• Hamilton Has More Talent

    From Heron@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Oct 27 09:54:02 2020
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder: https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/1388392655-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From RzR@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 08:14:43 2020
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/


    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder: https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/1388392655-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Colin Stone@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 01:15:03 2020
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Colin Stone@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 01:16:44 2020
    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.
    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 23:51:46 2020
    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa
    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:
    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/1388392655-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher looks like it's a poor photoshop job.
    The head doesn't seem right on the neck (and I watched Schumacher for years). --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 11:51:16 2020
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa

    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more
    talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:

    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926 55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher looks
    like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right on the
    neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari

    --
    Bozo bin
    Texasgate
    Heron
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From RzR@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 15:39:55 2020
    On 10/28/2020 2:51 PM, Bigbird wrote:
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa

    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more
    talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:

    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher looks
    like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right on the
    neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    does anyone know the exercises the racing drivers are doing to get their
    neck stronger?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 01:56:52 2020
    On 29/10/2020 12:51 am, Bigbird wrote:
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa

    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more
    talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:

    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher looks
    like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right on the
    neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari

    Thanks. The injury must be why it appears to me that he's carrying his head differently in that pic.
    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 15:11:54 2020
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:51:16 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa
    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more
    talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:

    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher looks
    like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right on the
    neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    So the photo of Hamilton is him at his peak, the one of Schumacher is
    after he retired and before he came back - typical Heron prickery in
    other words.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 15:18:22 2020
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Heron@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 10:50:31 2020
    On 10/28/2020 10:11 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:51:16 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa

    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more
    talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:

    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg >>>>> or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher looks
    like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right on the
    neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    So the photo of Hamilton is him at his peak, the one of Schumacher is
    after he retired and before he came back - typical Heron prickery in
    other words.

    For all those here dumb enough to believe that Schumacher
    ever REMOTELY possessed the body builder physique (only
    producible through hard work) of Hamilton.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 07:50:16 2020
    On 29/10/2020 4:18 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)


    Oddly it is usually the best drivers that seem to get hired to drive the
    best cars. Now, why could that be ???

    Maybe a reverse-driver should be imposed. The best drivers have to go in
    the worst cars. Like the reverse-grid logic.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From keithr0@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 09:04:19 2020
    On 10/29/2020 4:50 AM, geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 4:18 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the
    optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to
    keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip
    while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a
    great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too,
    albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the
    consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so
    impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters. >>>
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)


    Oddly it is usually the best drivers that seem to get hired to drive the best cars. Now, why could that be ???

    Maybe a reverse-driver should be imposed. The best drivers have to go in
    the worst cars. Like the reverse-grid logic.

    geoff

    What about a one design series? All drivers in identical cars of a type
    that none of them has driven before, cars swapped randomly between races
    to ensure equality. Shortish races requiring no pit stops with tyres
    that will just last the distance (if treated properly), no engineer on
    the radio helping with tactics etc.

    Obviously it isn't going to happen but I'd lay odds that it would throw
    up a bunch of surprises.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 12:36:59 2020
    On 29/10/2020 12:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 4:50 AM, geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 4:18 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the
    optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to
    keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip
    while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a
    great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too,
    albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the
    consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so
    impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around
    falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)


    Oddly it is usually the best drivers that seem to get hired to drive
    the best cars. Now, why could that be ???

    Maybe a reverse-driver should be imposed. The best drivers have to go
    in the worst cars. Like the reverse-grid logic.

    geoff

    What about a one design series? All drivers in identical cars of a type
    that none of them has driven before, cars swapped randomly between races
    to ensure equality. Shortish races requiring no pit stops with tyres
    that will just last the distance (if treated properly), no engineer on
    the radio helping with tactics etc.

    Obviously it isn't going to happen but I'd lay odds that it would throw
    up a bunch of surprises.

    Format already catered for in numerous formulas/series.

    Would stifle the innovation and progress that F1 is all about.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From dnucpeyr@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 16:52:02 2020
    On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 14:54:03 UTC, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder: https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/1388392655-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    Hamilton, beaten by Journeyman Rosberg in 2016 and dominated by Button over 2011. What else, out-qualified over the season by Rosberg in 2014.
    2014-2020 the hybrid-era aka F1 becomes WWE. Vettel's titles in the Red Bull even have more credibility than Hamilton's in the Mercedes spaceship.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 00:40:36 2020
    RzR wrote:

    On 10/28/2020 2:51 PM, Bigbird wrote:
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa


    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below
    for proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has
    more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:


    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or

    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher
    looks like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right
    on the neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).


    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    does anyone know the exercises the racing drivers are doing to get
    their neck stronger?

    Here's one, new to me
    https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/videos/232908377821704

    More typically
    Driver Fitness: Strengthening the Neck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K1X2MredgM



    --
    Bozo bin
    Texasgate
    Heron
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 28 18:14:48 2020
    On Wednesday, October 28, 2020 at 9:50:31 AM UTC-6, Heron wrote:

    body builder physique

    you fag
    that is geoff's gig
    logoff queer
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From keithr0@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 11:25:06 2020
    On 10/29/2020 9:36 AM, geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 12:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 4:50 AM, geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 4:18 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the
    optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to
    keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of
    grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a
    great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too,
    albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the
    consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so
    impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around
    falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably >>>> more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant >>>> eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know >>>> in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends >>>> ;)


    Oddly it is usually the best drivers that seem to get hired to drive
    the best cars. Now, why could that be ???

    Maybe a reverse-driver should be imposed. The best drivers have to go
    in the worst cars. Like the reverse-grid logic.

    geoff

    What about a one design series? All drivers in identical cars of a
    type that none of them has driven before, cars swapped randomly
    between races to ensure equality. Shortish races requiring no pit
    stops with tyres that will just last the distance (if treated
    properly), no engineer on the radio helping with tactics etc.

    Obviously it isn't going to happen but I'd lay odds that it would
    throw up a bunch of surprises.

    Format already catered for in numerous formulas/series.

