• Toto gets it...

    From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 5 19:43:32 2022
    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps pressured
    into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'

    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 07:16:59 2022
    Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps pressured
    into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>


    Eh? What is it that you think only you in your conceited little world
    "get"?

    I think perhaps you have twisted things in your silly little head.

    If you are so in sync with Toto then perhaps you "get" that he blames
    the RD for a bad decision and that he is not up to the job.

    rCLStefano [Domenicali, F1 CEO] is a real racing man and would not be interested in intervening in the races for the entertainment factor.

    rCLI canrCOt judge the pressure the race director is under at the time, but
    the rules are the rules.rCY
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 07:43:34 2022
    On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 8:43:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    go fuck your pathetic self
    you fucking piece of shit
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 09:10:23 2022
    On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 at 8:43:38 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad

    please take care of yourself during this difficult
    do not do anything stupid
    you stupid cunt
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 10:12:38 2022
    On 2022-01-05 11:16 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps pressured
    into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>


    Eh? What is it that you think only you in your conceited little world
    "get"?

    I think perhaps you have twisted things in your silly little head.

    If you are so in sync with Toto then perhaps you "get" that he blames
    the RD for a bad decision and that he is not up to the job.

    rCLStefano [Domenicali, F1 CEO] is a real racing man and would not be interested in intervening in the races for the entertainment factor.

    rCLI canrCOt judge the pressure the race director is under at the time, but the rules are the rules.rCY

    You get that those comments confirm what I was saying, right?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 10:34:47 2022
    On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 11:12:41 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    You get that those comments confirm what I was saying, right?

    you are a confirmed fucking moron
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 22:06:52 2022
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps pressured
    into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'

    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race fizzle
    out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    and Wolf was doing his own pressurizing earlier on (also Broadcast)
    as other said previously that needs to stop.




    --
    Oh this age! How tasteless and ill-bred it is.
    -- Gaius Valerius Catullus
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 14:17:54 2022
    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps pressured
    into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'

    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race fizzle
    out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan LeHun@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 7 01:24:37 2022
    In article <sr7pqi$ng$2@gioia.aioe.org>, nope@nope.com says...
    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.


    What? He was?

    I think you're reading something that isn't there.

    The pressure that Toto was referring to inesho, came from the team
    directors against the background (not mentioned) of a Team Directors
    meeting previously where it was agreed that where possible, races should finish under race conditions.

    In the article quoted, Toto says "The whole decision-making system must
    be improved". As Masi was at the very top of this decision-making system
    it is difficult to infer how he could be referring to pressure 'from
    above' Masi.

    In other articles, Toto has suggested that Teams should no longer be
    allowed to converse with the RD directly during races so any clarity as
    to where Toto thinks the pressure is coming from can be inferred from
    that.

    There is absolutely nothing in the article that suggests Toto was
    referring to pressure 'from above'.


    --
    Alan LeHun
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 17:30:04 2022
    On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 3:17:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    Did you read what was in the article?

    none of your fucking business
    you weird ass fucking cock sucker
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 6 17:33:59 2022
    On Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 6:24:40 PM UTC-7, Alan LeHun wrote:

    I think you're reading something that isn't there.

    yup, he's just trolling
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 7 07:22:06 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-05 11:16 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'



    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>


    Eh? What is it that you think only you in your conceited little
    world "get"?

    I think perhaps you have twisted things in your silly little head.

    If you are so in sync with Toto then perhaps you "get" that he
    blames the RD for a bad decision and that he is not up to the job.

    rCLStefano [Domenicali, F1 CEO] is a real racing man and would not be interested in intervening in the races for the entertainment factor.

    rCLI canrCOt judge the pressure the race director is under at the time,
    but the rules are the rules.rCY

    You get that those comments confirm what I was saying, right?

    I don't know what you are trying to say... perhaps "water is wet".

    As always you are mealy mouthed and vague.

    What I do know is that I quoted Toto; who did you quote?

    --
    Bozo bin
    George R
    Irving S
    Build
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 7 07:24:19 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race
    fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio
    message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed about
    the culpability of the RD, right?

    --
    Bozo bin
    George R
    Irving S
    Build
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 10:45:24 2022
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race
    fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio message
    was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed about
    the culpability of the RD, right?

    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes (or in
    this case days) after he has lost the argument




    --
    If I have not seen so far it is because I stood in giant's footsteps.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 9 22:56:04 2022
    On 2022-01-09 2:45 a.m., alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race
    fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio message
    was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed about
    the culpability of the RD, right?

