier response to your preceeding post.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 13 11:18:04 2022
    On 1/13/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:57:09 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well. >>>>>>>>>
    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have >>>>>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary >>>>>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making >>>> up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already
    be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    My reaction was to the one who claimed that everyone who is not boosted
    is not sane.

    Then deal with that person without labelling me and people like me as BRAINWASHED.

    I didn't, you did that yourself.
    What I said ( in one sentence ) that brainwashed people are vaccinated
    and boosted, what I didn't say is that all vaccinated people where brainwashed.
    To be fair to you and seeing how you attack me, yup YOU are brainwashed.


    So no matter if you are a healthy teenager with ZERO change of serious
    health issues with Covid.
    No matter if you already had covid and recovered and therefore have a
    superior immunity compared to the "vaccines" that where made for the
    extinguished versions of the Virus.

    Now we have Omicron, which is like a cold after you have been vaccinated
    or had a previous infection.

    There are almost 20K people in hospital with Covid right now in the UK
    alone. How many do you reckon are in hospital with the cold?

    I don't know, in SA the hospitals are empty with a 20% vaccination rate.

    No need for boosters at all although you have more change of getting it
    at after 2 jabs, compared to no jabs of a booster :-).

    All the top medical experts state

    Starting with such a statement, is childish and make any discussion impossible, are you aware of that?

    that the booster significantly
    increases protection and significantl* reduces the chances of hospitalisation.

    Pfizer you mean?
    Can you show data of that? We are talking about Omicron now you know.

    Just like in F1, you reckon you know better than the
    qualified experts.

    Another off topic childish baseless labeling, are you aware of what you
    are doing?


    I didn't said EVERYBODY who got jabbed and got a booster is brainwashed.

    You've just said that the person you responded to claimed that
    everyone who is not boosted is not sane. You simply changed the word
    "sane" to BRAINWASHED which meant you too were referring to everyone.

    Nope, brainwashed people go blindly for boosters every month.
    Not every vaccinated human is brainwashed but you most certainly are.


    There are good reasons for some people to do so, there are equally good
    reasons for a lot of people not to take boosters or no experimental jabs
    at all.>



    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by >>>>> "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance >>>>> to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be
    more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't >>>>> seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So
    be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    My question still stands, can a multiple vaccinated person be a anti-vaxxer? >> That is a pretty ludicrous statement IMO

    Answered in my earlier response to your preceeding post.

    Remind me or are you realizing now how foolish your suggestion is.

    Edmund




    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 13 11:21:48 2022
    On 1/12/22 6:49 PM, Mark Jackson wrote:
    On 1/12/2022 11:41 AM, Edmund wrote:
    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this prime
    peace of human intellect as your President, the most popular one
    ever!


    Biden's current approval rating of 43.1% (538's weighted average) is
    higher than Trump's at this stage (and indeed over almost all of) his presidency.

    Guess which one has claimed to be "the most popular one ever!"

    I don't have to guess, the brilliant Biden got more votes then any
    president ever.
    ( so they say )


    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 13 11:24:27 2022
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:18:04 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/13/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:57:09 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane"

    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have >>>>>>>>>> thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary >>>>>>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making >>>>> up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already >>>> be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    My reaction was to the one who claimed that everyone who is not boosted
    is not sane.

    Then deal with that person without labelling me and people like me as
    BRAINWASHED.

    I didn't, you did that yourself.
    What I said ( in one sentence ) that brainwashed people are vaccinated
    and boosted, what I didn't say is that all vaccinated people where >brainwashed.

    Nope, as already explained to you, the OP, according to you, was
    including *everyone* in his claim. You simply changed the word "sane"
    to "BRAINWASHED" so your comment equally applied to *everyone*.

    To be fair to you and seeing how you attack me, yup YOU are brainwashed.


    So no matter if you are a healthy teenager with ZERO change of serious
    health issues with Covid.
    No matter if you already had covid and recovered and therefore have a
    superior immunity compared to the "vaccines" that where made for the
    extinguished versions of the Virus.

    Now we have Omicron, which is like a cold after you have been vaccinated >>> or had a previous infection.

    There are almost 20K people in hospital with Covid right now in the UK
    alone. How many do you reckon are in hospital with the cold?

    I don't know, in SA the hospitals are empty with a 20% vaccination rate.

    I'll rephrase my question. There are currently 8.5K people in hospital
    in South Africa with Covid [1]. Do you know anyone in hospital with
    the cold?

    [1] https://www.nicd.ac.za/diseases-a-z-index/disease-index-covid-19/surveillance-reports/daily-hospital-surveillance-datcov-report/


    No need for boosters at all although you have more change of getting it
    at after 2 jabs, compared to no jabs of a booster :-).

    All the top medical experts state

    Starting with such a statement, is childish and make any discussion >impossible, are you aware of that?

    How so? If you have a medical problem do you go to a doctor or do you
    go looking for some self-declared expert on social media?


    that the booster significantly
    increases protection and significantl* reduces the chances of
    hospitalisation.

    Pfizer you mean?
    Can you show data of that? We are talking about Omicron now you know.

    How about the scientists in your own country:

    "The scientists [in South Africa] concluded that "previous infection,
    followed by vaccination - or likely a booster - is probably protective
    against omicron, and almost certainly against severe disease."

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/14/covid-booster-dose-is-crucial-against-omicron-variant-heres-why.html
    The article summarises results from all around the world, all saying
    the same thing.



    Just like in F1, you reckon you know better than the
    qualified experts.

    Another off topic childish baseless labeling, are you aware of what you
    are doing?


    I didn't said EVERYBODY who got jabbed and got a booster is brainwashed.

    You've just said that the person you responded to claimed that
    everyone who is not boosted is not sane. You simply changed the word
    "sane" to BRAINWASHED which meant you too were referring to everyone.

    Nope, brainwashed people go blindly for boosters every month.

    I have an underlying cardiac condition for which I take 8 tablets
    every day. Does that make me brainwashed?

    Not every vaccinated human is brainwashed but you most certainly are.


    There are good reasons for some people to do so, there are equally good
    reasons for a lot of people not to take boosters or no experimental jabs >>> at all.>



    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by >>>>>> "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance >>>>>> to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be >>>>> more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some
    think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't >>>>>> seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So >>>> be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    My question still stands, can a multiple vaccinated person be a anti-vaxxer?
    That is a pretty ludicrous statement IMO

    Answered in my earlier response to your preceeding post.

    Remind me or are you realizing now how foolish your suggestion is.

    Whilst recognising your intellectual limitations, I did think you
    could find a post from yesterday that was a direct response to one
    from you. Anyway, here is what I said:

    "My original post was in the context of *Covid vaccination*. From
    everything you have said (and not said) so far, I continue to believe
    that in that context of Covid vaccination, you do belong to that group
    of anti-vaxxers who are fueled by some sort of conspiracy that the
    Covid vaccine is really some nefarious plot by "them". I'm open to
    being convinced otherwise but evasion won't convince me.

    BTW, in regard to your "multiple vaccinations", how many of those were voluntary on your part i.e. not decided by your parents when you were
    a child or necessary for a visa to enter some country?"

    Your lack of response to my final question suggests that none of your
    multiple vaccines was voluntary on your part.


    Edmund
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 13 13:53:30 2022
    On 1/13/22 12:24 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:18:04 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/13/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:57:09 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" >>>>>>>>>>>>
    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary >>>>>>>>>> world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ?

    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making >>>>>> up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already >>>>> be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    My reaction was to the one who claimed that everyone who is not boosted >>>> is not sane.

    Then deal with that person without labelling me and people like me as
    BRAINWASHED.

    I didn't, you did that yourself.
    What I said ( in one sentence ) that brainwashed people are vaccinated
    and boosted, what I didn't say is that all vaccinated people where
    brainwashed.

    Nope, as already explained to you, the OP, according to you, was
    including *everyone* in his claim. You simply changed the word "sane"
    to "BRAINWASHED" so your comment equally applied to *everyone*.

    Now why don't you write down that sentence, read it out loud and let is
    sink in.
    Maybe, just maybe you will found out that it then says BRAINWASHED
    people are vaccinated.

    Spoiler : that is not the same as vaccinated people are brainwashed.



    To be fair to you and seeing how you attack me, yup YOU are brainwashed.


    So no matter if you are a healthy teenager with ZERO change of serious >>>> health issues with Covid.
    No matter if you already had covid and recovered and therefore have a
    superior immunity compared to the "vaccines" that where made for the
    extinguished versions of the Virus.

    Now we have Omicron, which is like a cold after you have been vaccinated >>>> or had a previous infection.

    There are almost 20K people in hospital with Covid right now in the UK
    alone. How many do you reckon are in hospital with the cold?

    I don't know, in SA the hospitals are empty with a 20% vaccination rate.

    I'll rephrase my question. There are currently 8.5K people in hospital
    in South Africa with Covid [1]. Do you know anyone in hospital with
    the cold?

    Well at the moment I don't have friends in hospitals but I am 100% sure
    there are people in hospitals which have a cold.
    Doctors say that a high percentage of those
    registered Covid patients where accidental, meaning they didn't even
    knew they had it until they where tested in the hospital.
    Still the numbers working out as 0.01% of the population.
    Not many on ventilators and no long hospital stay.

    [1] https://www.nicd.ac.za/diseases-a-z-index/disease-index-covid-19/surveillance-reports/daily-hospital-surveillance-datcov-report/


    No need for boosters at all although you have more change of getting it >>>> at after 2 jabs, compared to no jabs of a booster :-).

    All the top medical experts state

    Starting with such a statement, is childish and make any discussion
    impossible, are you aware of that?

    How so? If you have a medical problem do you go to a doctor or do you
    go looking for some self-declared expert on social media?

    Claiming something foolish as ALL TOP EXPERTS....
    You really don't understand what is wrong with that?
    If I can name one single expert who doesn't agree with your baseless statement, what will you do, claiming it is a conspiracy theorist?
    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?




    that the booster significantly
    increases protection and significantl* reduces the chances of
    hospitalisation.

    Pfizer you mean?
    Can you show data of that? We are talking about Omicron now you know.

    How about the scientists in your own country:

    "The scientists [in South Africa] concluded that "previous infection, followed by vaccination - or likely a booster - is probably protective against omicron, and almost certainly against severe disease."

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/14/covid-booster-dose-is-crucial-against-omicron-variant-heres-why.html
    The article summarises results from all around the world, all saying
    the same thing.

    Well as you can read, that article is remarkably vague and they use
    terms as
    "probably" and "almost" along with a couple obvious things like previous infections in addition to boosters will likely improve protection.
    They avoid naming the fact that SA shows that unvaccinated people
    recover very well from Omicron.






    Just like in F1, you reckon you know better than the
    qualified experts.

    Another off topic childish baseless labeling, are you aware of what you
    are doing?