    Would stifle the innovation and progress that F1 is all about.

    geoff

    The idea would be in addition to rather than instead of.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From crms...@gmail.com@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 00:22:11 2020
    Hamilton, beaten by Journeyman Rosberg in 2016..
    Only because of an engine failure late in the season and not enough races to make up the points loss.
    But yes, his early years were a little hit and miss. I don't think his mental "compartmentisation" is what it is today where he can cut everything unnecessary out. His qualifying a few races back where he had an awful Q1 and Q2 and put it on pole just shows his ability to focus and focus some more.
    And last weekend was a crushing demonstration of what he can achieve against a fast team mate who claimed on Saturday "I have the speed". But on Sunday, having got the lead, didn't make a mistake but just couldn't keep it and had to watch LH's exhaust pipe disappearing into the distance. Biggest winning margin all season and a true thrashing of a team mate.
    One comment I read, and can't now find it, said that the Portimao race was the easiest way to explain to an F1 novice why LH is so good.
    This article is a good read: https://www.motorsportmagazine.com/articles/single-seaters/f1/f1s-other-guys-the-crushing-reality-for-team-mates-of-the-greats
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 08:40:32 2020
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 10:50:31 -0500, Heron <McKeister@ipanywhere.com>
    wrote:

    On 10/28/2020 10:11 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:51:16 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa

    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more
    talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:

    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg >>>>>> or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926 >>>>>> 55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher looks
    like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right on the
    neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    So the photo of Hamilton is him at his peak, the one of Schumacher is
    after he retired and before he came back - typical Heron prickery in
    other words.

    For all those here dumb enough to believe that Schumacher
    ever REMOTELY possessed the body builder physique (only
    producible through hard work) of Hamilton.

    https://www.newsbreak.com/news/1192632059792/fitness-freak-michael-schumacher-blood-tests-during-pit-stops
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 09:49:01 2020
    Heron wrote:

    On 10/28/2020 10:11 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:51:16 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa


    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see
    below for proof positive also) and the record clearly shows
    who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:


    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or

    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as
    hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher
    looks like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem
    right on the neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).


    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    So the photo of Hamilton is him at his peak, the one of Schumacher
    is after he retired and before he came back - typical Heron
    prickery in other words.

    For all those here dumb enough to believe that Schumacher
    ever REMOTELY possessed the body builder physique (only
    producible through hard work) of Hamilton.

    Just makes you look like a small minded little man doesn't it.

    https://as.com/motor/imagenes/2009/08/06/mas_motor/1249573818_740215_0000000001_noticia_grande.jpg

    For your scrap book; an appropriate place to archive your comments. ;)

    --
    Bozo bin
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 12:25:39 2020
    On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 09:49:01 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird" <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    Heron wrote:

    On 10/28/2020 10:11 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:51:16 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa

    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see
    below for proof positive also) and the record clearly shows
    who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:


    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as
    hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher
    looks like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem
    right on the neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    So the photo of Hamilton is him at his peak, the one of Schumacher
    is after he retired and before he came back - typical Heron
    prickery in other words.

    For all those here dumb enough to believe that Schumacher
    ever REMOTELY possessed the body builder physique (only
    producible through hard work) of Hamilton.

    Just makes you look like a small minded little man doesn't it.

    https://as.com/motor/imagenes/2009/08/06/mas_motor/1249573818_740215_0000000001_noticia_grande.jpg

    For your scrap book; an appropriate place to archive your comments. ;)

    We need to be careful with all these bare chests, Texasgate is likely
    to have an orgasmic explosion ;)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Sir Tim@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 20:55:32 2020
    geoff <geoff@nospamgeoffwood.org> wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 12:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 4:50 AM, geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 4:18 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the
    optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to
    keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip >>>>> while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a
    great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too,
    albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the
    consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so
    impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around
    falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably >>>> more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant >>>> eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know >>>> in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends >>>> ;)


    Oddly it is usually the best drivers that seem to get hired to drive
    the best cars. Now, why could that be ???

    Maybe a reverse-driver should be imposed. The best drivers have to go
    in the worst cars. Like the reverse-grid logic.

    geoff

    What about a one design series? All drivers in identical cars of a type
    that none of them has driven before, cars swapped randomly between races
    to ensure equality. Shortish races requiring no pit stops with tyres
    that will just last the distance (if treated properly), no engineer on
    the radio helping with tactics etc.

    Obviously it isn't going to happen but I'd lay odds that it would throw
    up a bunch of surprises.

    Format already catered for in numerous formulas/series.

    Would stifle the innovation and progress that F1 is all about.

    +1

    --
    Sir Tim
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From RzR@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 08:48:38 2020
    On 10/29/2020 3:40 AM, Bigbird wrote:
    RzR wrote:

    On 10/28/2020 2:51 PM, Bigbird wrote:
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa


    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below
    for proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has
    more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:


    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or

    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher
    looks like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right
    on the neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).


    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    does anyone know the exercises the racing drivers are doing to get
    their neck stronger?

    Here's one, new to me https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/videos/232908377821704

    More typically
    Driver Fitness: Strengthening the Neck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K1X2MredgM





    damn, that first one...

    thanks...
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 29 22:58:51 2020
    On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 11:48:40 PM UTC-6, RzR wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 3:40 AM, Bigbird wrote:
    RzR wrote:

    On 10/28/2020 2:51 PM, Bigbird wrote:
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa


    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below
    for proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has
    more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:


    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or

    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher
    looks like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right
    on the neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).


    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    does anyone know the exercises the racing drivers are doing to get
    their neck stronger?

    Here's one, new to me https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/videos/232908377821704

    More typically
    Driver Fitness: Strengthening the Neck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K1X2MredgM



    damn, that first one...

    thanks...

    geoff is very interested in your tiny erection
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From RzR@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 09:27:02 2020
    On 10/29/2020 2:52 AM, dnucpeyr@warpmail.net wrote:
    On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 14:54:03 UTC, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa
    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:
    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/1388392655-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    Hamilton, beaten by Journeyman Rosberg in 2016 and dominated by Button over 2011. What else, out-qualified over the season by Rosberg in 2014.
    2014-2020 the hybrid-era aka F1 becomes WWE. Vettel's titles in the Red Bull even have more credibility than Hamilton's in the Mercedes spaceship.


    bwahaha
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From RzR@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 09:44:23 2020
    On 10/30/2020 8:58 AM, texas gate wrote:


    geoff is very interested in your tiny erection


    clearly I was referring to degree of difficulty and trust
    required...take your shit to a different ng...we know you have them
    bookmarked already...
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 00:09:26 2020
    On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 at 11:14:45 PM UTC-6, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/


    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder: https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/1388392655-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg

    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    yup, jack off time
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 00:10:23 2020
    On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 12:27:03 AM UTC-6, RzR wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 2:52 AM, dnuc...@warpmail.net wrote:
    On Tuesday, 27 October 2020 14:54:03 UTC, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa
    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:
    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg >> or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/1388392655-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    Hamilton, beaten by Journeyman Rosberg in 2016 and dominated by Button over 2011. What else, out-qualified over the season by Rosberg in 2014.
    2014-2020 the hybrid-era aka F1 becomes WWE. Vettel's titles in the Red Bull even have more credibility than Hamilton's in the Mercedes spaceship.

    bwahaha

    clearly
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 00:17:52 2020
    On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 11:48:40 PM UTC-6, RzR wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 3:40 AM, Bigbird wrote:
    RzR wrote:

    On 10/28/2020 2:51 PM, Bigbird wrote:
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa


    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below
    for proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has
    more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:


    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or

    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher
    looks like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right
    on the neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).