    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes (or in
    this case days) after he has lost the argument





    I don't see how pointing out the obvious that you all seem to miss is
    saying "another thing".

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 13:35:56 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-09 2:45 a.m., alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'



    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the
    race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio
    message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed
    about the culpability of the RD, right?

    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes
    (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument





    I don't see how pointing out the obvious that you all seem to miss is
    saying "another thing".


    Yet that is not what you have done, is it.

    If you thought you had you wouldn't continue to be so mealy mouthed.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Build
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Jan 10 14:11:15 2022
    On 2022-01-10 5:35 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-09 2:45 a.m., alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'



    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the
    race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio
    message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed
    about the culpability of the RD, right?

    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes
    (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument





    I don't see how pointing out the obvious that you all seem to miss is
    saying "another thing".


    Yet that is not what you have done, is it.

    If you thought you had you wouldn't continue to be so mealy mouthed.


    How is what I said, "mealy mouthed"?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 11 10:44:47 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-10 5:35 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-09 2:45 a.m., alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was
    perhaps pressured into stopping the race fizzling out
    via race car.'




    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-dr


    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let
    the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners
    radio message was brodcast so there is no doubt about
    that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you
    claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?

    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes
    (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument





    I don't see how pointing out the obvious that you all seem to
    miss is saying "another thing".


    Yet that is not what you have done, is it.

    If you thought you had you wouldn't continue to be so mealy mouthed.


    How is what I said, "mealy mouthed"?

    ...because you have said nothing lucid or rational and you refuse to
    answer any questions which seek to clarify your comments.

    You have posted one falsely attributed quote and an unsupported
    nonsensical claim.

    Indeed you have referenced an article that contradicts your previous
    position claiming it does the opposite.

    If you disagree you are mealy mouthed then state clearly what you are attempting to convey by your confused and inaccurate OP.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Build
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 20:48:28 2022
    Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-10 5:35 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-09 2:45 a.m., alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was
    perhaps pressured into stopping the race fizzling out
    via race car.'




    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-
    dr ama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let
    the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners
    radio message was brodcast so there is no doubt about
    that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you
    claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?

    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30
    minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument





    I don't see how pointing out the obvious that you all seem to
    miss is saying "another thing".


    Yet that is not what you have done, is it.

    If you thought you had you wouldn't continue to be so mealy
    mouthed.


    How is what I said, "mealy mouthed"?

    ...because you have said nothing lucid or rational and you refuse to
    answer any questions which seek to clarify your comments.

    You have posted one falsely attributed quote and an unsupported
    nonsensical claim.

    Indeed you have referenced an article that contradicts your previous
    position claiming it does the opposite.

    If you disagree you are mealy mouthed then state clearly what you are attempting to convey by your confused and inaccurate OP.

    <crickets>

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Build
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 12 14:41:36 2022
    On Wednesday, January 12, 2022 at 1:48:30 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    <crickets>

    fuck off stupid
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From build@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 16:29:30 2022
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race
    fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio message >> > was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes (or in
    this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the HamFans.
    If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only non-HamFan here.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 17:20:00 2022
    On Friday, January 14, 2022 at 5:29:32 PM UTC-7, build wrote:

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the HamFans.
    If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only non-HamFan here.

    holy fucking troll
    alan is waiting for your sweet asshole
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 14 20:14:47 2022
    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race
    fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio message >>>>> was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed about
    the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes (or in
    this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the HamFans.
    If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by being in the
    best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much every championship he's
    won.

    It's going to be very interesting to see how next season unfolds, when
    Russell is in the second Mercedes.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan LeHun@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 14:07:50 2022
    In article <ec51e0f7-fcf5-46c3-83e4-1ed8631c5026n@googlegroups.com>, buildy@gmail.com says...
    No he has not lost the argument.


    Then perhaps you would care to show us all exactly where Toto supports
    Bakers assertions by claiming 'pressure from above' in the article
    linked to.

    Because that /is/ the argument here.



    --
    Alan LeHun
    Not a Hamfan.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 01:18:58 2022
    build wrote:

    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.'


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilt
    on-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-drama>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the
    race >> > fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio
    message >> > was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed
    about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes
    (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the
    HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only non-HamFan
    here.

    You're wrong.