    I didn't said EVERYBODY who got jabbed and got a booster is brainwashed. >>>
    You've just said that the person you responded to claimed that
    everyone who is not boosted is not sane. You simply changed the word
    "sane" to BRAINWASHED which meant you too were referring to everyone.

    Nope, brainwashed people go blindly for boosters every month.

    I have an underlying cardiac condition for which I take 8 tablets
    every day. Does that make me brainwashed?

    No, that's not the reason, you have a very good reason for doing what
    you do.
    It's that part where you attack me and label me as a "conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer " that is what shows you are brainwashed.

    Not every vaccinated human is brainwashed but you most certainly are.


    There are good reasons for some people to do so, there are equally good >>>> reasons for a lot of people not to take boosters or no experimental jabs >>>> at all.>



    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by >>>>>>> "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance >>>>>>> to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be >>>>>> more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some >>>>>>> think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't >>>>>>> seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a
    multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So >>>>> be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    My question still stands, can a multiple vaccinated person be a anti-vaxxer?
    That is a pretty ludicrous statement IMO

    Answered in my earlier response to your preceeding post.

    Remind me or are you realizing now how foolish your suggestion is.

    Whilst recognising your intellectual limitations, I did think you
    could find a post from yesterday that was a direct response to one
    from you. Anyway, here is what I said:

    "My original post was in the context of *Covid vaccination*. From
    everything you have said (and not said) so far, I continue to believe
    that in that context of Covid vaccination, you do belong to that group
    of anti-vaxxers who are fueled by some sort of conspiracy that the
    Covid vaccine is really some nefarious plot by "them". I'm open to
    being convinced otherwise but evasion won't convince me.

    OK so in your mind its in the context of Covid vaccination, which means
    not against vaccinations as such.
    Which means labeling people as anti-vaxxers is a very stupid expression.
    The addition of "conspiracy" makes it even worse, it not about
    discussing anything it's solely about disqualifying people with another opinion no matter what.
    I find it extremely arrogant to try disqualify people with another
    opinion then the MSM allows.
    My experience is that people with second thoughts about the one fits all
    vaccination solution are way more informed then the ones who blindly
    follow the MSM.

    BTW, in regard to your "multiple vaccinations", how many of those were voluntary on your part i.e. not decided by your parents when you were
    a child or necessary for a visa to enter some country?"

    Your lack of response to my final question suggests that none of your multiple vaccines was voluntary on your part.

    A had a few for vacations they where voluntary.


    Edmund


    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Mark Jackson@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 13 17:34:27 2022
    On 1/13/2022 5:21 AM, Edmund wrote:
    On 1/12/22 6:49 PM, Mark Jackson wrote:
    On 1/12/2022 11:41 AM, Edmund wrote:
    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this
    prime peace of human intellect as your President, the most
    popular one ever!


    Biden's current approval rating of 43.1% (538's weighted average)
    is higher than Trump's at this stage (and indeed over almost all
    of) his presidency.

    Guess which one has claimed to be "the most popular one ever!"

    I don't have to guess, the brilliant Biden got more votes then any
    president ever. ( so they say )

    So says totaling up the official count in all the states plus DC (not
    that it is relevant to the claims at hand). Note that multiple audits, reviews, and court cases have found absolutely no evidence of
    significant fraud or error that would change that assessment. But the
    lies (and conditions of pathological denial) continue.

    --
    Mark Jackson - https://mark-jackson.online/
    As for behavior, I have shocking news:
    Physicists can be arrogant. - Mike Tamor
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 13 17:06:15 2022
    On Thursday, January 13, 2022 at 3:34:30 PM UTC-7, Mark Jackson wrote:

    So says totaling up the official count in all the states plus DC (not
    that it is relevant to the claims at hand). Note that multiple audits, reviews, and court cases have found absolutely no evidence of
    significant fraud or error that would change that assessment. But the
    lies (and conditions of pathological denial) continue.

    yawn
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 09:49:32 2022
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:53:30 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/13/22 12:24 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:18:04 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/13/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:57:09 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" >>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary
    world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ? >>>>>>>>>
    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making
    up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already >>>>>> be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as
    well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    My reaction was to the one who claimed that everyone who is not boosted >>>>> is not sane.

    Then deal with that person without labelling me and people like me as
    BRAINWASHED.

    I didn't, you did that yourself.
    What I said ( in one sentence ) that brainwashed people are vaccinated
    and boosted, what I didn't say is that all vaccinated people where
    brainwashed.

    Nope, as already explained to you, the OP, according to you, was
    including *everyone* in his claim. You simply changed the word "sane"
    to "BRAINWASHED" so your comment equally applied to *everyone*.

    Now why don't you write down that sentence, read it out loud and let is
    sink in.
    Maybe, just maybe you will found out that it then says BRAINWASHED
    people are vaccinated.

    I don't know what that mental wriggling is supposed to achieve.


    Spoiler : that is not the same as vaccinated people are brainwashed.



    To be fair to you and seeing how you attack me, yup YOU are brainwashed. >>>

    So no matter if you are a healthy teenager with ZERO change of serious >>>>> health issues with Covid.
    No matter if you already had covid and recovered and therefore have a >>>>> superior immunity compared to the "vaccines" that where made for the >>>>> extinguished versions of the Virus.

    Now we have Omicron, which is like a cold after you have been vaccinated >>>>> or had a previous infection.

    There are almost 20K people in hospital with Covid right now in the UK >>>> alone. How many do you reckon are in hospital with the cold?

    I don't know, in SA the hospitals are empty with a 20% vaccination rate.

    I'll rephrase my question. There are currently 8.5K people in hospital
    in South Africa with Covid [1]. Do you know anyone in hospital with
    the cold?

    Well at the moment I don't have friends in hospitals but I am 100% sure >there are people in hospitals which have a cold.

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.

    Doctors say that a high percentage of those
    registered Covid patients where accidental, meaning they didn't even
    knew they had it until they where tested in the hospital.
    Still the numbers working out as 0.01% of the population.
    Not many on ventilators and no long hospital stay.

    [1]
    https://www.nicd.ac.za/diseases-a-z-index/disease-index-covid-19/surveillance-reports/daily-hospital-surveillance-datcov-report/


    No need for boosters at all although you have more change of getting it >>>>> at after 2 jabs, compared to no jabs of a booster :-).

    All the top medical experts state

    Starting with such a statement, is childish and make any discussion
    impossible, are you aware of that?

    How so? If you have a medical problem do you go to a doctor or do you
    go looking for some self-declared expert on social media?

    Claiming something foolish as ALL TOP EXPERTS....
    You really don't understand what is wrong with that?
    If I can name one single expert who doesn't agree with your baseless >statement, what will you do, claiming it is a conspiracy theorist?

    Why don't you then.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?





    that the booster significantly
    increases protection and significantl* reduces the chances of
    hospitalisation.

    Pfizer you mean?
    Can you show data of that? We are talking about Omicron now you know.

    How about the scientists in your own country:

    "The scientists [in South Africa] concluded that "previous infection,
    followed by vaccination - or likely a booster - is probably protective
    against omicron, and almost certainly against severe disease."

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/14/covid-booster-dose-is-crucial-against-omicron-variant-heres-why.html
    The article summarises results from all around the world, all saying
    the same thing.

    Well as you can read, that article is remarkably vague and they use
    terms as
    "probably" and "almost" along with a couple obvious things like previous >infections in addition to boosters will likely improve protection.
    They avoid naming the fact that SA shows that unvaccinated people
    recover very well from Omicron.

    So long as they don't die from it.

    "WHO says omicron is life threatening for unvaccinated, elderly and
    people with underlying conditions.

    Dr. Mike Ryan, director of the WHO's health emergencies program, said
    omicron represents a "massive threat" to the lives of the
    unvaccinated."

    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/11/who-says-omicron-is-life-threatening-for-unvaccinated-elderly-underlying-conditions.html







    Just like in F1, you reckon you know better than the
    qualified experts.

    Another off topic childish baseless labeling, are you aware of what you
    are doing?


    I didn't said EVERYBODY who got jabbed and got a booster is brainwashed. >>>>
    You've just said that the person you responded to claimed that
    everyone who is not boosted is not sane. You simply changed the word
    "sane" to BRAINWASHED which meant you too were referring to everyone.

    Nope, brainwashed people go blindly for boosters every month.

    I have an underlying cardiac condition for which I take 8 tablets
    every day. Does that make me brainwashed?

    No, that's not the reason, you have a very good reason for doing what
    you do.
    It's that part where you attack me and label me as a "conspiracy fueled >ant-vaxxer " that is what shows you are brainwashed.

    Not every vaccinated human is brainwashed but you most certainly are.


    There are good reasons for some people to do so, there are equally good >>>>> reasons for a lot of people not to take boosters or no experimental jabs >>>>> at all.>



    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by >>>>>>>> "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance >>>>>>>> to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be >>>>>>> more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some >>>>>>>> think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't >>>>>>>> seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a >>>>>>> multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So >>>>>> be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    My question still stands, can a multiple vaccinated person be a anti-vaxxer?
    That is a pretty ludicrous statement IMO

    Answered in my earlier response to your preceeding post.

    Remind me or are you realizing now how foolish your suggestion is.

    Whilst recognising your intellectual limitations, I did think you
    could find a post from yesterday that was a direct response to one
    from you. Anyway, here is what I said:

    "My original post was in the context of *Covid vaccination*. From
    everything you have said (and not said) so far, I continue to believe
    that in that context of Covid vaccination, you do belong to that group
    of anti-vaxxers who are fueled by some sort of conspiracy that the
    Covid vaccine is really some nefarious plot by "them". I'm open to
    being convinced otherwise but evasion won't convince me.

    OK so in your mind its in the context of Covid vaccination, which means
    not against vaccinations as such.
    Which means labeling people as anti-vaxxers is a very stupid expression.
    The addition of "conspiracy" makes it even worse, it not about
    discussing anything it's solely about disqualifying people with another >opinion no matter what.
    I find it extremely arrogant to try disqualify people with another
    opinion then the MSM allows.
    My experience is that people with second thoughts about the one fits all
    vaccination solution are way more informed then the ones who blindly
    follow the MSM.

    BTW, in regard to your "multiple vaccinations", how many of those were
    voluntary on your part i.e. not decided by your parents when you were
    a child or necessary for a visa to enter some country?"

    Your lack of response to my final question suggests that none of your
    multiple vaccines was voluntary on your part.

    A had a few for vacations they where voluntary.


    Edmund
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 11:36:46 2022
    On 1/14/22 10:49 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:53:30 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/13/22 12:24 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:18:04 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/13/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:57:09 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary
    world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ? >>>>>>>>>>
    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making
    up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already >>>>>>> be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as >>>>>>> well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    My reaction was to the one who claimed that everyone who is not boosted >>>>>> is not sane.