    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    does anyone know the exercises the racing drivers are doing to get
    their neck stronger?

    Here's one, new to me https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/videos/232908377821704

    More typically
    Driver Fitness: Strengthening the Neck https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K1X2MredgM



    damn, that first one...

    thanks...

    hey rzr
    got any more pics of shirtless f1 drivers?
    you pig
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From RzR@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 11:00:40 2020
    On 10/30/2020 10:17 AM, texas gate wrote:
    On Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 11:48:40 PM UTC-6, RzR wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 3:40 AM, Bigbird wrote:
    RzR wrote:

    On 10/28/2020 2:51 PM, Bigbird wrote:
    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa


    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/

    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below
    for proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has
    more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:


    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg >>>>>>>> or

    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926
    55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher
    looks like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right
    on the neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).


    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari


    does anyone know the exercises the racing drivers are doing to get
    their neck stronger?

    Here's one, new to me
    https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/videos/232908377821704

    More typically
    Driver Fitness: Strengthening the Neck
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6K1X2MredgM



    damn, that first one...

    thanks...

    hey rzr
    got any more pics of shirtless f1 drivers?
    you pig


    hold on a sec...doing neck exercises from the first video with the
    elastic band...i hope it holds...
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From RzR@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 11:18:13 2020
    On 10/30/2020 10:09 AM, texas gate wrote:
    On Tuesday, October 27, 2020 at 11:14:45 PM UTC-6, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa
    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/


    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:
    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg
    or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/1388392655-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg

    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    yup, jack off time


    why did you add "time" at the end of your name sig?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 09:29:14 2020
    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in
    that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny"

    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done
    almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my
    class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    And as far as my own "puttering" goes, I don't think being the second
    fastest driver around our track in a Formula F is too bad...

    ...especially as one of the other guys who is slower than I am is the
    2015 US SCCA Runoffs champion.

    But then, what would the timing and scoring system know?

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 09:32:26 2020
    On 2020-10-28 8:50 a.m., Heron wrote:
    On 10/28/2020 10:11 AM, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:51:16 -0000 (UTC), "Bigbird"
    <bigbird.nospam.usenet@gmail.com> wrote:

    ~misfit~ wrote:

    On 28/10/2020 6:14 pm, RzR wrote:
    On 10/27/2020 5:54 PM, Heron wrote:
    Schumacher worked harder, Hamilton has more talent - Massa

    https://us.motorsport.com/f1/news/schumacher-hamilton-comparison-massa/4899863/


    Half true, but Hamilton conspicuously works harder (see below for
    proof positive also) and the record clearly shows who has more
    talent.

    You tell me who looks like he's worked harder:

    https://i.pinimg.com/474x/8d/51/3b/8d513b9b8efe83dd77154dab663da0f3.jpg >>>>>> or
    https://im.indiatimes.in/content/itimes/photo/2013/Dec/30/13883926 >>>>>> 55-michael-schumacher-shirtless.jpg


    I don't like Schumi, but in those pics, both look fit as hell...

    I may be overly... sceptical but to me that pic of Schumacher looks
    like it's a poor photoshop job. The head doesn't seem right on the
    neck (and I watched Schumacher for years).

    https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2009/aug/04/michael-schumacher-neck-injury-ferrari



    So the photo of Hamilton is him at his peak, the one of Schumacher is
    after he retired and before he came back - typical Heron prickery in
    other words.

    For all those here dumb enough to believe that Schumacher
    ever REMOTELY possessed the body builder physique (only
    producible through hard work) of Hamilton.

    Spoken like a true fan gurl!

    Did you turn that picture into a poster for your wall?

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 09:33:54 2020
    On 2020-10-28 11:50 a.m., geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 4:18 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the
    optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to
    keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip
    while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a
    great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too,
    albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the
    consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so
    impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters. >>>
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)


    Oddly it is usually the best drivers that seem to get hired to drive the best cars. Now, why could that be ???

    It's not odd at all.

    But acknowledging that a particular car is the best AND that the car is
    a larger part of victory than the driver is just being honest.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 09:34:41 2020
    On 2020-10-28 4:04 p.m., keithr0 wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 4:50 AM, geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 4:18 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the
    optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to
    keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip
    while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a
    great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too,
    albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the
    consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so
    impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around
    falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)


    Oddly it is usually the best drivers that seem to get hired to drive
    the best cars. Now, why could that be ???

    Maybe a reverse-driver should be imposed. The best drivers have to go
    in the worst cars. Like the reverse-grid logic.

    geoff

    What about a one design series? All drivers in identical cars of a type
    that none of them has driven before, cars swapped randomly between races
    to ensure equality. Shortish races requiring no pit stops with tyres
    that will just last the distance (if treated properly), no engineer on
    the radio helping with tactics etc.

    Obviously it isn't going to happen but I'd lay odds that it would throw
    up a bunch of surprises.

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak of
    the sport.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 09:35:10 2020
    On 2020-10-28 4:36 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 12:04 pm, keithr0 wrote:
    On 10/29/2020 4:50 AM, geoff wrote:
    On 29/10/2020 4:18 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the
    optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to
    keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of
    grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a
    great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too,
    albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the
    consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so
    impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around
    falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably >>>> more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant >>>> eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know >>>> in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends >>>> ;)


    Oddly it is usually the best drivers that seem to get hired to drive
    the best cars. Now, why could that be ???

    Maybe a reverse-driver should be imposed. The best drivers have to go
    in the worst cars. Like the reverse-grid logic.

    geoff

    What about a one design series? All drivers in identical cars of a
    type that none of them has driven before, cars swapped randomly
    between races to ensure equality. Shortish races requiring no pit
    stops with tyres that will just last the distance (if treated
    properly), no engineer on the radio helping with tactics etc.

    Obviously it isn't going to happen but I'd lay odds that it would
    throw up a bunch of surprises.