    He had plenty of opportunity to respond to arguments but chose to run
    away instead, He has then raised his head again with the nonsensical
    OP, making invalid claims and has again run away without responding to
    requests that he make his case instead of being mealy mouthed.



    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 16 01:21:51 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race
    car.'



    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-dram


    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the
    race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners
    radio message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you
    claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes
    (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the
    HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only
    non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by being in
    the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much every
    championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution of the
    team and car while also failing to recognise that he has often
    performed extremely well when not in the best car (often by quite a
    margin).

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 17:56:32 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 6:19:00 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    He had plenty of opportunity to respond to arguments but chose to run
    away instead, He has then raised his head again with the nonsensical
    OP, making invalid claims and has again run away without responding to requests that he make his case instead of being mealy mouthed.

    lol. get fucking help
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 17:59:20 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 6:21:53 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution of the
    team and car while also failing to recognise that he has often
    performed extremely well when not in the best car (often by quite a
    margin).
    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    lol
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Jan 15 19:18:57 2022
    On Saturday, January 15, 2022 at 6:19:00 PM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:

    Felicity

    lol
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 14:48:51 2022
    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race
    car.'



    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-dram


    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the
    race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners
    radio message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you
    claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes
    (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the
    HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only
    non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by being in
    the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much every
    championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution of the
    team and car while also failing to recognise that he has often
    performed extremely well when not in the best car (often by quite a
    margin).


    Give an example of this.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 18 15:11:12 2022
    On Tuesday, January 18, 2022 at 3:48:54 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    Give an example of this.

    Ever heard of the word 'please'?
    You fucking stupid ignorant
    piece of shit
    trolling
    cock sucking
    cunt
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 19 10:10:09 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was
    perhaps pressured into stopping the race fizzling out
    via race car.'




    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-
    dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let
    the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners
    radio message was brodcast so there is no doubt about
    that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you
    claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30
    minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only
    non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by being
    in the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much every championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution of
    the team and car while also failing to recognise that he has often performed extremely well when not in the best car (often by quite a margin).


    Give an example of this.

    If you are claiming that it is not so or that you are clueless as to
    any such instances then I am happy to make a fool of you again but
    commit first.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 19 09:24:36 2022
    On 2022-01-19 2:10 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was
    perhaps pressured into stopping the race fizzling out
    via race car.'




    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-
    dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let
    the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners
    radio message was brodcast so there is no doubt about
    that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you
    claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30
    minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the
    HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only
    non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by being
    in the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much every
    championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution of
    the team and car while also failing to recognise that he has often
    performed extremely well when not in the best car (often by quite a
    margin).


    Give an example of this.

    If you are claiming that it is not so or that you are clueless as to
    any such instances then I am happy to make a fool of you again but
    commit first.


    If you were happy to provide a cite, you'd have done so without the song
    and dance.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 19 22:48:22 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-19 2:10 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister
    wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps pressured into stopping the race fizzling
    out via race car.'





    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dh
    abi- dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not
    let the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing
    (Horners radio message was brodcast so there is no
    doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything
    you claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30
    minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost the
    argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by
    the HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the
    only non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by
    being in the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much
    every championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution
    of the team and car while also failing to recognise that he has
    often performed extremely well when not in the best car (often
    by quite a margin).


    Give an example of this.

    If you are claiming that it is not so or that you are clueless as to
    any such instances then I am happy to make a fool of you again but
    commit first.


    If you were happy to provide a cite, you'd have done so without the
    song and dance.

    No, song and dance.

    Do I need to? Are you clueless? Yes or no.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 20 02:14:25 2022
    On 2022-01-19 2:48 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-19 2:10 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister
    wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was
    perhaps pressured into stopping the race fizzling
    out via race car.'





    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dh
    abi- dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not
    let the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing
    (Horners radio message was brodcast so there is no
    doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything
    you claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30
    minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost the
    argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by
    the HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the
    only non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by
    being in the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much
    every championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution
    of the team and car while also failing to recognise that he has
    often performed extremely well when not in the best car (often
    by quite a margin).


    Give an example of this.

    If you are claiming that it is not so or that you are clueless as to
    any such instances then I am happy to make a fool of you again but
    commit first.


    If you were happy to provide a cite, you'd have done so without the
    song and dance.

    No, song and dance.

    Do I need to? Are you clueless? Yes or no.


    I asked you for an example.