    Then deal with that person without labelling me and people like me as >>>>> BRAINWASHED.

    I didn't, you did that yourself.
    What I said ( in one sentence ) that brainwashed people are vaccinated >>>> and boosted, what I didn't say is that all vaccinated people where
    brainwashed.

    Nope, as already explained to you, the OP, according to you, was
    including *everyone* in his claim. You simply changed the word "sane"
    to "BRAINWASHED" so your comment equally applied to *everyone*.

    Now why don't you write down that sentence, read it out loud and let is
    sink in.
    Maybe, just maybe you will found out that it then says BRAINWASHED
    people are vaccinated.

    I don't know what that mental wriggling is supposed to achieve.

    Think about it a little longer then, it isn't rocket science.


    Spoiler : that is not the same as vaccinated people are brainwashed.



    To be fair to you and seeing how you attack me, yup YOU are brainwashed. >>>>

    So no matter if you are a healthy teenager with ZERO change of serious >>>>>> health issues with Covid.
    No matter if you already had covid and recovered and therefore have a >>>>>> superior immunity compared to the "vaccines" that where made for the >>>>>> extinguished versions of the Virus.

    Now we have Omicron, which is like a cold after you have been vaccinated >>>>>> or had a previous infection.

    There are almost 20K people in hospital with Covid right now in the UK >>>>> alone. How many do you reckon are in hospital with the cold?

    I don't know, in SA the hospitals are empty with a 20% vaccination rate. >>>
    I'll rephrase my question. There are currently 8.5K people in hospital
    in South Africa with Covid [1]. Do you know anyone in hospital with
    the cold?

    Well at the moment I don't have friends in hospitals but I am 100% sure
    there are people in hospitals which have a cold.

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.

    You may suspect what you want, fact are people admitted with a broken
    leg get tested, if positive they going in the records as Covid patients.

    Doctors say that a high percentage of those
    registered Covid patients where accidental, meaning they didn't even
    knew they had it until they where tested in the hospital.
    Still the numbers working out as 0.01% of the population.
    Not many on ventilators and no long hospital stay.

    [1]
    https://www.nicd.ac.za/diseases-a-z-index/disease-index-covid-19/surveillance-reports/daily-hospital-surveillance-datcov-report/


    No need for boosters at all although you have more change of getting it >>>>>> at after 2 jabs, compared to no jabs of a booster :-).

    All the top medical experts state

    Starting with such a statement, is childish and make any discussion
    impossible, are you aware of that?

    How so? If you have a medical problem do you go to a doctor or do you
    go looking for some self-declared expert on social media?

    Claiming something foolish as ALL TOP EXPERTS....
    You really don't understand what is wrong with that?
    If I can name one single expert who doesn't agree with your baseless
    statement, what will you do, claiming it is a conspiracy theorist?

    Why don't you then.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?

    It doesn't surprise me you don't even know.
    Google it yourself, you may find it as long as google haven't deleted
    him completely.






    that the booster significantly
    increases protection and significantl* reduces the chances of
    hospitalisation.

    Pfizer you mean?
    Can you show data of that? We are talking about Omicron now you know.

    How about the scientists in your own country:

    "The scientists [in South Africa] concluded that "previous infection,
    followed by vaccination - or likely a booster - is probably protective
    against omicron, and almost certainly against severe disease."

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/14/covid-booster-dose-is-crucial-against-omicron-variant-heres-why.html
    The article summarises results from all around the world, all saying
    the same thing.

    Well as you can read, that article is remarkably vague and they use
    terms as
    "probably" and "almost" along with a couple obvious things like previous
    infections in addition to boosters will likely improve protection.
    They avoid naming the fact that SA shows that unvaccinated people
    recover very well from Omicron.

    So long as they don't die from it.

    Correct, now just for fun take a look at the facts in SA, what does that
    tell you?
    Empty hospitals, hardly any deaths and all that with a 20% vaccination rate. What is your explanation?

    "WHO says omicron is life threatening for unvaccinated, elderly and
    people with underlying conditions.

    I don't care what anyone says if it contradicts the plain facts.

    Dr. Mike Ryan, director of the WHO's health emergencies program, said
    omicron represents a "massive threat" to the lives of the
    unvaccinated."

    He has the right to have an opinion too.
    How about the previously infected?
    Al figures I have seen are far less dramatic then the previous Mutations.


    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/11/who-says-omicron-is-life-threatening-for-unvaccinated-elderly-underlying-conditions.html









    Just like in F1, you reckon you know better than the
    qualified experts.

    Another off topic childish baseless labeling, are you aware of what you >>>> are doing?


    I didn't said EVERYBODY who got jabbed and got a booster is brainwashed. >>>>>
    You've just said that the person you responded to claimed that
    everyone who is not boosted is not sane. You simply changed the word >>>>> "sane" to BRAINWASHED which meant you too were referring to everyone. >>>>
    Nope, brainwashed people go blindly for boosters every month.

    I have an underlying cardiac condition for which I take 8 tablets
    every day. Does that make me brainwashed?

    No, that's not the reason, you have a very good reason for doing what
    you do.
    It's that part where you attack me and label me as a "conspiracy fueled
    ant-vaxxer " that is what shows you are brainwashed.

    Not every vaccinated human is brainwashed but you most certainly are. >>>>>

    There are good reasons for some people to do so, there are equally good >>>>>> reasons for a lot of people not to take boosters or no experimental jabs >>>>>> at all.>



    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by
    "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance
    to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be >>>>>>>> more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some >>>>>>>>> think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't >>>>>>>>> seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a >>>>>>>> multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So >>>>>>> be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    My question still stands, can a multiple vaccinated person be a anti-vaxxer?
    That is a pretty ludicrous statement IMO

    Answered in my earlier response to your preceeding post.

    Remind me or are you realizing now how foolish your suggestion is.

    Whilst recognising your intellectual limitations, I did think you
    could find a post from yesterday that was a direct response to one
    from you. Anyway, here is what I said:

    "My original post was in the context of *Covid vaccination*. From
    everything you have said (and not said) so far, I continue to believe
    that in that context of Covid vaccination, you do belong to that group
    of anti-vaxxers who are fueled by some sort of conspiracy that the
    Covid vaccine is really some nefarious plot by "them". I'm open to
    being convinced otherwise but evasion won't convince me.

    OK so in your mind its in the context of Covid vaccination, which means
    not against vaccinations as such.
    Which means labeling people as anti-vaxxers is a very stupid expression.
    The addition of "conspiracy" makes it even worse, it not about
    discussing anything it's solely about disqualifying people with another
    opinion no matter what.
    I find it extremely arrogant to try disqualify people with another
    opinion then the MSM allows.
    My experience is that people with second thoughts about the one fits all
    vaccination solution are way more informed then the ones who blindly
    follow the MSM.

    BTW, in regard to your "multiple vaccinations", how many of those were
    voluntary on your part i.e. not decided by your parents when you were
    a child or necessary for a visa to enter some country?"

    Your lack of response to my final question suggests that none of your
    multiple vaccines was voluntary on your part.

    A had a few for vacations they where voluntary.


    Edmund


    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 16:58:18 2022
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:36:46 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/14/22 10:49 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 13:53:30 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/13/22 12:24 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 11:18:04 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>
    On 1/13/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:57:09 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>
    On 1/11/22 1:28 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 12:18:57 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
    On 1/11/22 9:51 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 17:12:34 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 5:08 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 12:08:05 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/10/22 10:56 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 15:00:06 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/22 3:38 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 9/01/2022 12:42 pm, Tedros Fauci wrote:
    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of
    "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.

    Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Make that "BRAINWASHED "

    would already be
    double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as well.

    So Edmund is a conspiracy fueled ant-vaxxer ... gosh, who would have
    thought!

    Ah another brainless conspiracy accuser, what conspiracy might that be sir?
    FYI I have a number of vaccinations, do I qualify in your imaginary
    world for ant-vaxxer whatever that might be?

    So why are you describing vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED ? >>>>>>>>>>>
    Try answering the question.

    Your description of vaccinated people as BRAINWASHED

    Read again what I said and to what I responded, this time without making
    up your own brainless additions.

    ================================
    ~misfit~:
    "Your question doesn't make any sense as "anybody sane" [would already >>>>>>>> be double vaccinated and, by the Melbourne GP, likely boosted as >>>>>>>> well.]

    You:
    "Make that "BRAINWASHED"
    ===============================

    Feel free to point out what part of your response I missed.

    My reaction was to the one who claimed that everyone who is not boosted >>>>>>> is not sane.

    Then deal with that person without labelling me and people like me as >>>>>> BRAINWASHED.

    I didn't, you did that yourself.
    What I said ( in one sentence ) that brainwashed people are vaccinated >>>>> and boosted, what I didn't say is that all vaccinated people where
    brainwashed.

    Nope, as already explained to you, the OP, according to you, was
    including *everyone* in his claim. You simply changed the word "sane"
    to "BRAINWASHED" so your comment equally applied to *everyone*.

    Now why don't you write down that sentence, read it out loud and let is
    sink in.
    Maybe, just maybe you will found out that it then says BRAINWASHED
    people are vaccinated.

    I don't know what that mental wriggling is supposed to achieve.

    Think about it a little longer then, it isn't rocket science.


    Spoiler : that is not the same as vaccinated people are brainwashed.



    To be fair to you and seeing how you attack me, yup YOU are brainwashed. >>>>>

    So no matter if you are a healthy teenager with ZERO change of serious >>>>>>> health issues with Covid.
    No matter if you already had covid and recovered and therefore have a >>>>>>> superior immunity compared to the "vaccines" that where made for the >>>>>>> extinguished versions of the Virus.

    Now we have Omicron, which is like a cold after you have been vaccinated
    or had a previous infection.

    There are almost 20K people in hospital with Covid right now in the UK >>>>>> alone. How many do you reckon are in hospital with the cold?

    I don't know, in SA the hospitals are empty with a 20% vaccination rate. >>>>
    I'll rephrase my question. There are currently 8.5K people in hospital >>>> in South Africa with Covid [1]. Do you know anyone in hospital with
    the cold?

    Well at the moment I don't have friends in hospitals but I am 100% sure
    there are people in hospitals which have a cold.

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.

    You may suspect what you want, fact are people admitted with a broken
    leg get tested, if positive they going in the records as Covid patients.

    Doctors say that a high percentage of those
    registered Covid patients where accidental, meaning they didn't even
    knew they had it until they where tested in the hospital.
    Still the numbers working out as 0.01% of the population.
    Not many on ventilators and no long hospital stay.

    [1]
    https://www.nicd.ac.za/diseases-a-z-index/disease-index-covid-19/surveillance-reports/daily-hospital-surveillance-datcov-report/


    No need for boosters at all although you have more change of getting it >>>>>>> at after 2 jabs, compared to no jabs of a booster :-).