    Format already catered for in numerous formulas/series.

    Would stifle the innovation and progress that F1 is all about.

    These days, F1 is far more about stifling innovation and progress than fostering it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 00:46:24 2020
    Alan Baker wrote:

    Spoken like a true fan gurl!


    <sigh>

    --
    Bozo bin
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 00:49:31 2020
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak
    of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts
    claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 17:49:40 2020
    On 2020-10-30 5:46 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    Spoken like a true fan gurl!


    <sigh>


    You have your way... ...I have mine.

    And remember: I have SEEN your way in other fora.

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 18:00:11 2020
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak
    of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet your
    life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 01:01:44 2020
    Alan Baker wrote:

    On 2020-10-30 5:46 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    Spoken like a true fan gurl!


    <sigh>


    You have your way... ...I have mine.

    And remember: I have SEEN your way in other fora.


    (ITYM forum, singular.)

    WTF is that meant to mean? If you think this group is anything like the
    one you are referring to you should just leave. You are only going to
    continue making an arse of yourself until everyone filters you.

    I have rather more respect for this forum and most of the people here.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Alan Baker
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 18:02:55 2020
    On 2020-10-30 6:01 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    On 2020-10-30 5:46 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    Spoken like a true fan gurl!


    <sigh>


    You have your way... ...I have mine.

    And remember: I have SEEN your way in other fora.


    (ITYM forum, singular.)

    Do I?


    WTF is that meant to mean? If you think this group is anything like the
    one you are referring to you should just leave. You are only going to continue making an arse of yourself until everyone filters you.

    It means you don't mind behaving in much the same way with others as I
    behave here with a select few.


    I have rather more respect for this forum and most of the people here.

    Tell it to "Doofus".

    ;-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 18:41:22 2020
    On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 7:02:57 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 6:01 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    On 2020-10-30 5:46 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    Spoken like a true fan gurl!


    <sigh>


    You have your way... ...I have mine.

    And remember: I have SEEN your way in other fora.


    (ITYM forum, singular.)
    Do I?

    WTF is that meant to mean? If you think this group is anything like the one you are referring to you should just leave. You are only going to continue making an arse of yourself until everyone filters you.
    It means you don't mind behaving in much the same way with others as I behave here with a select few.

    I have rather more respect for this forum and most of the people here.
    Tell it to "Doofus".

    ;-)

    hey numbnuts
    you are back in bigturds
    hollow killfile for the 11th time
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 18:43:27 2020
    On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 7:41:24 PM UTC-6, texas gate wrote:
    On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 7:02:57 PM UTC-6, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 6:01 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    On 2020-10-30 5:46 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    Spoken like a true fan gurl!


    <sigh>


    You have your way... ...I have mine.

    And remember: I have SEEN your way in other fora.


    (ITYM forum, singular.)
    Do I?

    WTF is that meant to mean? If you think this group is anything like the one you are referring to you should just leave. You are only going to continue making an arse of yourself until everyone filters you.
    It means you don't mind behaving in much the same way with others as I behave here with a select few.

    I have rather more respect for this forum and most of the people here.
    Tell it to "Doofus".

    ;-)
    hey numbnuts
    you are back in bigturds
    hollow killfile for the 11th time

    oh and heron back out
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 15:36:01 2020
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak
    of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts
    claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet your
    life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?

    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 19:48:03 2020
    On 2020-10-30 7:36 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak
    of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts
    claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet your
    life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?

    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    "Probably RUS" says it all.


    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Nope.


    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    No, I absolutely would not.

    The point is that you've just admitted that the car is more important
    than the driver.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 16:25:29 2020
    On 31/10/2020 3:48 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 7:36 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak
    of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts >>>> claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet your
    life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?

    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    "Probably RUS" says it all.


    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Nope.


    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    No, I absolutely would not.

    The point is that you've just admitted that the car is more important
    than the driver.


    No, it means that RUSs car is *significantly* inferior, possibly not
    able to be compensated for by any amount driver skill.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 16:30:39 2020
    On 31/10/2020 4:25 pm, geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 3:48 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 7:36 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak >>>>>> of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts >>>>> claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet your
    life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?

    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    "Probably RUS" says it all.


    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Nope.


    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    No, I absolutely would not.

    The point is that you've just admitted that the car is more important
    than the driver.


    No, it means that RUSs car is *significantly* inferior, possibly not
    able to be compensated for by any amount driver skill.

    geoff

    If you want a more valid comparison, let HAM and RUS each do 50 laps, in traffic, in each of the cars in turn, in identically altering weather conditions, and compare that.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 20:43:03 2020
    On 2020-10-30 8:25 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 3:48 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 7:36 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak >>>>>> of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts >>>>> claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet your
    life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?

    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    "Probably RUS" says it all.


    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Nope.


    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    No, I absolutely would not.

    The point is that you've just admitted that the car is more important
    than the driver.


    No, it means that RUSs car is *significantly* inferior, possibly not
    able to be compensated for by any amount driver skill.

    geoff

    Which proves the point...

    ...but you just don't see it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 20:43:31 2020
    On 2020-10-30 8:30 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 4:25 pm, geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 3:48 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 7:36 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak >>>>>>> of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little
    butthurts
    claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet
    your life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?

    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    "Probably RUS" says it all.


    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !)
    and would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Nope.


    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    No, I absolutely would not.

    The point is that you've just admitted that the car is more important
    than the driver.


    No, it means that RUSs car is *significantly* inferior, possibly not
    able to be compensated for by any amount driver skill.

    geoff

    If you want a more valid comparison, let HAM and RUS each do 50 laps, in traffic, in each of the cars in turn, in identically altering weather conditions, and compare that.

    geoff

    I get it: you don't get it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From geoff@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 17:46:50 2020
    On 31/10/2020 4:43 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 8:25 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 3:48 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 7:36 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak >>>>>>> of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little
    butthurts
    claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet
    your life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?

    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    "Probably RUS" says it all.


    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !)
    and would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Nope.


    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    No, I absolutely would not.

    The point is that you've just admitted that the car is more important
    than the driver.


    No, it means that RUSs car is *significantly* inferior, possibly not
    able to be compensated for by any amount driver skill.

    geoff

    Which proves the point...

    ...but you just don't see it.


    Oh I see it alright. Merc is undoubtedly the best car.

    But what you don't see, or rather pathetically attempt to deny, is that
    your reason for stressing the point at every opportunity is to somehow diminish HAMs status as being amongst the great F1 divers.

