• Hamilton 'won't let up' after FIA rule out investigation into T-shirt

    From Brian Lawrence@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 13:52:46 2020

    <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice as
    the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
    its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at Sunday's
    race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 09:36:45 2020
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice as
    the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
    its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 10:25:55 2020
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice
    as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand
    Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
    its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
    Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 14:37:56 2020
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice
    as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand
    Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
    Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
    its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at Sunday's race."
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 12:02:33 2020
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
    injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the
    Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
    its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to highlight
    AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
    approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
    you meant by asking the question you did.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 15:23:42 2020
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
    injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the
    Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>


    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
    Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to highlight
    AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
    approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
    you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    Or was something worn at Sunday's race that highlighted police brutality?

    Now fuck along off.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 12:30:11 2020
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
    injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the >>>>>> Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality >>>>>> at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>>


    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
    Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to highlight
    AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
    approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
    you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    And yet I instantly understood what they meant...

    ...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.

    :-)


    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed by
    anyone of even quite modest intelligence.


    Or was something worn at Sunday's race that highlighted police brutality?

    Now fuck along off.

    Right after you!

    :-)

    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bob Latham@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 20:33:24 2020
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
    News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>> Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>> Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
    to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
    throat.


    Bob.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 12:40:28 2020
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
    News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>>>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>>>> Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>> Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>


    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
    to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
    throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to bring politics into their sports...

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 12:42:35 2020
    On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 6:52:53 AM UTC-6, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    Lewis Hamilton

    He's making a fool of himself.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 16:06:35 2020
    On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
    injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at
    the Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>> out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
    highlight AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
    approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
    you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    And yet I instantly understood what they meant...

    ...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.

    :-)


    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.


    You, for example, were there?

    Fuckwit.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 16:07:24 2020
    On 9/15/2020 3:33 PM, Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
    News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>>>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>>>> Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>> Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>


    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
    to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
    throat.


    Bob.



    Bringing disrepute to the sport?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 16:07:55 2020
    On 9/15/2020 3:40 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
    aaa News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>>>>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>>>>> Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>>> Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>>


    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
    to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
    throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to bring politics into their sports...

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.


    As if you care. Moron.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 13:24:37 2020
    On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
    injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at >>>>>>>> the Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>>> out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
    highlight AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
    approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain
    what you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    And yet I instantly understood what they meant...

    ...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.

    :-)


    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed
    by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.


    You, for example, were there?

    No... ...but if there had actually BEEN an incident at the event...

    ...don't you think it might have made the news?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 13:25:02 2020
    On 2020-09-15 1:07 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:40 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
    aaa News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
    injustice
    as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan >>>>>>> Grand
    Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at
    Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>> out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
    to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
    throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
    uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.


    As if you care. Moron.

    I care much more than you do, apparently.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From CS@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 13:29:39 2020
    It wasn't political. It was a statement of fact and that taking a life is a breach of human right to life laid down in most jurisdictions. In UK Art 2 HRA and USA Amendment 15.
    FIA would really confirm being out of touch if they investigated.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 16:41:08 2020
    On 9/15/2020 4:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against >>>>>>>>> injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at >>>>>>>>> the Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>>>> out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality >>>>>> at Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
    highlight AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
    approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain
    what you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    And yet I instantly understood what they meant...

    ...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.

    :-)


    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed
    by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.


    You, for example, were there?

    No... ...but if there had actually BEEN an incident at the event...

    ...don't you think it might have made the news?


    In Tuscany, placing Tuscany in a poor light?

    You do know who runs Tuscany, right?

    LMFAO
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 16:42:13 2020
    On 9/15/2020 4:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 1:07 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:40 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
    aaa News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
    injustice
    as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan >>>>>>>> Grand
    Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at
    Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled >>>>>>>> out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
    to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
    throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
    uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.


    As if you care. Moron.

    I care much more than you do, apparently.

    You care to get the last word, is what you care about, and not only apparently.

    )-;
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 13:52:49 2020
    On 2020-09-15 1:41 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 4:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against >>>>>>>>>> injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at >>>>>>>>>> the Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been >>>>>>>>>> ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
    highlight AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you >>>>>> approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain
    what you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    And yet I instantly understood what they meant...

    ...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.

    :-)


    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed
    by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.


    You, for example, were there?

    No... ...but if there had actually BEEN an incident at the event...

    ...don't you think it might have made the news?


    In Tuscany, placing Tuscany in a poor light?