    All the top medical experts state

    Starting with such a statement, is childish and make any discussion
    impossible, are you aware of that?

    How so? If you have a medical problem do you go to a doctor or do you
    go looking for some self-declared expert on social media?

    Claiming something foolish as ALL TOP EXPERTS....
    You really don't understand what is wrong with that?
    If I can name one single expert who doesn't agree with your baseless
    statement, what will you do, claiming it is a conspiracy theorist?

    Why don't you then.

    So you can't name one.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?

    It doesn't surprise me you don't even know.
    Google it yourself,

    Nope, you are making the claim, it's up to you to provide the
    evidence. Clearly you can't.

    you may find it as long as google haven't deleted
    him completely.

    LOL, spoken like a true conspiracist.







    that the booster significantly
    increases protection and significantl* reduces the chances of
    hospitalisation.

    Pfizer you mean?
    Can you show data of that? We are talking about Omicron now you know. >>>>
    How about the scientists in your own country:

    "The scientists [in South Africa] concluded that "previous infection,
    followed by vaccination - or likely a booster - is probably protective >>>> against omicron, and almost certainly against severe disease."

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/14/covid-booster-dose-is-crucial-against-omicron-variant-heres-why.html
    The article summarises results from all around the world, all saying
    the same thing.

    Well as you can read, that article is remarkably vague and they use
    terms as
    "probably" and "almost" along with a couple obvious things like previous >>> infections in addition to boosters will likely improve protection.
    They avoid naming the fact that SA shows that unvaccinated people
    recover very well from Omicron.

    So long as they don't die from it.

    Correct, now just for fun take a look at the facts in SA, what does that >tell you?
    Empty hospitals,

    I wouldn't regard 8.14K people still in hospital with Covid after the
    Omicron peak has passed as "empty"..

    hardly any deaths

    I wouldn't regard 3K excess deaths per week as "hardly any".

    and all that with a 20% vaccination rate.
    What is your explanation?

    Clealy I have different values on sickness and death rates than you
    do.


    "WHO says omicron is life threatening for unvaccinated, elderly and
    people with underlying conditions.

    I don't care what anyone says if it contradicts the plain facts.

    Dr. Mike Ryan, director of the WHO's health emergencies program, said
    omicron represents a "massive threat" to the lives of the
    unvaccinated."

    He has the right to have an opinion too.

    As a WHO director, his opinion is worth a lot more than yours or the
    opinion of some guy you saw something about on the Internet but he
    might not be there anymore.


    How about the previously infected?
    Al figures I have seen are far less dramatic then the previous Mutations.


    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/01/11/who-says-omicron-is-life-threatening-for-unvaccinated-elderly-underlying-conditions.html









    Just like in F1, you reckon you know better than the
    qualified experts.

    Another off topic childish baseless labeling, are you aware of what you >>>>> are doing?


    I didn't said EVERYBODY who got jabbed and got a booster is brainwashed.

    You've just said that the person you responded to claimed that
    everyone who is not boosted is not sane. You simply changed the word >>>>>> "sane" to BRAINWASHED which meant you too were referring to everyone. >>>>>
    Nope, brainwashed people go blindly for boosters every month.

    I have an underlying cardiac condition for which I take 8 tablets
    every day. Does that make me brainwashed?

    No, that's not the reason, you have a very good reason for doing what
    you do.
    It's that part where you attack me and label me as a "conspiracy fueled >>> ant-vaxxer " that is what shows you are brainwashed.

    Not every vaccinated human is brainwashed but you most certainly are. >>>>>>

    There are good reasons for some people to do so, there are equally good >>>>>>> reasons for a lot of people not to take boosters or no experimental jabs
    at all.>



    suggests that you
    have bought into the conspiracy that Covid vaccination is some plot by
    "them"[1] to subvert people for some nefarious reason. Your reluctance
    to offer an alternative explanation tends to confirm that.

    If someone has a question for me without foolish MSM insults I'll be >>>>>>>>> more then happy to respond, you did not qualify.

    IOW, no alternative explanation available.



    [1] Who exactly "they" are seems to vary among anti-vaxxers; some >>>>>>>>>> think it is the government, some think it is Bill Gates, others don't
    seem to have any real idea who they are talking about.

    So my question was do I qualify for that in your weird world as a >>>>>>>>> multiple vaccinated person?

    I note that you don't include Covid vaccination in your "multiple". So >>>>>>>> be straight about it - are you Covid vaccinated?

    My question still stands, can a multiple vaccinated person be a anti-vaxxer?
    That is a pretty ludicrous statement IMO

    Answered in my earlier response to your preceeding post.

    Remind me or are you realizing now how foolish your suggestion is.

    Whilst recognising your intellectual limitations, I did think you
    could find a post from yesterday that was a direct response to one
    from you. Anyway, here is what I said:

    "My original post was in the context of *Covid vaccination*. From
    everything you have said (and not said) so far, I continue to believe
    that in that context of Covid vaccination, you do belong to that group >>>> of anti-vaxxers who are fueled by some sort of conspiracy that the
    Covid vaccine is really some nefarious plot by "them". I'm open to
    being convinced otherwise but evasion won't convince me.

    OK so in your mind its in the context of Covid vaccination, which means
    not against vaccinations as such.
    Which means labeling people as anti-vaxxers is a very stupid expression. >>> The addition of "conspiracy" makes it even worse, it not about
    discussing anything it's solely about disqualifying people with another
    opinion no matter what.
    I find it extremely arrogant to try disqualify people with another
    opinion then the MSM allows.
    My experience is that people with second thoughts about the one fits all >>> vaccination solution are way more informed then the ones who blindly
    follow the MSM.

    BTW, in regard to your "multiple vaccinations", how many of those were >>>> voluntary on your part i.e. not decided by your parents when you were
    a child or necessary for a visa to enter some country?"

    Your lack of response to my final question suggests that none of your
    multiple vaccines was voluntary on your part.

    A had a few for vacations they where voluntary.


    Edmund
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From build@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 19:14:46 2022
    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC+11, martin wrote:
    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.
    Same for Covid !
    "rCyUp to halfrCO of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something totally different and were positive in routine testing"
    The Prime Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid hospitalisations rCo after it was revealed that hundreds of patients listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the virus at all.
    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb
    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of Covid. The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of Covid".
    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old. Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for every column inch they can get.
    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies. I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know 'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.
    build
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 19:25:12 2022
    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:14:47 PM UTC-7, build wrote:
    Same for Covid !

    "rCyUp to halfrCO of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something totally different and were positive in routine testing"
    The Prime Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid hospitalisations rCo after it was revealed that hundreds of patients listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the virus at all.
    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb

    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of Covid. The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of Covid".

    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old. Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for every column inch they can get.

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies. I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know 'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.
    Thank you Dr Fuckhead
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 19:34:44 2022
    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:14:47 PM UTC-7, build wrote:

    BTW, I am vaccinated

    and gay?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From build@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 19:54:26 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:58:19 AM UTC+11, martin... wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:36:46 +0100, Edmund <nom... wrote:
    So you can't name one.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?

    It doesn't surprise me you don't even know.
    Google it yourself,
    Nope, you are making the claim, it's up to you to provide the
    evidence. Clearly you can't.
    Martin,
    Clearly he can. You are in denial or you've searched and did not like what you found. I searched and found him easily.
    Dr. Robert Malone who was involved in the invention of the mRNA technology.
    He is a skeptic not an anti-vaxxer and it is now turning out he was correct. The vaccines are no longer effective, etc. I suggest you keep informed.
    It's interesting and laughable that he's been labelled an "anti-vaxxer". You gotta be kidding me. And, he is not "trying so hard to undermine its use" as some idiots write. Read or listen to what he says, not what is written or said about him. Although I suspect you will do the opposite are read about him and ignore what he says, c'est la vie.
    BTW: Don't get sucked into the rubbish generated by the tiny minority of real 'anti-vaxxer' nutters. They are as twisted as the blindlt pro-vax nutters. There is a sensible middle ground, find it. Read the research papers, reviews and the less sensational journalists. It's information worth evaluating.
    build
    you may find it as long as google haven't deleted
    him completely.
    LOL, spoken like a true conspiracist.
    No. As you will find out he is being banned and deleted. It's sad when the crowd cheers the authoritarians.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From build@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 20:45:41 2022
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:38:09 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 07:42:34 +0800, Tedros Fauci wrote:

    If unvaccinated, get put in "immigration hotel" with a bunch of "asylum seekers" who are more accustomed to cockroaches and bed bugs.
    You can't bring your private chef either.
    or simply follow their rules, don't lie*, & get in simple

    Joker did follow the rules. That is why the court overturned the first decision to revoke his VISA.
    I suggest you read the courts decision.
    Now the Minister has used his discretionary powers and here is his statement about why:
    "rCLMr DjokovicrCOs presence in Australia may pose a health risk to the Australian community, in that his presence in Australia may foster anti-vaccination sentiment leading to other unvaccinated persons refusing to become vaccinated, other unvaccinated persons being reinforced in their existing view not to become vaccinated, and/or a reduction in the uptake of booster vaccines,rCY Mr Hawke wrote."
    Also: The argument Border Force officials used to rescind DjokovicrCOs visa the first time rCo that his recent Covid infection in mid-December was insufficient to earn him an exemption to the requirement that incoming travellers be vaccinated against Covid rCo has been abandoned.
    This is a very embarrassing far cup by all concerned.
    buid.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From build@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 20:51:47 2022
    On Monday, January 10, 2022 at 12:50:16 PM UTC+11, XYXPDQ wrote:
    If your fully injected and get sick the you get treated as a criminal.

    That is silly? Why would you say that?
    My son is vaccinated and currently has covid, he is not being treated "as a criminal". In Australia (93% vaccinated) heaps of people including many that I know have Covid, no one has said they are being "treated as a criminal."
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Brian Lawrence@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 10:20:27 2022
    On 15/01/2022 03:14, build wrote:
    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC+11, martin wrote:

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.

    Same for Covid !

    "rCyUp to halfrCO of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something totally different and were positive in routine testing"
    The Prime Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid hospitalisations rCo after it was revealed that hundreds of patients listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the virus at all.
    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb

    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of Covid. The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of Covid".

    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old. Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for every column inch they can get.

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies. I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know 'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.


    I researched this a couple of days ago - if someone goes into hospital
    for any non-COVID reason, they WILL BE tested for COVID, and indeed many
    of them will test positive. This is especially true since Omicron
    appeared, and is therefore an unsurprising stat. However, all hospital
    patients diagnosed with COVID-19 HAVE TO BE treated in isolation from
    any non-COVID patients. The net result is that no matter why they were hospitalised they end up in the COVID wards and are using all the
    resources allocated to treat COVID patients. The stats showing the
    differential are irrelevant to the situation in hospitals.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 10:27:46 2022
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:54:26 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:58:19 AM UTC+11, martin... wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:36:46 +0100, Edmund <nom... wrote:

    So you can't name one.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?