    Oh no, not great at all. Just lucky to always be in the best car.

    geoff
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 30 22:25:46 2020
    On 2020-10-30 9:46 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 4:43 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 8:25 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 3:48 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 7:36 p.m., geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak >>>>>>>> of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little
    butthurts
    claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet
    your life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?

    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    "Probably RUS" says it all.


    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !)
    and would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Nope.


    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    No, I absolutely would not.

    The point is that you've just admitted that the car is more
    important than the driver.


    No, it means that RUSs car is *significantly* inferior, possibly not
    able to be compensated for by any amount driver skill.

    geoff

    Which proves the point...

    ...but you just don't see it.


    Oh I see it alright. Merc is undoubtedly the best car.

    But what you don't see, or rather pathetically attempt to deny, is that
    your reason for stressing the point at every opportunity is to somehow diminish HAMs status as being amongst the great F1 divers.

    Oh no, not great at all. Just lucky to always be in the best car.


    I have literally said he among the very best.

    So... ...you're full of shit.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 09:14:29 2020
    On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:29:14 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in
    that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny"

    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done >almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my
    class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    Wow, putting yourself on a par with that list is something special,,
    even for someone with your level of egotism.


    And as far as my own "puttering" goes, I don't think being the second >fastest driver around our track in a Formula F is too bad...

    ...especially as one of the other guys who is slower than I am is the
    2015 US SCCA Runoffs champion.

    But then, what would the timing and scoring system know?

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 07:00:29 2020
    On 2020-10-31 2:14 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:29:14 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in
    that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny" >>
    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done
    almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my
    class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    Wow, putting yourself on a par with that list is something special,,
    even for someone with your level of egotism.

    Nope. I said I'm in "good company".

    That in no way implies I think I'm on par with any of them.

    Just pointing out that your implications about the class are complete
    and utter bullshit.

    I am faster around Mission than the 2015 US amateur champion, though. So whatever I'm doing, it's hardly "puttering". You should watch some FF
    some time. You'll see some real racing.

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From dlpleae@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 07:20:47 2020
    On Saturday, October 31, 2020 at 2:36:11 AM UTC, geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak
    of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts
    claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet your
    life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?
    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    geoff

    They don't have to swap cars. Put 'Lewis the Sheep-Shagger Hamilton' in the Williams and Russel would beat him.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Bigbird@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 18:01:10 2020
    geoff wrote:

    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...


    That Alan chooses to ask such infantile questions says plenty.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Texasgate
    Alan Baker
    Enjoy!
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 11:21:23 2020
    On 2020-10-31 11:01 a.m., Bigbird wrote:
    geoff wrote:

    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...


    That Alan chooses to ask such infantile questions says plenty.


    Why is it "infantile"?

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Sat Oct 31 11:21:33 2020
    On 2020-10-31 7:20 a.m., dlpleae wrote:
    On Saturday, October 31, 2020 at 2:36:11 AM UTC, geoff wrote:
    On 31/10/2020 2:00 pm, Alan Baker wrote:
    On 2020-10-30 5:49 p.m., Bigbird wrote:
    Alan Baker wrote:

    It's been done... ...and it just isn't that interesting at the peak
    of the sport.

    It would have to be more interesting than have boring little butthurts >>>> claiming "it's only because of the car" incessantly.


    Who has ever said "it is ONLY because of the car", sunshine?

    :-)

    Just answer this:

    Have George Russell and Hamilton swap cars, and you have to bet your
    life on which will now win.

    Which way will you bet?
    Probably RUS, but not necessarily.

    But put them in the same car (well not the actual SAME one car !) and
    would you seriously vote for RUS ?

    Actually, given your obvious biased POV, you probably would...

    geoff

    They don't have to swap cars. Put 'Lewis the Sheep-Shagger Hamilton' in the Williams and Russel would beat him.


    Boring.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Nov 2 16:26:04 2020
    On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:00:29 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-31 2:14 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:29:14 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly
    would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points
    behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes
    this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport,
    which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the
    team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to
    deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably >>>> more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built
    up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant >>>> eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant
    forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know >>>> in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends >>>> ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in
    that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny"

    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done
    almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my
    class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    Wow, putting yourself on a par with that list is something special,,
    even for someone with your level of egotism.

    Nope. I said I'm in "good company".

    That in no way implies I think I'm on par with any of them.

    Like most egotists, you can't see your own egotism in describing
    yourself in the company of drivers who have all moved well beyond
    puttering around in lesser cars.



    Just pointing out that your implications about the class are complete
    and utter bullshit.

    I am faster around Mission than the 2015 US amateur champion, though. So >whatever I'm doing, it's hardly "puttering". You should watch some FF
    some time. You'll see some real racing.

    :-)

    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Mon Nov 2 08:55:13 2020
    On 2020-11-02 8:26 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:00:29 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-31 2:14 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:29:14 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly >>>>> would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where
    Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he
    could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points >>>>> behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes >>>>> this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport, >>>>> which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the >>>>> team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to >>>>> deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same
    applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably >>>>> more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built >>>>> up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant >>>>> eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant >>>>> forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing
    now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know >>>>> in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends >>>>> ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in >>>> that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he
    had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny"

    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done >>>> almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my >>>> class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    Wow, putting yourself on a par with that list is something special,,
    even for someone with your level of egotism.

    Nope. I said I'm in "good company".

    That in no way implies I think I'm on par with any of them.

    Like most egotists, you can't see your own egotism in describing
    yourself in the company of drivers who have all moved well beyond
    puttering around in lesser cars.

    Nope. I'm pointing out that those supposedly "lesser cars" were and are
    a very important class for developing race drivers.

    By no means am I trying to suggest that I'm am on par with any of them.




    Just pointing out that your implications about the class are complete
    and utter bullshit.

    I am faster around Mission than the 2015 US amateur champion, though. So
    whatever I'm doing, it's hardly "puttering". You should watch some FF
    some time. You'll see some real racing.
    Nothing to say?

    Tell me: how fast do you think my "puttering" little car goes?

    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Nov 3 13:28:49 2020
    On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:55:13 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-02 8:26 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:00:29 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-31 2:14 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:29:14 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly >>>>>> would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where >>>>>> Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he >>>>>> could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points >>>>>> behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes >>>>>> this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport, >>>>>> which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the >>>>>> team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to >>>>>> deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same >>>>>> applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably >>>>>> more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built >>>>>> up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant >>>>>> eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant >>>>>> forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing >>>>>> now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know >>>>>> in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends >>>>>> ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in >>>>> that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny"

    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done >>>>> almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my >>>>> class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    Wow, putting yourself on a par with that list is something special,,
    even for someone with your level of egotism.

