1. Forum
  2. SportNet
  3. SN AUTORACING F1

  • So the bar is set

    From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Nov 20 14:34:18 2021
    ... that it is OK to drive unrealistically fast on a doomed line, and
    brake late into a corner in order to run you challenger (if not yourself
    as well) off the track in order to defend a position.

    Should make for some interesting racing !

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Nov 19 19:09:43 2021
    On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 6:34:26 PM UTC-7, geoff wrote:

    Should make for some interesting racing !

    yes. especially with your queer ass exclamation mark
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Nov 20 10:20:58 2021
    geoff wrote:

    ... that it is OK to drive unrealistically fast on a doomed line, and
    brake late into a corner in order to run you challenger (if not
    yourself as well) off the track in order to defend a position.

    Should make for some interesting racing !


    It's very difficult to see how this decision, the one to not even
    investigate, is consistent with the principle of allowing racing room.

    Makes you wonder whether Verstappen would have got a penalty if
    Hamilton had not avoided him.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Nov 21 00:06:45 2021
    On 20/11/2021 11:20 pm, Bigbird wrote:
    geoff wrote:

    ... that it is OK to drive unrealistically fast on a doomed line, and
    brake late into a corner in order to run you challenger (if not
    yourself as well) off the track in order to defend a position.

    Should make for some interesting racing !


    It's very difficult to see how this decision, the one to not even investigate, is consistent with the principle of allowing racing room.

    Makes you wonder whether Verstappen would have got a penalty if
    Hamilton had not avoided him.


    Well, he would have maintained his WDC lead at the same level, for that
    race at least .


    ! (Just to excite texarse)

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sun Nov 21 00:11:24 2021
    On 20/11/2021 11:20 pm, Bigbird wrote:
    geoff wrote:

    ... that it is OK to drive unrealistically fast on a doomed line, and
    brake late into a corner in order to run you challenger (if not
    yourself as well) off the track in order to defend a position.

    Should make for some interesting racing !


    It's very difficult to see how this decision, the one to not even investigate, is consistent with the principle of allowing racing room.

    Makes you wonder whether Verstappen would have got a penalty if
    Hamilton had not avoided him.

    Or indeed if the drivers roles had been reversed.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Sir Tim@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Nov 20 18:54:56 2021
    Bigbird <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    geoff wrote:

    ... that it is OK to drive unrealistically fast on a doomed line, and
    brake late into a corner in order to run you challenger (if not
    yourself as well) off the track in order to defend a position.

    Should make for some interesting racing !


    It's very difficult to see how this decision, the one to not even investigate, is consistent with the principle of allowing racing room.

    Makes you wonder whether Verstappen would have got a penalty if
    Hamilton had not avoided him.


    Hamilton did in Brazil what Verstappen *should* have done at Silverstone.

    --
    Sir Tim
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From XYXPDQ@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Nov 20 14:18:48 2021
    On Friday, November 19, 2021 at 5:34:26 PM UTC-8, geoff wrote:
    ... that it is OK to drive unrealistically fast on a doomed line, and
    brake late into a corner in order to run you challenger (if not yourself
    as well) off the track in order to defend a position.

    Should make for some interesting racing !

    geoff

    Except there's no consistency in F1. What's allowed in one race may not be in another.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Nov 20 15:14:55 2021
    On 2021-11-20 10:54 a.m., Sir Tim wrote:
    Bigbird <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:
    geoff wrote:

    ... that it is OK to drive unrealistically fast on a doomed line, and
    brake late into a corner in order to run you challenger (if not
    yourself as well) off the track in order to defend a position.

    Should make for some interesting racing !


    It's very difficult to see how this decision, the one to not even
    investigate, is consistent with the principle of allowing racing room.

    Makes you wonder whether Verstappen would have got a penalty if
    Hamilton had not avoided him.


    Hamilton did in Brazil what Verstappen *should* have done at Silverstone.


    And in both cases it should still have been a penalty for the driver on
    the inside for failure to leave room.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)