    It doesn't surprise me you don't even know.
    Google it yourself,
    Nope, you are making the claim, it's up to you to provide the
    evidence. Clearly you can't.

    Martin,
    Clearly he can. You are in denial or you've searched and did not like what you found. I searched and found him easily.

    Where did you get your information?

    Here are what I would regard as two reliable sources you might want to
    check out:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2021/08/robert-malone-vaccine-inventor-vaccine-skeptic/619734/

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2022/01/02/what-is-mass-formation-psychosis-robert-malone-makes-covid-19-vaccine-claims-on-joe-rogan-show/?sh=45256a431d4c

    And if you want to know a bit more about the real history of mRNA
    vaccines, try this from one of the top science journals:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02483-w


    Dr. Robert Malone who was involved in the invention of the mRNA technology.

    Edmund claimed he was the *inventor*which is clearly wrong but even
    describing him as "involved" is a bit of a stretch. He did make an
    important discovery 30 years ago - showing how RNA could be delivered
    into cells using lipids - but describing him as involved in mRNA is
    like saying John Boyd Dunlop was involved in the devlopment of F1 (or, according to Edmund, the inventor of F1).


    He is a skeptic not an anti-vaxxer and it is now turning out he was correct. The vaccines are no longer effective, etc. I suggest you keep informed.

    Please provide a reliable source saying that vaccines are no longer
    effective.

    It's interesting and laughable that he's been labelled an "anti-vaxxer". You gotta be kidding me. And, he is not "trying so hard to undermine its use" as some idiots write. Read or listen to what he says, not what is written or said about him. Although I suspect you will do the opposite are read about him and ignore what he says, c'est la vie.

    He is a paranoid who suffers from a persecution complex; his wife
    describes him as a genius scientist who is "largely unknown by the
    scientific establishment because of abuses by individuals to secure
    their own place in the history books." (See the Atlantic article
    referenced above.)

    He's a perfect poster boy for the conspiracists.


    BTW: Don't get sucked into the rubbish generated by the tiny minority of real 'anti-vaxxer' nutters. They are as twisted as the blindlt pro-vax nutters. There is a sensible middle ground, find it.

    I'm already in the middle ground. I know that medicine and science
    don't get everything right but they get it right *most* of the time so
    I'm going to take my advice from qualified people, not from
    self-appointed experts on social media.

    Read the research papers, reviews and the less sensational journalists. It's information worth evaluating.

    Give me an example of any such papers that support Malone and his
    claims.


    build


    you may find it as long as google haven't deleted
    him completely.
    LOL, spoken like a true conspiracist.

    No. As you will find out he is being banned and deleted. It's sad when the crowd cheers the authoritarians.

    No, it's sad when people are allowed to propagate false information
    that can put people's lives at risk and decent-minded people think
    that is somehow an infringement of their rights. To give you a
    different example, I recently got a Facebook message from one of my
    friends - a generally sensible lady, who likes to help people -
    obviously reacting to one of these "Important, send this to all your
    friends" type things. It was about the actions you should take if
    someone appears to be taking a stroke. It said that the most urgent
    thing is to get the person calmed down, set them into a chair and make
    them a nice cup of tea or coffee, then phone for an ambulance. That is
    the complete opposite of what you should do! The most urgent thing to
    do if someone is having a stroke is to make an emergency call for an
    ambulance as there is a direct correlation between ambulance response
    time and their chances of survival and recovery. Also, you should
    never give any food or liquid to anyone having a stroke or heart
    attack except sips of water as it could interfere with the emergency
    medical treatment they could get.

    Do you think it is ok for that sort of stuff to be propagated through
    social media? If not, then what is the difference between that and bum information about vaccines?

    ====================================

    [1] That Atlantic article has a link to another article that is worth
    reading. It's about a carelessly worded paragraph in a USA Today
    article that said the opposite of what they meant to say. The
    anti-vaxxers, including Malone, jumped upon it as backing for their
    wild claims. When USA Today spotted the error, they deleted the
    paragraph and the ant-vaxxers then jumped on that as a cover-up! https://thedispatch.com/p/how-misinformation-starts
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 10:49:45 2022
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:14:46 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC+11, martin wrote:

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.

    Same for Covid !

    "'Up to half' of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something totally different and were positive in routine testing"
    The Prime Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid hospitalisations - after it was revealed that hundreds of patients listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the virus at all.
    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb

    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of Covid.

    Because Covid hit us so quickly and most of what has been done has
    been reactive rather than proactive, much of the statistic gathering
    has been less rigorous than usual but that doesn't change the overall
    picture of Covid being a deadly disease and vaccination being a major
    factor in reducing that danger.

    FWIW, I think the response to Omicron turned out to be an
    over-reaction but it was so contagious that action had to be taken
    quickly; I'd far rather be in the position of having over-reacted than under-reacting and ending up with thousands if not millions of
    preventable deaths. I also think we should not let our guard down
    because Omicron turned out relatively mild - God only knows what other
    variants are lurking around the corner.


    The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of Covid".

    I haven't seen that about ICU and the number of deaths, can you give a
    source?


    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old. Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for every column inch they can get.

    You need to be careful of extrapolating personal experience to the
    wider population. We all know guys who have smoked all their lives and
    lived to a ripe old age and also known people who never smoked and
    died young. Does that mean smoking isn't really bad for you?


    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies. I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know 'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.


    Individual rights have to be balanced against public interests. Take
    smoking again; I don't know about Australia but in this part of the
    world, smoking is now banned in all public places - is that an
    infringement on the rights of smokers? Of course they can smoke in
    private places and to me, that is the same with people refusing to be vaccinated [1], they certainly have the right to refuse but they can't
    complain when they are restricted in their mixing with those who are
    vaccinated and putting them at risk.

    In regard to the right to promote their views, do you think smokers
    who reject the science linking smoking to cancer and heart disease
    should be given free rein on social media to promote their claims that
    the science is really all a conspiracy ?


    [1] For clarity, I'm talking about people who refuse vaccination for
    no good reason; I'm not talking about people who have genuine medical
    grounds.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 12:38:37 2022
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:14:46 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC+11, martin wrote:

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.

    Same for Covid !

    "aUp to halfA of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something totally different and were positive in routine testing"
    The Prime Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid hospitalisations u after it was revealed that hundreds of patients listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the virus at all.
    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb

    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of Covid. The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of Covid".

    Figures here are for UK but I wouldn't expect Australia to be all that different.

    https://fullfact.org/health/unvaccinated-icu-channel4-icnarc/

    They show that by November (last accurate figures available),
    unvaccinated in ICU had dropped to about 47% from over 70% in the
    summer. Most of that reduction, however, was due to fact that most
    people had been vaccinated by that stage and that 47% was coming from
    somewhere between 10 and 20% of the population i.e. unvaccinated were
    around 5 times more likely to end up in ICU.

    As the figures only go to November, they don't take Omicron into
    account but anecdotal accounts suggest something similar if not worse.
    Either way, as I've said elsewhere, we should not read too much into
    what has happened with Omicron or assume it is the last variant we
    will encounter.


    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old. Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for every column inch they can get.

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies. I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know 'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.

    build
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:33:42 2022
    On 1/15/22 11:27 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:54:26 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:58:19 AM UTC+11, martin... wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:36:46 +0100, Edmund <nom... wrote:

    So you can't name one.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?

    It doesn't surprise me you don't even know.
    Google it yourself,
    Nope, you are making the claim, it's up to you to provide the
    evidence. Clearly you can't.

    Martin,
    Clearly he can. You are in denial or you've searched and did not like what you found. I searched and found him easily.

    Where did you get your information?

    Here are what I would regard as two reliable sources you might want to
    check out:

    I spent a lot of my time to provide you with some -other then MSM
    propaganda- but you are not clearly worth it, so I won't waste more time
    for you.
    You tempt me to insult you the way you insult me but I realize you are a brainwashed victim of the propaganda you get shoved thru your throat
    every day.

    You already demonstrated you prefer to be insulted by your own twist of
    my posting and although I made it very clear that
    brainwashed people are vaccinated is not the same as vaccinated people
    are brainwashed.

    Same a women are human is not the same a human are women...
    You are too stuburn to admit you got it wrong.
    No matter how many sources I will show you, you will always deny it and
    go back to the manipulated and censored MSM.
    You will only accept fake news.
    Fine with me.

    Edmund



    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan LeHun@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:08:10 2022
    In article <srn0ce$iib$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    [...]
    Demanding people to let them inject an experimental drug with an
    emergency allowance that is not even out of the required testing period
    and long term effects are unknown.

    It is not a drug. That is disinformation aimed at swaying the opinions
    of the gullible and naive. The anti-vaccine lobby is so full of
    disinformation that one might be led to assume their arguments have
    little to no substance whatsoever.

    The long term effects of Covid are well known. The long term effects of
    both mRNA and viral vector vaccines (Covid vaccines are one of those two types) are also well known. Claiming that we "don't know the long term
    effects of Covid vaccines" is a bit like saying we don't know the safety
    of a Jet aircraft because someone installed type of microwave oven in
    the galley.

    Even the two major side effects that surfaced after the vaccine release
    (blood clotting & heart inflammation) are so incredibly rare that the
    full regular testing regime would probably not have detected them.




    Having said all that, I would also agree that many of the pro-vaxers
    have also made unsubstantiated or exaggerated claims and they do
    themselves a disservice by doing so. They don't need to.


    [...]



    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this prime peace
    of human intellect
    as your President, the most popular one ever!
    I am sure US citizens are drunk of happiness ever since.

    I am Scottish. I did not vote for Trump. I certainly did not vote for
    Boris. I do not consider my personal politics to be left wing.


    --
    Alan LeHun
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:37:10 2022
    On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:33:42 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/15/22 11:27 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:54:26 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:58:19 AM UTC+11, martin... wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:36:46 +0100, Edmund <nom... wrote:

    So you can't name one.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?

    It doesn't surprise me you don't even know.
    Google it yourself,
    Nope, you are making the claim, it's up to you to provide the
    evidence. Clearly you can't.

    Martin,
    Clearly he can. You are in denial or you've searched and did not like what you found. I searched and found him easily.

    Where did you get your information?

    Here are what I would regard as two reliable sources you might want to
    check out:

    I spent a lot of my time to provide you with some -other then MSM
    propaganda

    No you haven't provided any information at all, you have made claims
    without citing a single source to support your opinions. Telling me to
    go Google it for myself doesn't cut it.


    - but you are not clearly worth it, so I won't waste more time
    for you.

    That's fine but I will continue to challenge any other baseless claims
    you make.

    You tempt me to insult you the way you insult me but I realize you are a >brainwashed victim of the propaganda you get shoved thru your throat
    every day.