    Nope. I said I'm in "good company".

    That in no way implies I think I'm on par with any of them.

    Like most egotists, you can't see your own egotism in describing
    yourself in the company of drivers who have all moved well beyond
    puttering around in lesser cars.

    Nope. I'm pointing out that those supposedly "lesser cars" were and are
    a very important class for developing race drivers.

    By no means am I trying to suggest that I'm am on par with any of them.




    Just pointing out that your implications about the class are complete
    and utter bullshit.

    I am faster around Mission than the 2015 US amateur champion, though. So >>> whatever I'm doing, it's hardly "puttering". You should watch some FF
    some time. You'll see some real racing.
    Nothing to say?

    Tell me: how fast do you think my "puttering" little car goes?

    Last time I watched FF [1], they peaked out at around 140-150 mph
    which is seriously impressive and exhilarating for cars of their size
    but nothing remotely close to F1 except in your inflated imagination.


    [Leinster Trophy at Mondello Park outside Dublin a few years ago. By coincidence, Derek Warwick did an exhibition drive in a Jordan F1 car
    so the comparison was there in plain sight :) ]


    :-)
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Nov 3 05:58:09 2020
    On 2020-11-03 5:28 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:55:13 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-02 8:26 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:00:29 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-31 2:14 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:29:14 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is
    largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly >>>>>>> would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car.

    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where >>>>>>> Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he >>>>>>> could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points >>>>>>> behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes >>>>>>> this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport, >>>>>>> which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the >>>>>>> team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to >>>>>>> deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same >>>>>>> applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably >>>>>>> more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built >>>>>>> up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant >>>>>>> eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant >>>>>>> forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing >>>>>>> now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know >>>>>>> in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends >>>>>>> ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in >>>>>> that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny"

    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done >>>>>> almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my >>>>>> class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    Wow, putting yourself on a par with that list is something special,, >>>>> even for someone with your level of egotism.

    Nope. I said I'm in "good company".

    That in no way implies I think I'm on par with any of them.

    Like most egotists, you can't see your own egotism in describing
    yourself in the company of drivers who have all moved well beyond
    puttering around in lesser cars.

    Nope. I'm pointing out that those supposedly "lesser cars" were and are
    a very important class for developing race drivers.

    By no means am I trying to suggest that I'm am on par with any of them.




    Just pointing out that your implications about the class are complete
    and utter bullshit.

    I am faster around Mission than the 2015 US amateur champion, though. So >>>> whatever I'm doing, it's hardly "puttering". You should watch some FF
    some time. You'll see some real racing.
    Nothing to say?

    Tell me: how fast do you think my "puttering" little car goes?

    Last time I watched FF [1], they peaked out at around 140-150 mph
    which is seriously impressive and exhilarating for cars of their size
    but nothing remotely close to F1 except in your inflated imagination.


    [Leinster Trophy at Mondello Park outside Dublin a few years ago. By coincidence, Derek Warwick did an exhibition drive in a Jordan F1 car
    so the comparison was there in plain sight :) ]

    And it's only in the limited understanding of no-nothings like you that
    thinks that top speed is important in how difficult it is to drive at
    the limit.

    When people learn I drive a racing car of some kind, the first question
    they ask is almost universally, "How fast do you go?"...

    ...and it is utterly irrelevant.

    Going at the fastest speeds is the EASIEST THING you do in a racing car.

    <https://www.google.com/maps/@49.1254618,-122.3227786,168m/data=!3m1!1e3>

    That's turn 8-9 of our track; not the extra corners in the upper left,
    but the bit in the bottom centre of the window that has the Google
    street view overlay that then turns counter-clockwise to join the drag
    strip which becomes our main straight, there's a rectangular patch in
    the asphalt in the "straight" between 8 and 9 (you actually take it as
    one big sweeper). When you pass that patch of asphalt in an FF, you're
    doing about 60mph. And if you want to do a fast lap, it's where your
    foot needs to be flat to the floor; there, or even a little earlier as
    you pass the apex of turn 8.

    The hard part in racingrCothe part that takes talent and ballsrCoisn't doing the 110mph at the end the straight (our main straight isn't very long).
    Any idiot... ...even you... ...could drive a race car at full speed on a straight.

    No, the hard part is doing 1 or 2mph more at the beginning of the
    straight (so you get to 110 instead of 108). because you put your foot
    down on the accelerator while doing 60mph and still pointing directly at
    the concrete wall that is only 200 feet in front of you.

    The challenge for FF and F1 drivers alike is the SAME:

    Go as fast in to a corner as you can by braking as late as you can.

    Carry as much speed as you can through the middle of the corner.

    Get on the accelerator as early as you can.

    Do that, and your top speed is just an outcome.

    That's why a lot of F1 drivers came through FF. Driving without
    downforce is a great teacher for getting the most out of a car.

    There was a hilarious (but frustrating) period at our track where one
    guy was racing in the same group as the FFs in an F1000: 1000cc bike
    engines in a tube frame chassis similar to ours, but with big tires,
    wings and full diffusers. For perspective, the lap record for FF is
    1:10.533 (my best is 1:10.833; second best time ever at Mission) and an
    F1000 holds the outright record at 1:04.280.

    Only the guy I'm talking about couldn't come CLOSE to that time. If you
    want to know what "puttering" looks like, it's the guy who has an F1000
    with all that downforce, AND stickier tires, who is SLOWER through the
    corners than a decent FF.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Nov 3 19:31:57 2020
    On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 05:58:09 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-03 5:28 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:55:13 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-02 8:26 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:00:29 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-31 2:14 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:29:14 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is >>>>>>>> largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly >>>>>>>> would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car. >>>>>>>>
    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where >>>>>>>> Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he >>>>>>>> could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points >>>>>>>> behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes >>>>>>>> this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport, >>>>>>>> which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the >>>>>>>> team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to >>>>>>>> deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same >>>>>>>> applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably >>>>>>>> more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built >>>>>>>> up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant >>>>>>>> eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant >>>>>>>> forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing >>>>>>>> now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know >>>>>>>> in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends >>>>>>>> ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in >>>>>>> that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny"

    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done >>>>>>> almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my >>>>>>> class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    Wow, putting yourself on a par with that list is something special,, >>>>>> even for someone with your level of egotism.

    Nope. I said I'm in "good company".

    That in no way implies I think I'm on par with any of them.

