• תא ףולשל ךרטצא ,ןוכנ הז תא אטבל ידכ

    From Maurice Kinal@1:153/7001.2989 to Uncle Bob on Sat Mar 2 19:28:40 2024
    Hey Uncle Bob!

    Apologies to all Hebrew speaking peoples but in defence of the Subject line at least it strips off the end of the line and then space pads it to 71 bytes so the it reads right to left which is correct ... or so I think. We'll soon enough find out.

    For the record I think this sucks.

    Life is good,
    Maurice

    o- o- o- -o -o o- -o -o -o o- o- -o o- -o o- -o /) /) /) (\ (\ /) (\ (\ (\ /) /) (\ /) (\ /) (\ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ... Fidonet 4K - You load sixteen penguins and what do you get?
    --- GNU bash, version 5.2.26(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: One of us @ (1:153/7001.2989)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.59 to Maurice Kinal on Sat Mar 2 19:12:33 2024
    On 02 Mar. 2024 19:28, you wrote to Uncle:
    Hey Uncle Bob!

    Apologies to all Hebrew speaking peoples but in defence of the Subject line at least it strips off the end of the line and then space pads it to 71 bytes so the it reads right to left which is correct ... or so I think. We'll soon enough find out.

    For the record I think this sucks.

    So.. you're saying the 80char limit sucks?


    --- AfterShock/Android 1.7.5
    * Origin: Mobile Pixel 3aXL (2:221/1.59)
  • From Maurice Kinal@1:153/7001.2989 to August Abolins on Sun Mar 3 00:53:27 2024
    Hey August!

    So.. you're saying the 80char limit sucks?

    No.

    However CP437 obviosuly sucks no matter how many characters. You can keep it.

    Life is good,
    Maurice

    -o o- o- -o -o -o -o -o o- o- -o -o -o -o -o -o
    (\ /) /) (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ /) /) (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\
    ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ... Fidonet 4K - You load sixteen penguins and what do you get?
    --- GNU bash, version 5.2.26(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: One of us @ (1:153/7001.2989)
  • From Maurice Kinal@2:280/464.113 to Maurice Kinal on Sat Mar 2 19:41:59 2024
    Hej Maurice!

    strips off the end of the line and then space pads it to 71 bytes

    To make it easier we could have just stripped out 71 bytes instead of preserving whole words but where is the fun in that? Also vim claims to be able to deal with right to left languages but then that would be a less generic solution.

    We'll soon enough find out.

    Looks good from this perspective.

    For the record I think this sucks.

    Amen brother. Keep the faith.

    Het leven is goed,
    Maurice

    -o -o -o o-
    (\ (\ (\ /)
    ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
    ... Fidonet 1080p - De vier pinguïns van de Apocalyps
    --- GNU bash, version 5.2.26(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint @ (2:280/464.113)
  • From Nicholas Boel@1:154/10 to Maurice Kinal on Sat Mar 2 21:55:04 2024
    On Sat, 2 Mar 2024 19:28:40 GMT, Maurice Kinal -> Uncle Bob wrote:

    Hey Uncle Bob!

    Apologies to all Hebrew speaking peoples but in defence of the Subject line at least it strips off the end of the line and then space pads it
    to 71 bytes so the it reads right to left which is correct ... or so I think. We'll soon enough find out.

    For the record I think this sucks.

    As far as I can tell, all looks good. I just don't know how this type of
    FTN software will send it back to you. :)

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... "Take my advice, I don't use it anyway."
    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
  • From Maurice Kinal@1:153/7001 to Nicholas Boel on Sun Mar 3 04:02:38 2024
    Hey Nicholas!

    As far as I can tell, all looks good. I just don't know how this
    type of FTN software will send it back to you. :)

    It looks good here. If it added a "Re: ", like some so-called FTN software does, then it would have stripped bytes from the rightmost which in this case is wrong since the rightmost is the beginning not the end. I believe the "Re: " thingy is a QWK standard and not really a FTN standard that I am aware of. I could be wrong about this but I don't believe so.

    Bottomline is your software can properly handle utf-8 codes no matter where (msg_header in this case) or the msg_body. You have my seal of approval ... for what it's worth. :-)

    Life is good,
    Maurice

    -o -o -o o- -o -o o- -o o- o- o- o- o- o- o- o-
    (\ (\ (\ /) (\ (\ /) (\ /) /) /) /) /) /) /) /)
    ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ... Wea bið wundrum clibbor. Wolcnu scriðað.
    Sorrow is strangely clinging. Clouds glide on.
    --- GNU bash, version 5.2.26(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
  • From Maurice Kinal@2:280/464.113 to Maurice Kinal on Sun Mar 3 04:42:23 2024
    Hej Maurice!

    It looks good here.