    You already demonstrated you prefer to be insulted by your own twist of
    my posting and although I made it very clear that
    brainwashed people are vaccinated is not the same as vaccinated people
    are brainwashed.

    Same a women are human is not the same a human are women...
    You are too stuburn to admit you got it wrong.
    No matter how many sources I will show you, you will always deny it and
    go back to the manipulated and censored MSM.
    You will only accept fake news.

    A lot of projection in that paragraph!

    Fine with me.

    Edmund
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 15:02:34 2022
    On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:08:10 -0000, Alan LeHun <try@reply.to> wrote:

    In article <srn0ce$iib$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    [...]
    Demanding people to let them inject an experimental drug with an
    emergency allowance that is not even out of the required testing period
    and long term effects are unknown.

    It is not a drug. That is disinformation aimed at swaying the opinions
    of the gullible and naive. The anti-vaccine lobby is so full of >disinformation that one might be led to assume their arguments have
    little to no substance whatsoever.

    The long term effects of Covid are well known. The long term effects of
    both mRNA and viral vector vaccines (Covid vaccines are one of those two >types) are also well known. Claiming that we "don't know the long term >effects of Covid vaccines" is a bit like saying we don't know the safety
    of a Jet aircraft because someone installed type of microwave oven in
    the galley.


    There is also a lot of misinformation about shortcuts being taken in
    developing the vaccines. In reality, the exact same processes were
    followed as with any new vaccine, the difference here was that
    government provided funding allowed the pharmaceutical companies to
    move faster. Long story, short story - developing any new drug or
    medicine is a high-risk venture in *financial* terms - less than 10%
    make it through to the shelves. Because of that, companies proceed
    very slowly taking one small step at a time and pausing after each
    step to evaluate the results in both financial and medical potential.
    Only after careful - and usually lengthy - consideration will they
    proceed to the next step. In this case, the availability of government
    funding meant that they could ignore financial risks and push ahead
    far faster - but they still went through the exact same testing steps
    as in conventional testing.

    More detail here: https://news.uchicago.edu/story/how-were-researchers-able-develop-covid-19-vaccines-so-quickly

    Even the two major side effects that surfaced after the vaccine release >(blood clotting & heart inflammation) are so incredibly rare that the
    full regular testing regime would probably not have detected them.




    Having said all that, I would also agree that many of the pro-vaxers
    have also made unsubstantiated or exaggerated claims and they do
    themselves a disservice by doing so. They don't need to.


    [...]



    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this prime peace
    of human intellect
    as your President, the most popular one ever!
    I am sure US citizens are drunk of happiness ever since.

    I am Scottish. I did not vote for Trump. I certainly did not vote for
    Boris. I do not consider my personal politics to be left wing.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 16:28:38 2022
    On 1/15/22 3:37 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:33:42 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/15/22 11:27 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:54:26 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:58:19 AM UTC+11, martin... wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:36:46 +0100, Edmund <nom... wrote:

    So you can't name one.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?

    It doesn't surprise me you don't even know.
    Google it yourself,
    Nope, you are making the claim, it's up to you to provide the
    evidence. Clearly you can't.

    Martin,
    Clearly he can. You are in denial or you've searched and did not like what you found. I searched and found him easily.

    Where did you get your information?

    Here are what I would regard as two reliable sources you might want to
    check out:

    I spent a lot of my time to provide you with some -other then MSM
    propaganda

    No you haven't provided any information at all, you have made claims
    without citing a single source to support your opinions. Telling me to
    go Google it for myself doesn't cut it.

    I was preparing a lot of info for you not only Dr Malone is censored
    demonized and deleted,
    which you call that conspiracy.
    ALL Doctors who dare to talk about the negative aspects of the vaccins, climate or whatever the MSM want to push they all are banned from the MSM.
    That is what brainwashed people think of scientific open discussions. censorship!


    - but you are not clearly worth it, so I won't waste more time
    for you.

    That's fine but I will continue to challenge any other baseless claims
    you make.

    You tempt me to insult you the way you insult me but I realize you are a
    brainwashed victim of the propaganda you get shoved thru your throat
    every day.

    You already demonstrated you prefer to be insulted by your own twist of
    my posting and although I made it very clear that
    brainwashed people are vaccinated is not the same as vaccinated people
    are brainwashed.

    Same a women are human is not the same a human are women...
    You are too stuburn to admit you got it wrong.
    No matter how many sources I will show you, you will always deny it and
    go back to the manipulated and censored MSM.
    You will only accept fake news.

    A lot of projection in that paragraph!

    Fine with me.

    Edmund


    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 20:49:38 2022
    On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:08:10 -0000, Alan LeHun wrote:

    In article <srn0ce$iib$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    [...]
    Demanding people to let them inject an experimental drug with an
    emergency allowance that is not even out of the required testing period
    and long term effects are unknown.

    It is not a drug. That is disinformation aimed at swaying the opinions
    of the gullible and naive. The anti-vaccine lobby is so full of disinformation that one might be led to assume their arguments have
    little to no substance whatsoever.

    The long term effects of Covid are well known. The long term effects of
    both mRNA and viral vector vaccines (Covid vaccines are one of those two types) are also well known. Claiming that we "don't know the long term effects of Covid vaccines" is a bit like saying we don't know the safety
    of a Jet aircraft because someone installed type of microwave oven in
    the galley.

    Even the two major side effects that surfaced after the vaccine release (blood clotting & heart inflammation) are so incredibly rare that the
    full regular testing regime would probably not have detected them.




    Having said all that, I would also agree that many of the pro-vaxers
    have also made unsubstantiated or exaggerated claims and they do
    themselves a disservice by doing so. They don't need to.


    [...]



    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this prime peace
    of human intellect as your President, the most popular one ever!
    I am sure US citizens are drunk of happiness ever since.

    I am Scottish. I did not vote for Trump. I certainly did not vote for
    Boris. I do not consider my personal politics to be left wing.


    IIRC correctlt Endmund has previously promoted ivermectin (horse worming tablets) & hydroxochloroquine as well as citing Donald Trumps tame Quack
    Dr Stella Immanuel Who also believe witches & Demons who have sex with
    people in a dream world. I think this tells you all you need to know about Edmund's cognitive reasoning skills.

    Even Trump now admits the Vacciene works.





    --
    Most of our lives are about proving something, either to ourselves or to someone else.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 22:38:48 2022
    On 1/15/22 9:49 PM, alister wrote:
    On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:08:10 -0000, Alan LeHun wrote:

    In article <srn0ce$iib$1@dont-email.me>, nomail@hotmail.com says...

    [...]
    Demanding people to let them inject an experimental drug with an
    emergency allowance that is not even out of the required testing period
    and long term effects are unknown.

    It is not a drug. That is disinformation aimed at swaying the opinions
    of the gullible and naive. The anti-vaccine lobby is so full of
    disinformation that one might be led to assume their arguments have
    little to no substance whatsoever.

    The long term effects of Covid are well known. The long term effects of
    both mRNA and viral vector vaccines (Covid vaccines are one of those two
    types) are also well known. Claiming that we "don't know the long term
    effects of Covid vaccines" is a bit like saying we don't know the safety
    of a Jet aircraft because someone installed type of microwave oven in
    the galley.

    Even the two major side effects that surfaced after the vaccine release
    (blood clotting & heart inflammation) are so incredibly rare that the
    full regular testing regime would probably not have detected them.




    Having said all that, I would also agree that many of the pro-vaxers
    have also made unsubstantiated or exaggerated claims and they do
    themselves a disservice by doing so. They don't need to.


    [...]



    I am, sure you are one of the 80 million who voted for this prime peace
    of human intellect as your President, the most popular one ever!
    I am sure US citizens are drunk of happiness ever since.

    I am Scottish. I did not vote for Trump. I certainly did not vote for
    Boris. I do not consider my personal politics to be left wing.


    IIRC correctlt Endmund has previously promoted ivermectin (horse worming tablets) & hydroxochloroquine as well as citing Donald Trumps tame Quack
    Dr Stella Immanuel Who also believe witches & Demons who have sex with
    people in a dream world. I think this tells you all you need to know about Edmund's cognitive reasoning skills.

    I'm so happy for you, you buy all that propaganda, man you must be
    pissed of that Joe Rogan was cured in one after taking all those horse
    worming tablets as Google told you.

    Never mind that there are no Ivermectin Horse dewormer tablets.


    Even Trump now admits the Vacciene works.

    Show me who says they don't.





    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:05:37 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 2:38:51 PM UTC-7, Edmund wrote:

    Hey you stupid cunt.
    Got anything related to F1?
    Take your covid bullshit elsewhere.
    Get a fucking life asshole.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:12:44 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 1:49:42 PM UTC-7, alister wrote:

    Hey you stupid cunt.
    Got anything related to F1?
    Take your covid bullshit elsewhere.
    Get a fucking life asshole.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:13:34 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 8:02:37 AM UTC-7, martin...@gmail.com wrote:

    Hey you stupid cunt.
    Got anything related to F1?
    Take your covid bullshit elsewhere.
    Get a fucking life asshole.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:14:10 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 7:08:13 AM UTC-7, Alan LeHun wrote:

    Hey you stupid cunt.
    Got anything related to F1?
    Take your covid bullshit elsewhere.
    Get a fucking life asshole.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:15:22 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:20:30 AM UTC-7, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    Hey you stupid cunt.
    Got anything related to F1?
    Take your covid bullshit elsewhere.
    Get a fucking life asshole.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 11:53:54 2022
    On 15/01/2022 03:14, build wrote:

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies.

    Wrong. After (again) searching multiple reliable sources the number is 78%. You are repeating your
    governments quoted percentage of *eligible* Australians. Google vaccination by percentage of
    population instead of reporting local news.

    I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an
    'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know 'mandates'
    are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters
    and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.

    I agree that the anti-vaxxers should be respected as much as they respect pro-vaxxers (i.e.
    rational people). They should be respected enough to be made to pay for their own medical costs if
    they contract COVID after refusing the prophylactic treatment being offered by the government (at
    no cost to them). At least three governments around the world are planning to or have already taken
    this route.

    They should also respect others who chose to take all precautions against the virus by staying home
    and self-isolating, even if it means losing their jobs. I strongly believe in freedom of choice but
    all choices have consequences.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 15:06:13 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:53:58 PM UTC-7, ~misfit~ wrote:

    Hey you stupid cunt.
    Got anything related to F1?
    Take your covid bullshit elsewhere.
    Get a fucking life asshole.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 00:34:08 2022
    build wrote:

    Apparently the
    number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of
    Covid".


    You say some really dumb things but among them statements like this
    really stand out and demonstrate you cognitive short comings.

    What next "Apparently water is wet"?