    This is the second time you've replied without giving one.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Jan 20 11:02:26 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-19 2:48 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-19 2:10 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister
    wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird
    wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes
    Masi was perhaps pressured into stopping the
    race fizzling out via race car.'






    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Ab
    u-Dh abi- dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to
    "not let the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing
    (Horners radio message was brodcast so there is
    no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting
    everything you claimed about the culpability of the
    RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing"
    30 minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost
    the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned
    out by the HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems
    he is the only non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven
    by being in the best car (often by a good margin) in
    pretty much every championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the
    contribution of the team and car while also failing to
    recognise that he has often performed extremely well when
    not in the best car (often by quite a margin).


    Give an example of this.

    If you are claiming that it is not so or that you are clueless
    as to any such instances then I am happy to make a fool of you
    again but commit first.


    If you were happy to provide a cite, you'd have done so without
    the song and dance.

    No, song and dance.

    Do I need to? Are you clueless? Yes or no.


    I asked you for an example.

    This is the second time you've replied without giving one.

    I have asked you for your reason for needing one.

    This is the umpteenth time you have refused such requests.

    Admit being clueless and I'll clue you in as I have done in similar
    situations before.

    If you are not clueless why would you need an example?

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 21 00:09:34 2022
    On 2022-01-20 3:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-19 2:48 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-19 2:10 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister
    wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird
    wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes
    Masi was perhaps pressured into stopping the
    race fizzling out via race car.'






    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Ab
    u-Dh abi- dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to
    "not let the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing
    (Horners radio message was brodcast so there is
    no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting
    everything you claimed about the culpability of the
    RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing"
    30 minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost
    the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned
    out by the HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems
    he is the only non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven
    by being in the best car (often by a good margin) in
    pretty much every championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the
    contribution of the team and car while also failing to
    recognise that he has often performed extremely well when
    not in the best car (often by quite a margin).


    Give an example of this.

    If you are claiming that it is not so or that you are clueless
    as to any such instances then I am happy to make a fool of you
    again but commit first.


    If you were happy to provide a cite, you'd have done so without
    the song and dance.

    No, song and dance.

    Do I need to? Are you clueless? Yes or no.


    I asked you for an example.

    This is the second time you've replied without giving one.

    I have asked you for your reason for needing one.

    Because I think you're full of shit.

    So produce your example.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Jan 21 09:44:52 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-20 3:02 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-19 2:48 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-19 2:10 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11,
    alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird
    wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan
    wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes
    Masi was perhaps pressured into stopping
    the race fizzling out via race car.'







    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-lates
    t-Ab u-Dh abi- dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured
    to "not let the race fizzle out under a
    safety car" Red bull were doing a lot of
    that pressurizing (Horners radio message
    was brodcast so there is no doubt about
    that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from
    above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting
    everything you claimed about the culpability of
    the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another
    thing" 30 minutes (or in this case days) after he
    has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned
    out by the HamFans. If you have not noticed, it
    seems he is the only non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely
    driven by being in the best car (often by a good
    margin) in pretty much every championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the
    contribution of the team and car while also failing to recognise that he has often performed extremely well
    when not in the best car (often by quite a margin).


    Give an example of this.

    If you are claiming that it is not so or that you are
    clueless as to any such instances then I am happy to make a
    fool of you again but commit first.


    If you were happy to provide a cite, you'd have done so
    without the song and dance.

    No, song and dance.

    Do I need to? Are you clueless? Yes or no.


    I asked you for an example.

    This is the second time you've replied without giving one.

    I have asked you for your reason for needing one.

    Because I think you're full of shit.

    Well you could have put in a more gracious manner but okay, you admit
    you know so little about the Hamilton/McLaren era and/or don't have the
    wit to look for yourself.


    So produce your example.

    2009 is a pretty good example of being in far from the best car yet
    still gaining to wins and out performing his teammate by quite a margin.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 23 12:15:02 2022
    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:48:51 -0800, Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps
    pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.' >>>>>>>>>


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton- >>>>>>>> Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-dram a> >>>>>>>>
    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race >>>>>>>> fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio
    message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed
    about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes (or >>>>> in this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the
    HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only non-HamFan
    here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by being in
    the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much every
    championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution of the
    team and car while also failing to recognise that he has often
    performed extremely well when not in the best car (often by quite a
    margin).


    Give an example of this.