    Almost perfect. It stripped out the leading spaces that ensured proper word wrapping for 72 byte utf-8 strings for right-to-left languages such as Hebrew. Other than that it faithly reproduced the sent Subject.

    Should we carry on or have we seen enough?

    Het leven is goed,
    Maurice

    o- -o -o o-
    /) (\ (\ /)
    ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
    ... Fidonet 1080p - De vier pinguïns van de Apocalyps
    --- GNU bash, version 5.2.26(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint @ (2:280/464.113)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/6 to Maurice Kinal on Sun Mar 3 11:47:50 2024
    On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 04:42:22 GMT
    "Maurice Kinal -> Maurice Kinal" <113@464.280.2> wrote:

    Should we carry on or have we seen enough?

    Sylpheed seems to add the Re: and thus cuts off the text at the beginning of the subject. I don't see where the Re: can be disabled. Personally, I don't like the addition of Re:

    As per your question, I think we've seen enough. People who prefer to communicate in Hebrew would simply use the tools that handle it properly, such as systems that support FTN<->nntp+utf8

    Wrt to the subject line, users would quickly learn to keep the subject line short.

    So.. the fault is not FTN per se. FTN was built to support an English-speaking community. And as you have discovered, just supporting utf-8 is not enough espectially if the the requirement is to support languages that typically require writing/reading right-to-left.

    ---
    * Origin: news://news.fidonet.fi (2:221/6.0)
  • From Maurice Kinal@1:153/7001.2989 to August Abolins on Sun Mar 3 10:03:05 2024
    Hey August!

    I think we've seen enough.

    Agreed.

    Life is good,
    Maurice

    o- -o o- -o o- -o -o -o -o o- -o o- -o -o o- -o /) (\ /) (\ /) (\ (\ (\ (\ /) (\ /) (\ (\ /) (\ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ... Fidonet 4K - Sweet Sixteen Penguins of the Apocalypse.
    --- GNU bash, version 5.2.26(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: One of us @ (1:153/7001.2989)
  • From Nicholas Boel@1:154/10 to Maurice Kinal on Sun Mar 3 08:59:10 2024
    On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 04:02:38 GMT, Maurice Kinal -> Nicholas Boel wrote:

    It looks good here. If it added a "Re: ", like some so-called FTN software does, then it would have stripped bytes from the rightmost
    which in this case is wrong since the rightmost is the beginning not the end. I believe the "Re: " thingy is a QWK standard and not really a FTN standard that I am aware of. I could be wrong about this but I don't believe so.

    I'm not sure where it's a standard, but it changes the original subject/message, which I don't think is a good thing in any case. Most
    software I use here has an option to add or not add "Re: ", and I
    disable it everywhere.

    Bottomline is your software can properly handle utf-8 codes no matter where (msg_header in this case) or the msg_body. You have my seal of approval ... for what it's worth. :-)

    Worth every penny. ;)

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... "Take my advice, I don't use it anyway."
    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
  • From Nicholas Boel@1:154/10 to August Abolins on Sun Mar 3 09:02:14 2024
    On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 17:47:50 +0200, August Abolins -> Maurice Kinal wrote:

    Sylpheed seems to add the Re: and thus cuts off the text at the
    beginning of the subject. I don't see where the Re: can be disabled. Personally, I don't like the addition of Re:

    I don't think it's Sylpheed that adds that. There is an option in your smapinntpd.config "nostripre" or something like that. Change that
    setting and "Re: " won't be added to replies.

    So.. the fault is not FTN per se. FTN was built to support an English-speaking community. And as you have discovered, just supporting utf-8 is not enough espectially if the the requirement is to support languages that typically require writing/reading right-to-left.

    But it's kind of satisfying when you can do what wasn't meant to be
    done. Isn't it? ;)

    Regards,
    Nick

    ... "Take my advice, I don't use it anyway."
    --- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderb
    * Origin: _thePharcyde distribution system (Wisconsin) (1:154/10)
  • From Maurice Kinal@1:153/7001 to Nicholas Boel on Sun Mar 3 17:19:45 2024
    Hey Nicholas!

    Worth every penny. ;)

    For sure.

    But it's kind of satisfying when you can do what wasn't meant to
    be done. Isn't it? ;)

    From Rolling Stones "Saint of Me";

    Augustine knew temptation
    He loved women, wine, and song
    And all the special pleasures
    Of doing something wrong

    Life is good,
    Maurice

    -o -o o- o- -o -o -o -o -o -o -o o- o- o- o- o-
    (\ (\ /) /) (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ /) /) /) /) /)
    ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ... Wes þu þinum yldrum arfæst symle, fægerwyrde.
    Be respectful to your elders always, speaking fair words.
    --- GNU bash, version 5.2.26(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)