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 16:47:50 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 5:34:10 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    Hey you stupid cunt.
    Got anything related to F1?
    Take your covid bullshit elsewhere.
    Get a fucking life asshole.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From keithr0@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 14:39:38 2022
    On 16/01/2022 8:53 am, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 15/01/2022 03:14, build wrote:

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies.

    Wrong. After (again) searching multiple reliable sources the number is
    78%. You are repeating your governments quoted percentage of *eligible* Australians. Google vaccination by percentage of population instead of reporting local news.

    Close, 92.9% of the population 12 years and older are fully vaccinated. Children 0-11 years make up about 12% of the population so the rate for
    the population as a whole on that basis is about 82.9%, but vaccination
    of children 5-11 has started so so there is an unknown number of single
    dosed children, the figure for the single dosed over 11 population is 94.5%.

    I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic'
    who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know
    'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage
    of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4%
    who don't want the vaccine should be respected.

    I agree that the anti-vaxxers should be respected as much as they
    respect pro-vaxxers (i.e. rational people). They should be respected
    enough to be made to pay for their own medical costs if they contract
    COVID after refusing the prophylactic treatment being offered by the government (at no cost to them). At least three governments around the
    world are planning to or have already taken this route.

    Agreed

    They should also respect others who chose to take all precautions
    against the virus by staying home and self-isolating, even if it means losing their jobs. I strongly believe in freedom of choice but all
    choices have consequences.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From keithr0@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 14:46:25 2022
    On 15/01/2022 1:14 pm, build wrote:
    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC+11, martin wrote:

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.

    Same for Covid !

    "rCyUp to halfrCO of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something totally different and were positive in routine testing"
    The Prime Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid hospitalisations rCo after it was revealed that hundreds of patients listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the virus at all.
    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb

    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of Covid. The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of Covid".

    "Death with COVID" doesn't mean that that is not what actually caused
    death. As with AIDS COVID can weaken the body such that another thing
    was the actual cause of death. So, although it wasn't the actual cause
    of death, the person would not have died without it.


    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old. Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for every column inch they can get.

    The 40 odd year old son of a friend of mine got COVID, he didn't die or
    end up in hospital, but he described it as the worst 10 days of his
    whole life.

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies. I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know 'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.

    build

    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From keithr0@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 15:11:27 2022
    On 16/01/2022 2:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 16/01/2022 8:53 am, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 15/01/2022 03:14, build wrote:

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies.

    Wrong. After (again) searching multiple reliable sources the number is
    78%. You are repeating your governments quoted percentage of
    *eligible* Australians. Google vaccination by percentage of population
    instead of reporting local news.

    Close, 92.9% of the population 12 years and older are fully vaccinated. Children 0-11 years make up about 12% of the population so the rate for
    the population as a whole on that basis is about 82.9%, but vaccination
    of children 5-11 has started so so there is an unknown number of single dosed children, the figure for the single dosed over 11 population is
    94.5%.

    Ooops that 92.9% should read 91.5%, I read the wrong column, so the
    overall rate should be 81.7%.

    I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic'
    who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know
    'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage
    of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4%
    who don't want the vaccine should be respected.

    I agree that the anti-vaxxers should be respected as much as they
    respect pro-vaxxers (i.e. rational people). They should be respected
    enough to be made to pay for their own medical costs if they contract
    COVID after refusing the prophylactic treatment being offered by the
    government (at no cost to them). At least three governments around the
    world are planning to or have already taken this route.

    Agreed

    They should also respect others who chose to take all precautions
    against the virus by staying home and self-isolating, even if it means
    losing their jobs. I strongly believe in freedom of choice but all
    choices have consequences.

    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 17 00:16:53 2022
    On 16/01/2022 6:11 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 16/01/2022 2:39 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 16/01/2022 8:53 am, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 15/01/2022 03:14, build wrote:

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies.

    Wrong. After (again) searching multiple reliable sources the number is 78%. You are repeating
    your governments quoted percentage of *eligible* Australians. Google vaccination by percentage
    of population instead of reporting local news.

    Close, 92.9% of the population 12 years and older are fully vaccinated. Children 0-11 years make
    up about 12% of the population so the rate for the population as a whole on that basis is about
    82.9%, but vaccination of children 5-11 has started so so there is an unknown number of single
    dosed children, the figure for the single dosed over 11 population is 94.5%.

    Ooops that 92.9% should read 91.5%, I read the wrong column, so the overall rate should be 81.7%.

    Yeah, most of the aggregating sites like that run by Johns Hopkins are a few days behind with the data.

    I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights'
    so like any sensible person I know 'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny
    percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want
    the vaccine should be respected.

    I agree that the anti-vaxxers should be respected as much as they respect pro-vaxxers (i.e.
    rational people). They should be respected enough to be made to pay for their own medical costs
    if they contract COVID after refusing the prophylactic treatment being offered by the government
    (at no cost to them). At least three governments around the world are planning to or have
    already taken this route.

    Agreed

    They should also respect others who chose to take all precautions against the virus by staying
    home and self-isolating, even if it means losing their jobs. I strongly believe in freedom of
    choice but all choices have consequences.




    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Edmund@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 12:57:01 2022
    On 1/15/22 11:05 PM, texas gate wrote:
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 2:38:51 PM UTC-7, Edmund wrote:

    Hey you stupid cunt.
    Got anything related to F1?
    Take your covid bullshit elsewhere.
    Get a fucking life asshole.

    How can I refuse such a friendly request, the season is over, not much
    to talk about at the moment, be patience.

    --
    rCLThe further a society drift from the truth,
    the more it will hate those who speak itrCY

    George Orwell
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 22:59:50 2022
    On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 16:28:38 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/15/22 3:37 PM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 14:33:42 +0100, Edmund <nomail@hotmail.com> wrote:

    On 1/15/22 11:27 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:54:26 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 3:58:19 AM UTC+11, martin... wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 11:36:46 +0100, Edmund <nom... wrote:

    So you can't name one.

    How about the inventor of the mRNA technic?

    What about him?

    It doesn't surprise me you don't even know.
    Google it yourself,
    Nope, you are making the claim, it's up to you to provide the
    evidence. Clearly you can't.

    Martin,
    Clearly he can. You are in denial or you've searched and did not like what you found. I searched and found him easily.

    Where did you get your information?

    Here are what I would regard as two reliable sources you might want to >>>> check out:

    I spent a lot of my time to provide you with some -other then MSM
    propaganda

    No you haven't provided any information at all, you have made claims
    without citing a single source to support your opinions. Telling me to
    go Google it for myself doesn't cut it.

    I was preparing a lot of info for you not only Dr Malone is censored >demonized and deleted,
    which you call that conspiracy.
    ALL Doctors who dare to talk about the negative aspects of the vaccins, >climate or whatever the MSM want to push they all are banned from the MSM. >That is what brainwashed people think of scientific open discussions. >censorship!

    Edmund, forget the insult trading and let me give you what is intended
    to be a friendly suggestion.

    Stand back and reflect on some of the ideas you have about Covid
    vaccination. On one side you have somebody like Mike Ryan who started
    life in quite humble circumstances here in rural Ireland; he rose
    through a highly successful career in medicine including working in
    various locations across the world on polio eradication, working in
    Uganda and the Congo on Ebola containment, eventually rising to the
    position of Executive Director of the World Health Organization's
    Health Emergencies Programme. On the other side you have Robert Malone
    who did make one important discovery 30 years ago that helped pave the
    way to mRNA vaccinations but has achieved nothing significant since
    then, blaming that on the pharmaceutical industry and various leading scientists whom he reckons have stiffed him.

    Why do you think Robert Malone's opinions are more reliable than Mike
    Ryan's?



    - but you are not clearly worth it, so I won't waste more time
    for you.

    That's fine but I will continue to challenge any other baseless claims
    you make.

    You tempt me to insult you the way you insult me but I realize you are a >>> brainwashed victim of the propaganda you get shoved thru your throat
    every day.

    You already demonstrated you prefer to be insulted by your own twist of
    my posting and although I made it very clear that
    brainwashed people are vaccinated is not the same as vaccinated people
    are brainwashed.

    Same a women are human is not the same a human are women...
    You are too stuburn to admit you got it wrong.
    No matter how many sources I will show you, you will always deny it and
    go back to the manipulated and censored MSM.
    You will only accept fake news.

    A lot of projection in that paragraph!

    Fine with me.

    Edmund
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 08:40:24 2022
    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:14:46 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC+11, martin wrote:

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted *because* they have a
    cold.

    Same for Covid !

    "aUp to halfA of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something totally different and were positive in routine testing"
    The Prime Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid hospitalisations u after it was revealed that hundreds of patients listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the virus at all.
    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb

    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of Covid. The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of Covid".

    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old. Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for every column inch they can get.

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of *all* Aussies. I'm not an anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know 'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.

    build


    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    Australia has suffered its deadliest day of the pandemic as a
    fast-moving Omicron outbreak continued to push up hospitalisation
    rates to record levels, even as daily infections eased slightly.

    Australia is dealing with its worst Covid-19 outbreak, fuelled by the
    Omicron variant of the coronavirus that has put more people in
    hospitals and intensive care than at any time during the pandemic.

    A total of 77 deaths was recorded, exceeding the previous national
    high of 57 last Thursday, official data showed.

    "Today, is a very difficult day for our state," New South Wales (NSW)
    Premier Dominic Perrottet said during a media briefing as the state
    reported 36 deaths, a new pandemic high.

    Only four of those who died in NSW had received their booster shot,
    prompting the state's health officials to urge people to avoid delays
    and get their third dose soon. Thirty-three were double-dosed.

    "There needs to be a sense of urgency in embracing the booster doses,"
    NSW Chief Health Officer Kerry Chant said. "For Omicron, we know that
    the protection is lower and we need that next boosting to get that
    higher level of protection."

    [...]
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 13:57:32 2022
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:14:46 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC+11, martin wrote:

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted because they have a
    cold.

    Same for Covid !

    "aUp to halfA of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something
    totally different and were positive in routine testing" The Prime
    Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid hospitalisations u after it was revealed that hundreds of patients
    listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the
    virus at all.

    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb

    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of
    Covid. The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the
    number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of
    Covid".

    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not
    know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to
    hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with
    the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but
    still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old. Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from
    alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for
    every column inch they can get.

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of all Aussies. I'm not an
    anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who
    supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know
    'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny
    percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of
    the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.

    build



    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?



    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 07:09:58 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 6:57:34 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    What's your point?

    fuck off you cock sucking idiot
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 07:13:31 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 6:57:34 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    Felicity

    was felicity picking on you?
    you sad pathetic fuck
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 15:22:28 2022
    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 19:14:46 -0800 (PST), build <buildy@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 8:49:34 PM UTC+11, martin wrote:

    I suspect few if any of them are were admitted because they have a
    cold.

    Same for Covid !