    You do know who runs Tuscany, right?

    LMFAO

    So they're so powerful that they can keep a secret from everyone at the event...

    ...except Lewis Hamilton?

    And... ...what: they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
    tell a single soul?

    You should really think before you post.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 16:54:50 2020
    On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 6:52:53 AM UTC-6, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."

    If the FIA had a problem with it.
    They would be called racist.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 17:44:19 2020
    On 2020-09-15 4:48 p.m., Sir Tim wrote:
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    -a-a-a-a <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against
    injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the >>>>>>>> Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton >>>>>>>> broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality >>>>>>>> at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>>>>


    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>> Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to highlight >>>> AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you
    approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain what
    you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    And yet I instantly understood what they meant...

    ...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.

    :-)


    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily dismissed by
    anyone of even quite modest intelligence.

    Nevertheless it does demonstrate how careless wording or lack of correct punctuation can completely alter the meaning of a sentence.
    Just saying ...



    Lots of sentences can be misinterpreted...

    ...but when the context in which this one was stated is taken into
    account, this just wasn't one of them.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Mark Jackson@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 21:15:10 2020
    On 9/15/2020 7:48 PM, Sir Tim wrote:
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:

    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily
    dismissed by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.

    Nevertheless it does demonstrate how careless wording or lack of
    correct punctuation can completely alter the meaning of a sentence.

    Not to mention opening the door to annoying pot-stirring.

    --
    Mark Jackson - http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~mjackson
    When all you have is a hammer every problem becomes a nail.
    When all you have is the police every problem becomes a crime.
    - Danielle Ponder
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 14:34:52 2020
    On 16/09/2020 1:36 am, News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice
    as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand
    Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton broke
    its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at
    Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    Did anybody suggest that there was ?

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 14:49:09 2020
    On 16/09/2020 7:33 am, Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,
    News <News@Group.Post> wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against injustice >>>>> as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions at the Tuscan Grand >>>>> Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality at >>>>> Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been ruled out." >>>>>


    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether Hamilton
    broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police brutality
    at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport partly
    to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down their
    throat.

    'Bye!
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 20:10:19 2020
    On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 8:49:12 PM UTC-6, ~misfit~ wrote:

    'Bye!

    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.

    you sad piece of shit
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 20:15:32 2020
    On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 6:44:21 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:

    Lots of sentences can be misinterpreted...

    ...but when the context in which this one was stated is taken into
    account, this just wasn't one of them.

    You...
    should...
    try...
    to...
    form...
    a...
    proper...
    sentence...
    you...
    dumb...
    cunt...
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Sep 15 20:22:41 2020
    On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 8:35:00 PM UTC-6, geoff wrote:

    Did anybody suggest that there was ?

    well it wasnt your boyfriend
    because you had your cock in his mouth
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 10:04:05 2020
    On 9/15/2020 4:52 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 1:41 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 4:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against >>>>>>>>>>> injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions >>>>>>>>>>> at the Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether >>>>>>>>>>> Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been >>>>>>>>>>> ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race?

    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
    highlight AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if you >>>>>>> approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please explain >>>>>>> what you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    And yet I instantly understood what they meant...

    ...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.

    :-)


    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily
    dismissed by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.


    You, for example, were there?


    ...don't you think it might have made the news?


    In Tuscany, placing Tuscany in a poor light?

    You do know who runs Tuscany, right?

    LMFAO

    So they're so powerful that they can keep a secret from everyone at the event...

    ...except Lewis Hamilton?

    And... ...what: they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
    tell a single soul?


    Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at Sunday's race.

    Question: "Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?"

    Response: "No..."

    Surresponse: "And they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
    tell a single soul?"

    Suggesting what, that HAM has a secret? Has knowledge of brutality at
    the event?

    You have outlived your usefulness here, and on the internet generally.

    FOAD.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Brian Lawrence@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 15:34:12 2020
    On 16/09/2020 15:04, News wrote:

    Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at Sunday's race.

    Not that matters, but that wasn't a statement from the FIA, it was a
    report by Andrew Benson, 'Chief F1 writer' for the BBC.

    Question: "Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?"

    Response: "No..."

    Surresponse: "And they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
    tell a single soul?"

    Suggesting what, that HAM has a secret? Has knowledge of brutality at
    the event?

    You have outlived your usefulness here, and on the internet generally.

    FOAD.