    Like most egotists, you can't see your own egotism in describing
    yourself in the company of drivers who have all moved well beyond
    puttering around in lesser cars.

    Nope. I'm pointing out that those supposedly "lesser cars" were and are
    a very important class for developing race drivers.

    By no means am I trying to suggest that I'm am on par with any of them.




    Just pointing out that your implications about the class are complete >>>>> and utter bullshit.

    I am faster around Mission than the 2015 US amateur champion, though. So >>>>> whatever I'm doing, it's hardly "puttering". You should watch some FF >>>>> some time. You'll see some real racing.
    Nothing to say?

    Tell me: how fast do you think my "puttering" little car goes?

    Last time I watched FF [1], they peaked out at around 140-150 mph
    which is seriously impressive and exhilarating for cars of their size
    but nothing remotely close to F1 except in your inflated imagination.


    [Leinster Trophy at Mondello Park outside Dublin a few years ago. By
    coincidence, Derek Warwick did an exhibition drive in a Jordan F1 car
    so the comparison was there in plain sight :) ]

    And it's only in the limited understanding of no-nothings like you that >thinks that top speed is important in how difficult it is to drive at
    the limit.

    So why did you ask me if I know how fast your little car goes?


    When people learn I drive a racing car of some kind, the first question
    they ask is almost universally, "How fast do you go?"...

    ...and it is utterly irrelevant.

    So why did you ask me if I know how fast your little car goes?


    [snip Alan blowing his trumpet]
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Nov 3 11:57:02 2020
    On 2020-11-03 11:31 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 05:58:09 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-03 5:28 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:55:13 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-02 8:26 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 07:00:29 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-31 2:14 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 09:29:14 -0700, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-10-28 8:18 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 01:16:44 -0700 (PDT), Colin Stone
    <crmstone@gmail.com> wrote:

    But the innate feeling a driver has through his body to pick the optimum brake point and pressure, turn in at the perfect amount to keep the car balanced, and pick up the throttle to the limit of grip while avoiding wheel spinning on exits remain the same.

    Ayrton Senna showed this level of skill to mark himself out as a great in times gone by, and Max Verstappen is showing it now, too, albeit without the pressures of being in a title battle. But the consistency with which Hamilton delivers is what is just so impressive. He barely ever gets it wrong, when everybody around falters.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/54686292

    ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> "It's not just about his car

    Of course, there will be doubters who say Hamilton's success is >>>>>>>>> largely down to the car.

    Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>>>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014, and he certainly >>>>>>>>> would not be a six-going-on-seven-time champion in another car. >>>>>>>>>
    I do think, though, that he could have won titles for Ferrari where >>>>>>>>> Vettel faltered, and, who knows, perhaps in a Red Bull this year he >>>>>>>>> could be challenging as well. After all, Verstappen is only 17 points >>>>>>>>> behind Bottas in the standings, despite having a few reliability woes >>>>>>>>> this season.

    But being in the best car is what F1 is all about. It's a team sport, >>>>>>>>> which is focused almost entirely on the drivers, the lynchpins of the >>>>>>>>> team.

    For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to >>>>>>>>> deny, but think back to the other greats as well, because the same >>>>>>>>> applies.

    Senna's McLaren was a monster in the late 80s and early '90s, arguably
    more dominant than even Mercedes' 2020 masterpiece. Schumacher built >>>>>>>>> up his enormous records, by driving in another of Formula 1's dominant
    eras - the Ferrari team of the early 2000s.

    The best drivers find their way to the best cars and become dominant >>>>>>>>> forces. It is what we have seen before and it is what we are seeing >>>>>>>>> now."

    ----------------------------------------------------

    But then again, what would an actual F1 driver like Jolyon Palmer know
    in comparison to someone who putters around in lesser cars at weekends
    ;)

    But then again, you ignore what the importance of the word "just" is in
    that sentence, don't you? As you also ignore this:

    "Undoubtedly Hamilton would not have broken Schumacher's record if he >>>>>>>> had been driving anything but a Mercedes since 2014"

    And this:

    "But being in the best car is what F1 is all about."

    And this:

    "For those saying Hamilton has only won in the best car, it is hard to deny"

    He is saying that: "Yes: Hamilton is driving the best car and has done >>>>>>>> almost all his winning in the best car of each season".

    As for "puttering around in lesser cars", I'll defend the honour of my >>>>>>>> class by pointing out a few others who also "puttered":

    Michael Andretti,
    Jenson Button
    David Coulthard
    Emerson Fittipaldi
    Mika Hakkinen
    Damon Hill
    Eddie Irvine
    Jan Magnussen
    Kevin Magnussen
    Nigel Mansell
    Roberto Moreno
    Michael Schumacher,
    Ayrton Senna,
    Gilles Villeneuve and his son Jacques

    Also:

    Patrick Carpentier,
    Alexandre Tagliani,
    Bertrand Godin,
    Claude Bourbonnais,
    Greg Moore,
    Paul Tracy
    Derek Daly
    Scott Dixon
    Mario Franchitti

    And I didn't even get to this page:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Formula_Ford_drivers&pagefrom=Munro%2C+James%0AJames+Munro+%28racing+driver%29#mw-pages>

    So I'll consider myself to be in pretty good company.

    Wow, putting yourself on a par with that list is something special,, >>>>>>> even for someone with your level of egotism.

    Nope. I said I'm in "good company".

    That in no way implies I think I'm on par with any of them.

    Like most egotists, you can't see your own egotism in describing
    yourself in the company of drivers who have all moved well beyond
    puttering around in lesser cars.

    Nope. I'm pointing out that those supposedly "lesser cars" were and are >>>> a very important class for developing race drivers.

    By no means am I trying to suggest that I'm am on par with any of them. >>>>



    Just pointing out that your implications about the class are complete >>>>>> and utter bullshit.

    I am faster around Mission than the 2015 US amateur champion, though. So >>>>>> whatever I'm doing, it's hardly "puttering". You should watch some FF >>>>>> some time. You'll see some real racing.
    Nothing to say?

    Tell me: how fast do you think my "puttering" little car goes?

    Last time I watched FF [1], they peaked out at around 140-150 mph
    which is seriously impressive and exhilarating for cars of their size
    but nothing remotely close to F1 except in your inflated imagination.


    [Leinster Trophy at Mondello Park outside Dublin a few years ago. By
    coincidence, Derek Warwick did an exhibition drive in a Jordan F1 car
    so the comparison was there in plain sight :) ]

    And it's only in the limited understanding of no-nothings like you that
    thinks that top speed is important in how difficult it is to drive at
    the limit.