    Lewis has won at least 1 GP every season, Including those with McClaren
    after their downturn & Merc in 2013 before their climb to dominance. that
    must count for something.



    --
    Political history is far too criminal a subject to be a fit thing to
    teach children.
    -- W. H. Auden
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 23 11:16:31 2022
    On 2022-01-23 4:15 a.m., alister wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:48:51 -0800, Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi was perhaps >>>>>>>>>> pressured into stopping the race fizzling out via race car.' >>>>>>>>>>


    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton- >>>>>>>>> Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dhabi-dram a> >>>>>>>>>
    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not let the race >>>>>>>>> fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing (Horners radio >>>>>>>>> message was brodcast so there is no doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything you claimed >>>>>>> about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30 minutes (or >>>>>> in this case days) after he has lost the argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by the
    HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the only non-HamFan >>>>> here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by being in
    the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much every
    championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution of the
    team and car while also failing to recognise that he has often
    performed extremely well when not in the best car (often by quite a
    margin).


    Give an example of this.

    Lewis has won at least 1 GP every season, Including those with McClaren after their downturn & Merc in 2013 before their climb to dominance. that must count for something.

    Again, that would only matter if I'm claiming that Hamilton's success is
    ONLY due to the cars he's had...

    ...and I'm not.

    But while he was better than this teammate, Heikki Kovalainen, in 2009
    and 2008, it wasn't like he was winning in the McLaren and Kovalainen
    wasn't in the points. Saying Hamilton is better than Kovaleinen is NOT
    saying that Hamilton is the greatest that ever was.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 23 20:54:29 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-23 4:15 a.m., alister wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:48:51 -0800, Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister
    wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi
    was perhaps pressured into stopping the race
    fizzling out via race car.'




    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dh abi-dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not
    let the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing
    (Horners radio message was brodcast so there is no
    doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything
    you claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30
    minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost the
    argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by
    the HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the
    only non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by
    being in the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much
    every championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution
    of the team and car while also failing to recognise that he has
    often performed extremely well when not in the best car (often
    by quite a margin).


    Give an example of this.

    Lewis has won at least 1 GP every season, Including those with
    McClaren after their downturn & Merc in 2013 before their climb to dominance. that must count for something.

    Again, that would only matter if I'm claiming that Hamilton's success
    is ONLY due to the cars he's had...

    ...and I'm not.

    But while he was better than this teammate, Heikki Kovalainen, in
    2009 and 2008, it wasn't like he was winning in the McLaren and
    Kovalainen wasn't in the points. Saying Hamilton is better than
    Kovaleinen is NOT saying that Hamilton is the greatest that ever was.

    You do like moving those goalposts, don't you.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 23 13:42:54 2022
    On 2022-01-23 12:54 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-23 4:15 a.m., alister wrote:
    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 14:48:51 -0800, Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-15 5:21 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-14 4:29 p.m., build wrote:
    On Sunday, January 9, 2022 at 9:45:26 PM UTC+11, alister
    wrote:
    On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 07:24:19 -0000 (UTC), Bigbird wrote:

    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-06 2:06 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 19:43:32 -0800, Alan wrote:

    ...it's just too bad so many of you don't.

    'Wolff refutes this, although he believes Masi
    was perhaps pressured into stopping the race
    fizzling out via race car.'




    <https://www.express.co.uk/sport/f1-autosport/1545056/Lewis-Hamilton-
    Max-Verstappen-Toto-Wolff-Michael-Masi-latest-Abu-Dh
    abi-dram a>

    I would agree that Masi was being pressured to "not
    let the race fizzle out under a safety car"
    Red bull were doing a lot of that pressurizing
    (Horners radio message was brodcast so there is no
    doubt about that)

    Did you read what was in the article?

    Toto was clearly referring to pressure from above.

    Toto?

    Quote what Toto said that makes that "clear".

    You understand that Toto was contradicting everything
    you claimed about the culpability of the RD, right?
    Baker is simply an old man saying "And another thing" 30
    minutes (or in this case days) after he has lost the
    argument

    No he has not lost the argument. He has been drowned out by
    the HamFans. If you have not noticed, it seems he is the
    only non-HamFan here.


    I'm not particularly a Hamilton fan...

    ...but I don't hate him or even dislike him.

    I just recognize that his success has been hugely driven by
    being in the best car (often by a good margin) in pretty much
    every championship he's won.