    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Mark Jackson@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 11:03:04 2020
    On 9/16/2020 10:34 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
    On 16/09/2020 15:04, News wrote:

    Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at Sunday's race.

    Not that matters, but that wasn't a statement from the FIA, it was a
    report by Andrew Benson, 'Chief F1 writer' for the BBC.

    <Emily Litella>Never mind.</Emily Litella>

    --
    Mark Jackson - http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~mjackson
    When all you have is a hammer every problem becomes a nail.
    When all you have is the police every problem becomes a crime.
    - Danielle Ponder
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bob Latham@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 16:56:16 2020
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
    partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
    their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
    race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.

    Bob.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 09:01:54 2020
    On 2020-09-16 7:04 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 4:52 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 1:41 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 4:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 1:06 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:30 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:23 p.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 3:02 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 11:37 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 1:25 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 6:36 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/15/2020 8:52 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:

    aaaa <https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54161846>

    "Lewis Hamilton says he "won't let up" in his fight against >>>>>>>>>>>> injustice as the FIA decided not to investigate his actions >>>>>>>>>>>> at the Tuscan Grand Prix.

    Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether >>>>>>>>>>>> Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race.

    An FIA spokesman told BBC Sport an investigation had been >>>>>>>>>>>> ruled out."



    Was there police brutality to highlight at Sunday's race? >>>>>>>>>>
    So you're only allowed to protest police brutality...

    ...what exactly should the rule be?


    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    I'm asking you.

    I'm asking you why you CARE if there was police brutality to
    highlight AT Sunday's race.

    You seem to be of the opinion that people can only protest if >>>>>>>> you approve of the circumstances. If that's not true, please
    explain what you meant by asking the question you did.


    My point is it was a poorly worded statement.

    And yet I instantly understood what they meant...

    ...so many the problem was that the statement was poorly worded.

    :-)


    Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?

    No. Quite obviously not, so that interpretation was easily
    dismissed by anyone of even quite modest intelligence.


    You, for example, were there?


    ...don't you think it might have made the news?


    In Tuscany, placing Tuscany in a poor light?

    You do know who runs Tuscany, right?

    LMFAO

    So they're so powerful that they can keep a secret from everyone at
    the event...

    ...except Lewis Hamilton?

    And... ...what: they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
    tell a single soul?


    Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at Sunday's race.

    Question: "Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?"

    Response: "No..."

    Surresponse: "And they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but not
    tell a single soul?"

    Suggesting what, that HAM has a secret? Has knowledge of brutality at
    the event?

    You have outlived your usefulness here, and on the internet generally.

    You've been suggesting that one couldn't dismiss a particular
    interpretation of a sentence by understanding that there might have been
    an actually incident of police brutality at the Tuscan GP...

    ...AND that that could be true while it was magically covered up because
    of "who runs Tuscany"...

    ...BUT that somehow Hamilton knew about it enough to wear a t-shirt...

    ...but that's as far as it went.

    It was absurd.

    There was no incident of police brutality at the event, so all the
    people of normal intelligence dismissed that interpretation of the
    sentence out of hand.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 09:06:24 2020
    On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
    partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
    their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
    uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
    race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.

    Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
    beliefs are not in accord with reality.

    And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bob Latham@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 17:16:26 2020
    In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
    partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
    their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
    uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
    race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.

    Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
    beliefs are not in accord with reality.

    And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?

    Woke is an illness so lets hope so.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 09:24:35 2020
    On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
    partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
    their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
    uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
    race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.

    Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
    beliefs are not in accord with reality.

    And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?

    Woke is an illness so lets hope so.


    But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people from
    the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to indicate
    that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.

    This was no mistake.

    You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone who disagrees with you isn't "normal".
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 12:39:15 2020
    On 9/16/2020 10:34 AM, Brian Lawrence wrote:
    On 16/09/2020 15:04, News wrote:

    Statement: "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting police
    brutality at Sunday's race.

    Not that matters, but that wasn't a statement from the FIA, it was a
    report by Andrew Benson, 'Chief F1 writer' for the BBC.


    Where was it claimed to be an FIA statement?


    Question: "Was there police brutality at Sunday's race?"

    Response: "No..."

    Surresponse: "And they "got to him" so that he'd wear the shirt but
    not tell a single soul?"

    Suggesting what, that HAM has a secret? Has knowledge of brutality at
    the event?

    You have outlived your usefulness here, and on the internet generally.

    FOAD.