    So why did you ask me if I know how fast your little car goes?

    To see if you understood anything at all about this game.

    And it turns out you don't.

    :-)



    When people learn I drive a racing car of some kind, the first question
    they ask is almost universally, "How fast do you go?"...

    ...and it is utterly irrelevant.

    So why did you ask me if I know how fast your little car goes?


    [snip Alan blowing his trumpet]

    I wasn't blowing my own trumpet, you twit.

    I was pointing out what is and what is not hard in real racing cars.

    Something you've demonstrated you know very little about.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From ~misfit~@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Nov 4 12:22:45 2020
    On 4/11/2020 8:31 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 05:58:09 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-03 5:28 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:55:13 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    <snipped>
    Tell me: how fast do you think my "puttering" little car goes?

    Last time I watched FF [1], they peaked out at around 140-150 mph
    which is seriously impressive and exhilarating for cars of their size
    but nothing remotely close to F1 except in your inflated imagination.


    [Leinster Trophy at Mondello Park outside Dublin a few years ago. By
    coincidence, Derek Warwick did an exhibition drive in a Jordan F1 car
    so the comparison was there in plain sight :) ]

    And it's only in the limited understanding of no-nothings like you that
    thinks that top speed is important in how difficult it is to drive at
    the limit.

    Irony Alert!!!!

    A know-nothing, while digging themselves into a deeper hole, calling someone else a "no-nothing".

    I gotta stop reading these desperate attention-seeking posts - or perhaps kill-filing both parties
    would fix it. Feeding trolls just encourages them. Even if you think you're putting them down it's
    still someone [anyone] talking to them, giving them the attention they just can't get in real life.
    They'll just keep coming back for more. (I know, more irony.)

    So why did you ask me if I know how fast your little car goes?


    When people learn I drive a racing car of some kind, the first question
    they ask is almost universally, "How fast do you go?"...

    ...and it is utterly irrelevant.

    So why did you ask me if I know how fast your little car goes?


    [snip Alan blowing his trumpet]

    --
    Shaun.

    "Humans will have advanced a long, long way when religious belief has a cozy little classification
    in the DSM"
    David Melville

    This is not an email and hasn't been checked for viruses by any half-arsed self-promoting software.
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Alan Baker@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Nov 3 16:31:03 2020
    On 2020-11-03 3:22 p.m., ~misfit~ wrote:
    On 4/11/2020 8:31 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 05:58:09 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-03 5:28 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:55:13 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    <snipped>
    Tell me: how fast do you think my "puttering" little car goes?

    Last time I watched FF [1], they peaked out at around 140-150 mph
    which is seriously impressive and exhilarating for cars of their size
    but nothing remotely close to F1 except in your inflated imagination.


    [Leinster Trophy at Mondello Park outside Dublin a few years ago. By
    coincidence, Derek Warwick did an exhibition drive in a Jordan F1 car
    so the comparison was there in plain sight :) ]

    And it's only in the limited understanding of no-nothings like you that
    thinks that top speed is important in how difficult it is to drive at
    the limit.

    Irony Alert!!!!

    A know-nothing, while digging themselves into a deeper hole, calling
    someone else a "no-nothing".

    I gotta stop reading these desperate attention-seeking posts - or
    perhaps kill-filing both parties would fix it. Feeding trolls just encourages them. Even if you think you're putting them down it's still someone [anyone] talking to them, giving them the attention they just
    can't get in real life. They'll just keep coming back for more. (I know, more irony.)

    Oh, know!

    I maid a typo when my fingers were on automatic pilot!

    How WILL I stand the shame????
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Nov 3 18:32:07 2020
    On Tuesday, November 3, 2020 at 4:22:48 PM UTC-7, ~misfit~ wrote:

    I gotta stop reading these desperate attention-seeking posts - or perhaps kill-filing both parties
    would fix it.

    lol
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Tue Nov 3 20:47:29 2020
    On Tuesday, November 3, 2020 at 4:22:48 PM UTC-7, ~misfit~ wrote:

    or perhaps kill-filing both parties
    would fix it.

    fix your fucking life first
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From Martin Harran@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Nov 5 08:33:27 2020
    On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:22:45 +1300, ~misfit~
    <shaun.at.pukekohe@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 4/11/2020 8:31 am, Martin Harran wrote:
    On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 05:58:09 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:

    On 2020-11-03 5:28 a.m., Martin Harran wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:55:13 -0800, Alan Baker
    <notonyourlife@no.no.no.no> wrote:
    <snipped>
    Tell me: how fast do you think my "puttering" little car goes?

    Last time I watched FF [1], they peaked out at around 140-150 mph
    which is seriously impressive and exhilarating for cars of their size
    but nothing remotely close to F1 except in your inflated imagination.


    [Leinster Trophy at Mondello Park outside Dublin a few years ago. By
    coincidence, Derek Warwick did an exhibition drive in a Jordan F1 car
    so the comparison was there in plain sight :) ]

    And it's only in the limited understanding of no-nothings like you that
    thinks that top speed is important in how difficult it is to drive at
    the limit.

    Irony Alert!!!!

    A know-nothing, while digging themselves into a deeper hole, calling someone else a "no-nothing".

    I gotta stop reading these desperate attention-seeking posts - or perhaps kill-filing both parties
    would fix it. Feeding trolls just encourages them. Even if you think you're putting them down it's
    still someone [anyone] talking to them, giving them the attention they just can't get in real life.
    They'll just keep coming back for more. (I know, more irony.)

    It sounds like my inability to resist baiting Alan is matched by your
    inability to watch me doing it - we both suffer from the "can't stop
    looking at the car wreck" syndrome ;)

    Anyway, I've had enough in this thread, I don't think he could tie
    himself in any worse knots than he already has!


    So why did you ask me if I know how fast your little car goes?


    When people learn I drive a racing car of some kind, the first question
    they ask is almost universally, "How fast do you go?"...

    ...and it is utterly irrelevant.

    So why did you ask me if I know how fast your little car goes?


    [snip Alan blowing his trumpet]
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)
  • From texas gate@24:150/2 to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Nov 5 09:10:55 2020
    On Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 1:33:32 AM UTC-7, Martin Harran wrote:

    It sounds like my inability to resist baiting Alan is matched by your inability to watch me doing it - we both suffer from the "can't stop
    looking at the car wreck" syndrome ;)

    Anyway, I've had enough in this thread, I don't think he could tie
    himself in any worse knots than he already has!

    Thanks Harry Martin
    --- SBBSecho 3.06-Win32
    * Origin: SportNet Gateway Site (24:150/2)