    You say that as if most people don't recognise the contribution
    of the team and car while also failing to recognise that he has
    often performed extremely well when not in the best car (often
    by quite a margin).


    Give an example of this.

    Lewis has won at least 1 GP every season, Including those with
    McClaren after their downturn & Merc in 2013 before their climb to
    dominance. that must count for something.

    Again, that would only matter if I'm claiming that Hamilton's success
    is ONLY due to the cars he's had...

    ...and I'm not.

    But while he was better than this teammate, Heikki Kovalainen, in
    2009 and 2008, it wasn't like he was winning in the McLaren and
    Kovalainen wasn't in the points. Saying Hamilton is better than
    Kovaleinen is NOT saying that Hamilton is the greatest that ever was.

    You do like moving those goalposts, don't you.


    How was the goalpost moved?

    The discussion began with me saying that Hamilton's success has been
    mostly driven by him being in the best car.

    And that's still true.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Jan 23 15:25:45 2022
    On Sunday, January 23, 2022 at 2:42:56 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    How was the goalpost moved?

    via your trolling
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From alister@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 25 23:21:27 2022
    On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:42:54 -0800, Alan wrote:


    The discussion began with me saying that Hamilton's success has been
    mostly driven by him being in the best car.

    And that's still true.

    Q) how exactly do you get to be in the best car?

    A) By making the team that produces the best car think you are the best
    driver available to them.





    --
    I'm QUIETLY reading the latest issue of "BOWLING WORLD" while my wife
    and two children stand QUIETLY BY ...
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 25 15:57:37 2022
    On 2022-01-25 3:21 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:42:54 -0800, Alan wrote:


    The discussion began with me saying that Hamilton's success has been
    mostly driven by him being in the best car.

    And that's still true.

    Q) how exactly do you get to be in the best car?

    A) By making the team that produces the best car think you are the best driver available to them.

    And that's usually true; almost always.

    But:

    1. Thinking he's the best driver available isn't the same as BEING the
    best driver available as a matter of fact, is it?

    2. The slavish worship of Hamilton has him the greatest of all time...

    ...which is just unsupportable by pointing to a record that is almost exclusively in the very best car out there.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 25 17:54:03 2022
    On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 4:57:41 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    And that's usually true; almost always.

    But:

    1. Thinking he's the best driver available isn't the same as BEING the
    best driver available as a matter of fact, is it?

    2. The slavish worship of Hamilton has him the greatest of all time...

    ...which is just unsupportable by pointing to a record that is almost exclusively in the very best car out there.

    you fucking piece of shit
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 25 18:01:28 2022
    On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 4:57:41 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    And that's usually true; almost always.

    lol

    1. Thinking he's the best driver available isn't the same as BEING the
    best driver available as a matter of fact, is it?

    lol. what a fucking buffoon
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Jan 25 18:04:06 2022
    On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 4:57:41 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

    as a matter of fact

    lol. kill yourself
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 26 16:11:19 2022
    On 26/01/2022 12:57 pm, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-01-25 3:21 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:42:54 -0800, Alan wrote:


    The discussion began with me saying that Hamilton's success has been
    mostly driven by him being in the best car.

    And that's still true.

    Q) how exactly do you get to be in the best car?

    A) By making the team that produces the best car think you are the best
    driver available to them.

    And that's usually true; almost always.

    But:

    1. Thinking he's the best driver available isn't the same as BEING the
    best driver available as a matter of fact, is it?

    2. The slavish worship of Hamilton has him the greatest of all time...

    ...which is just unsupportable by pointing to a record that is almost exclusively in the very best car out there.


    Or by being chosen to be in the best car out there. I wonder why.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Jan 26 10:47:22 2022
    Alan wrote:

    On 2022-01-25 3:21 p.m., alister wrote:
    On Sun, 23 Jan 2022 13:42:54 -0800, Alan wrote:


    The discussion began with me saying that Hamilton's success has
    been mostly driven by him being in the best car.

    And that's still true.

    Q) how exactly do you get to be in the best car?

    A) By making the team that produces the best car think you are the
    best driver available to them.

    And that's usually true; almost always.

    But:

    1. Thinking he's the best driver available isn't the same as BEING
    the best driver available as a matter of fact, is it?

    2. The slavish worship of Hamilton has him the greatest of all time...

    ...which is just unsupportable by pointing to a record that is almost exclusively in the very best car out there.

    Still moving those goal posts I see.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)