    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 12:40:30 2020
    On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
    aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
    partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
    their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
    uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
    race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.

    Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
    beliefs are not in accord with reality.

    And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?

    Woke is an illness so lets hope so.


    But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people from
    the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.

    This was no mistake.

    You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone who disagrees with you isn't "normal".


    L.M.A.O.

    Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 09:44:32 2020
    On 2020-09-16 9:40 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
    aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a >>>>>>> proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
    partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down >>>>>>> their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
    uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on >>>>> race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.

    Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
    beliefs are not in accord with reality.

    And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?

    Woke is an illness so lets hope so.


    But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people from
    the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to
    indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.

    This was no mistake.

    You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone
    who disagrees with you isn't "normal".


    L.M.A.O.

    Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?

    Awww.... ...feeling a little hurt, are you?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 13:31:51 2020
    On 9/16/2020 12:44 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 9:40 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
    aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a >>>>>>>> proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
    partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down >>>>>>>> their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to >>>>>>> bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you >>>>>>> uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on >>>>>> race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.

    Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your
    beliefs are not in accord with reality.

    And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?

    Woke is an illness so lets hope so.


    But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people
    from the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to
    indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.

    This was no mistake.

    You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone
    who disagrees with you isn't "normal".


    L.M.A.O.

    Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?

    Awww.... ...feeling a little hurt, are you?

    Not me, pal. The OP had you dead to rights. Now FOAD.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 10:41:12 2020
    On 2020-09-16 10:31 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/16/2020 12:44 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 9:40 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
    aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a >>>>>>>>> proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport >>>>>>>>> partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down >>>>>>>>> their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to >>>>>>>> bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you >>>>>>>> uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not
    primarily on
    race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke. >>>>>
    Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your >>>>>> beliefs are not in accord with reality.

    And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?

    Woke is an illness so lets hope so.


    But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people
    from the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used to
    indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence.

    This was no mistake.

    You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that anyone
    who disagrees with you isn't "normal".


    L.M.A.O.

    Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?

    Awww.... ...feeling a little hurt, are you?

    Not me, pal. The OP had you dead to rights. Now FOAD.

    Riiiiight.

    That's why you have to get the last word.

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From News@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Sep 16 13:45:11 2020
    On 9/16/2020 1:41 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 10:31 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/16/2020 12:44 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 9:40 a.m., News wrote:
    On 9/16/2020 12:24 PM, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 9:16 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjtd60$ahh$4@dont-email.me>,
    aaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-16 8:56 a.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    aaaa Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether >>>>>>>>>>> Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting >>>>>>>>>>> police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a >>>>>>>>>> proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport >>>>>>>>>> partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down >>>>>>>>>> their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to >>>>>>>>> bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you >>>>>>>>> uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not
    primarily on
    race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters >>>>>>>> worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke. >>>>>>
    Yes... ...but you've already demonstrated numerous times that your >>>>>>> beliefs are not in accord with reality.

    And "left/woke vs NORMAL" is quite telling, isn't it?

    Woke is an illness so lets hope so.


    But you didn't say "left woke", which would be a subset of people
    from the left, you said "left/woke", which is a construction used
    to indicate that either word could stand on its own in your sentence. >>>>>
    This was no mistake.

    You're one of those idiots who is so certain he is right that
    anyone who disagrees with you isn't "normal".


    L.M.A.O.

    Look in the mirror, much, yafuckingpedant?

    Awww.... ...feeling a little hurt, are you?

    Not me, pal. The OP had you dead to rights. Now FOAD.

    Riiiiight.

    That's why you have to get the last word.

    :-)


    Go ahead. Make my day.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Sep 17 11:08:50 2020
    On 17/09/2020 3:56 am, Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr5bd$ig$1@dont-email.me>,
    Alan Baker <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    On 2020-09-15 12:33 p.m., Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <rjr1m4$8uj$1@dont-email.me>,

    Ask FIA.

    "Formula 1's governing body had been considering whether
    Hamilton broke its rules in wearing a T-shirt highlighting
    police brutality at Sunday's race."

    How about -

    Don't bring politics into this sport because it will drive away a
    proportion of our fans and hence revenue. People watch sport
    partly to escape their issues not have someone else's rammed down
    their throat.

    Awwww...

    ...I'm sure there are lots of ways you'd love for sports stars to
    bring politics into their sports...

    Honestly no.

    ...but like so many, when they bring up something that makes you
    uncomfortable, you're suddenly against the concept.