    "aUp to halfA of NSW Covid hospital patients went in for something
    totally different and were positive in routine testing" The Prime
    Minister will press premiers for a uniform definition of Covid
    hospitalisations u after it was revealed that hundreds of patients
    listed as hospitalised were not taken to hospital because of the
    virus at all.
    https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/up-to-half-of-nsw-covid-hospital-patients-went-in-for-something-totally-different-and-were-positive-in-routine-testing/news-story/603db6feed20422b3e8b57fd0e159fdb

    In other words they are in hospital "with Covid" not "because" of
    Covid. The same for ICU and the number of deaths. Apparently the
    number of deaths "with Covid" far exceed the number "because of
    Covid".

    In July 2020 I only knew 3 people who had had Covid. One did not
    know he had it, another spent a day in bed, the third went to
    hospital for observation for a few days. That sort of aligned with
    the media. Eighteen months on, I know dozens who've had it but
    still only one hospitalisation and one death of an eighty year old.
    Experience is not aligning with media narrative and I'm far from
    alone as the above article shows. The media is milking Covid for
    every column inch they can get.

    BTW, I am vaccinated, like 93% of all Aussies. I'm not an
    anti-vaxxer but I am a realist, an 'Optimistic Skeptic' who
    supports 'Human Rights' so like any sensible person I know
    'mandates' are a Human Rights abuse. The very, very, tiny
    percentage of nutters have the right to be nutters and the rest of
    the 3% or 4% who don't want the vaccine should be respected.

    build



    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 16:28:56 2022
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:


    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for
    attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other people
    with his diseases is of course the very opposite of "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order to
    draw any inferences.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 09:03:02 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:28:58 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    Felicity

    did felicity hurt your feelers?
    you fucking tit
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 09:11:41 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:28:58 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    build

    when did you remove build from your kill file? lol
    you wishy washy spineless pussy
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 09:26:03 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 10:11:42 AM UTC-7, texas gate wrote:

    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 9:28:58 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    build

    when did you remove build from your kill file? lol
    you wishy washy spineless pussy

    your kill file has more holes in it
    than the british front lines in ww2
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 17:33:56 2022
    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:28:56 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:


    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for >attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other people
    with his diseases is of course the very opposite of "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous

    Try telling that to the families of the people who died and who
    probably didn't even get to be with their loved ones in their final
    hours :(

    and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order to
    draw any inferences.

    Perhaps you missed the bit you snipped about it being the worst day
    ever since Covid began - Edmund and build seemed to think we were over
    the worst of it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 20:25:16 2022
    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 17:33:56 +0000, Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:28:56 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:


    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-
    global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge Updated /
    Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for >>attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other people >>with his diseases is of course the very opposite of "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous

    Try telling that to the families of the people who died and who probably didn't even get to be with their loved ones in their final hours :(

    and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order to
    draw any inferences.

    Perhaps you missed the bit you snipped about it being the worst day ever since Covid began - Edmund and build seemed to think we were over the
    worst of it.

    Aus. has had some pretty aggressive covid restrictions, which is why the figures are so low
    take a look at countries that were not so strict & see wow apauling thier figures are so low.
    UK >150000 deaths, Jan 15th - >280 deaths.

    this may be why some Australians can see the need for vaccination






    --
    Never trust anyone who says money is no object.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 19 09:52:24 2022
    On 19/01/2022 5:28 am, Bigbird wrote:
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:


    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other people
    with his diseases is of course the very opposite of "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order to
    draw any inferences.


    Pretty disastrous for those who would otherwise be alive but for Covid-version-whichever. And their families, maybe with exceptions.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 20:53:59 2022
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:28:56 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:



    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other
    people with his diseases is of course the very opposite of
    "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous

    Try telling that to the families of the people who died and who
    probably didn't even get to be with their loved ones in their final
    hours :(


    People die.

    What are you comparing these numbers to?

    Should I say "tell that to the thousands of families who lose loved
    ones to flue every season"?

    Numbers are just statistics; meaningless without context.

    I've never like people getting over emotional about statistics; they
    remind me of people who will raise $5m to save a single child while
    letting millions of children die for the sake of a few dollars medicine
    each.

    and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order
    to draw any inferences.

    Perhaps you missed the bit you snipped about it being the worst day
    ever since Covid began

    Nope and I'm not sure that is what it said. Perhaps you missed the bit
    where I suggested that context was important.

    How does the "worst day ever since covid began" compare with the worst
    day during a flu epidemic?

    Articles that throw numbers out have become meaningless to an awful lot
    of people. There are a lot of variables involved.

    - Edmund and build seemed to think we were over
    the worst of it.

    I wouldn't pay too much attention to what either of them "seem to
    think"; in the same vain I don't think responding in kind is
    particularly enlightening.


    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 20:58:12 2022
    geoff wrote:

    On 19/01/2022 5:28 am, Bigbird wrote:
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:



    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other
    people with his diseases is of course the very opposite of
    "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order
    to draw any inferences.


    Pretty disastrous for those who would otherwise be alive but for Covid-version-whichever. And their families, maybe with exceptions.


    Isn't that the same for anyone who dies yet millions always have, for
    one reason or another.

    Emotive phrases with zero context are worthless.

    People continue to die from starvation, poverty, minor untreated
    ailments, flu, suicide... is it not just as disastrous for them?

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 19 11:23:07 2022
    On 19/01/2022 5:28 am, Bigbird wrote:
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:


    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other people
    with his diseases is of course the very opposite of "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order to
    draw any inferences.

    For years I've been saying that humans via modern medicine has been undoing millennia of evolution
    by keeping the less 'well adapted' alive and halting further evolution of the human race. However
    with COVID we're finally seeing a disease that now seems to be predominantly killing the stupid
    (unvaccinated).

    For once society and evolution are on the same page. It's almost like voluntary eugenics.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 15:22:24 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 3:23:11 PM UTC-7, ~misfit~ wrote:

    For years I've been saying

    How is that working out for you?
    Pirating sky f1.
    Living on government handouts.
    Crying the blues on the internet.
    A real fucking societal leech.
    Fuck off stupid.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 15:53:07 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 3:23:11 PM UTC-7, ~misfit~ wrote:

    For years I've been saying that humans via modern medicine has been undoing millennia of evolution
    by keeping the less 'well adapted' alive and halting further evolution of the human race. However
    with COVID we're finally seeing a disease that now seems to be predominantly killing the stupid
    (unvaccinated).

    For once society and evolution are on the same page. It's almost like voluntary eugenics.

    Adjust your meds.
    Tell your male nurse that
    you are fucking delusional.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 18:21:28 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 1:58:14 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    People continue to die from starvation, poverty, minor untreated
    ailments, flu, suicide...

    how long do dumb professional dog walkers live?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 19 16:51:55 2022
    On 19/01/2022 9:58 am, Bigbird wrote:
    geoff wrote:

    On 19/01/2022 5:28 am, Bigbird wrote:
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:



    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for
    attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other
    people with his diseases is of course the very opposite of
    "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order
    to draw any inferences.


    Pretty disastrous for those who would otherwise be alive but for
    Covid-version-whichever. And their families, maybe with exceptions.


    Isn't that the same for anyone who dies yet millions always have, for
    one reason or another.

    Emotive phrases with zero context are worthless.

    People continue to die from starvation, poverty, minor untreated
    ailments, flu, suicide... is it not just as disastrous for them?


    Certainly, but these people would be alive but for Covid, and there
    exists a vaccine to help reduce infection and/or the severity of infections.

    Let me know when you find a vaccine for starvation, poverty, suicide,
    and the other applicable ailments.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 23:56:44 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 8:52:02 PM UTC-7, geoff wrote:

    Let me know

    lol
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 19 10:06:16 2022
    geoff wrote:

    On 19/01/2022 9:58 am, Bigbird wrote:
    geoff wrote:

    On 19/01/2022 5:28 am, Bigbird wrote:
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:




    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund
    and build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just
    looking for attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to
    infect other people with his diseases is of course the very
    opposite of "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem
    disastrous and really need some comparison to other
    communicable diseases in order to draw any inferences.


    Pretty disastrous for those who would otherwise be alive but for Covid-version-whichever. And their families, maybe with
    exceptions.


    Isn't that the same for anyone who dies yet millions always have,
    for one reason or another.

    Emotive phrases with zero context are worthless.

    People continue to die from starvation, poverty, minor untreated
    ailments, flu, suicide... is it not just as disastrous for them?


    Certainly, but these people would be alive but for Covid, and there
    exists a vaccine to help reduce infection and/or the severity of
    infections.


    Which is just deflection from what I was saying about quantifying the
    problem.

    Let me know when you find a vaccine for starvation,

    Food and/or ways to procure or grow food.

    poverty,

    Money or ways to earn money or charity.

    suicide,

    Too many ways to mention.

    and the other applicable ailments.


    What point are you trying to make other than proving your contrariness?



    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 19 10:07:38 2022
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 19/01/2022 5:28 am, Bigbird wrote:
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:



    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other
    people with his diseases is of course the very opposite of
    "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order
    to draw any inferences.

    For years I've been saying that humans via modern medicine has been
    undoing millennia of evolution by keeping the less 'well adapted'
    alive and halting further evolution of the human race. However with
    COVID we're finally seeing a disease that now seems to be
    predominantly killing the stupid (unvaccinated).

    For once society and evolution are on the same page. It's almost like voluntary eugenics.

    That's a can of worms I am not willing to open here.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 20 11:13:07 2022
    On 19/01/2022 11:07 pm, Bigbird wrote:
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 19/01/2022 5:28 am, Bigbird wrote:
    Martin Harran wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 13:57:32 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Martin Harran wrote:



    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2022/0118/1274275-coronavirus-global/

    Hospitalisations increase in Australia's Omicron surge
    Updated / Tuesday, 18 Jan 2022 08:01

    [snip]

    What's your point?

    That Omicron was and still is doing far more harm than Edmund and
    build were making out.

    Well Edmund is a conspiracy theory nut but build is just looking for
    attention. Claiming an inalienable "human right" to infect other
    people with his diseases is of course the very opposite of
    "sensible".

    That said, on the face of it, the numbers do not seem disastrous and
    really need some comparison to other communicable diseases in order
    to draw any inferences.

    For years I've been saying that humans via modern medicine has been
    undoing millennia of evolution by keeping the less 'well adapted'
    alive and halting further evolution of the human race. However with
    COVID we're finally seeing a disease that now seems to be
    predominantly killing the stupid (unvaccinated).

    For once society and evolution are on the same page. It's almost like
    voluntary eugenics.

    That's a can of worms I am not willing to open here.

    Fair enough.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 20 07:05:48 2022
    On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 3:07:40 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    That's a can of worms I am not willing to open here.

    oh goody for you
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 20 07:06:12 2022
    On Wednesday, January 19, 2022 at 3:13:10 PM UTC-7, ~misfit~ wrote:

    Fair enough.

    fag
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)