    It does make me uncomfortable that is true.

    I think BLM is very divisive and is splitting people not primarily on
    race but on left/woke V Normal people. It can only make matters
    worse. Resentment is building very clear.

    Fortunately most people in the UK are still sane and are not woke.

    As in asleep. unless actively burying their heads in the sand.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Dex@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Sep 17 12:34:23 2020
    On 15/09/2020 21:31, CS wrote:
    It wasn't political. It was a statement of fact and that taking a life is a breach of human right to life laid down in most jurisdictions. In UK Art 2 HRA and USA Amendment 15.
    FIA would really confirm being out of touch if they investigated.



    The 15th Amendment - rCLThe right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.rCY

    I know Trump is trying to stop postal voting, but I don't think
    Hamilton's T-shirt has got anything to do with that.

    Perhaps you mean the 14th Amendment?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Sep 18 11:58:04 2020
    On 17/09/2020 11:34 pm, Dex wrote:
    On 15/09/2020 21:31, CS wrote:
    It wasn't political.-a It was a statement of fact and that taking a life is a breach of human
    right to life laid down in most jurisdictions. In UK Art 2 HRA and USA Amendment 15.
    FIA would really confirm being out of touch if they investigated.



    The 15th Amendment - rCLThe right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or
    abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of
    servitude.rCY

    You are aware that 'convicts' or 'ex-convicts' aren't allowed to vote in the US yeah? This
    disproportionately affects people of colour as there is a multi-billion dollar a year business
    which requires them to be criminalised and then used as slaves.

    Just an FYI... I'm over this thread but there are only so many people I can put in my killfile.
    (Rule of thumb for killfile for me is ratio of on-topic factual or interesting posts to OT wank.
    IOW S/N ratio.)

    I know Trump is trying to stop postal voting, but I don't think Hamilton's T-shirt has got anything
    to do with that.

    Perhaps you mean the 14th Amendment?

    I'm interested in Formula 1 for the racing and technology. I stopped watching podiums and
    interviews a year or two ago as they're increasingly irrelevant to and distract from the on-track
    action.

    In fact I often find podiums in particular crass and cringe-worthy. I get the whole 'release of
    tension' thing but some things should be done in private IMO.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Colin Stone@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Sep 17 23:50:15 2020
    Apologies. 14.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Sep 18 07:23:08 2020
    On Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 5:58:08 PM UTC-6, ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 17/09/2020 11:34 pm, Dex wrote:
    On 15/09/2020 21:31, CS wrote:
    It wasn't political. It was a statement of fact and that taking a life is a breach of human
    right to life laid down in most jurisdictions. In UK Art 2 HRA and USA Amendment 15.
    FIA would really confirm being out of touch if they investigated.



    The 15th Amendment - rCLThe right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or
    abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of
    servitude.rCY
    You are aware that 'convicts' or 'ex-convicts' aren't allowed to vote in the US yeah? This
    disproportionately affects people of colour as there is a multi-billion dollar a year business
    which requires them to be criminalised and then used as slaves.

    Just an FYI... I'm over this thread but there are only so many people I can put in my killfile.
    (Rule of thumb for killfile for me is ratio of on-topic factual or interesting posts to OT wank.
    IOW S/N ratio.)
    I know Trump is trying to stop postal voting, but I don't think Hamilton's T-shirt has got anything
    to do with that.

    Perhaps you mean the 14th Amendment?
    I'm interested in Formula 1 for the racing and technology. I stopped watching podiums and
    interviews a year or two ago as they're increasingly irrelevant to and distract from the on-track
    action.

    In fact I often find podiums in particular crass and cringe-worthy. I get the whole 'release of
    tension' thing but some things should be done in private IMO.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    Fuck you and your pathetic killfile, ass fucker.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Sep 18 07:33:34 2020
    On Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 5:58:08 PM UTC-6, ~misfit~ wrote:

    Just an FYI... I'm over this thread but there are only so many people I can put in my killfile.
    (Rule of thumb for killfile for me is ratio of on-topic factual or interesting posts to OT wank.
    IOW S/N ratio.)

    fuck off hypocrite, cock sucker, mother fucker, cunt hole
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Sep 18 15:15:12 2020
    On Thursday, September 17, 2020 at 5:58:08 PM UTC-6, ~misfit~ wrote:

    my killfile.

    killfile for me

    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.

    Get a fucking life.
    You weird ass cock sucker.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)