• Re: Hegseth cracks down on be

    From Rug Rat@1:135/250 to Mike Powell on Sat Oct 4 12:35:32 2025
    Moving the DoDN into the cloud, removing privacy act training, downplaying Cyber Security Training amoungst the active duty, GS, and contractor componate.

    What could go wrong?!

    Rug Rat (Brent Hendricks)
    Blog and Forums - www.catracing.org
    IMAGE BBS! 3.0 - bbs.catracing.org 6400
    C-Net Amiga BBS - bbs.catracing.org 6840
    --- CNet/5
    * Origin: The Rat's Den BBS (1:135/250)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to All on Sat Oct 4 08:54:25 2025
    US Department of War reduces cybersecurity training, tells soldiers to focus
    on their mission

    Date:
    Fri, 03 Oct 2025 14:32:00 +0000

    Description:
    Hegseth cracks down on beards, but relaxes cybersecurity requirements.

    FULL STORY

    A newly circulated memo from the US Government's Department of War (otherwise known as the Department of Defense) has actioned the relaxing of
    cybersecurity training, despite cracking down on shaving waivers and physical appearance.

    "The Department of War is committed to enabling our warfighters to focus on their core mission of fighting and winning our Nation's wars without distraction," the memo confirms. "Mandatory Department training will be directly linked to warfighting or otherwise be consolidated, reduced in frequency, or eliminated."

    The memo also calls for military departments to automate information
    management systems to eliminate training requirements, as well as reducing
    the frequency of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) training.

    Training reduction

    The US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth argued when personnel are not training
    on the mission, the military is less prepared for preventing war in future -
    a possibly short-sighted view considering the US Air Force is currently investigating a data breach thought to have been carried out by Chinese
    threat actors.

    Alongside the relaxation of training requirements, the Privacy Act Training
    is set to be removed from the Common Military Training list - which is
    perhaps not surprising given Hegseths rather colorful record with privacy
    rules .

    The move is also a change in direction from just a few weeks prior, when the DoD issued a strict new set of cybersecurity rules for potential contractors
    . These new regulations introduced three different compliance levels
    dependent on the sensitivity of the data they handle, and firms vying for contracts must be compliant in order to be selected.

    Cyberattacks and intrusions are perhaps more prolific than ever, with more
    and more of our daily lives becoming digital.

    Critical infrastructure sustained 13 attacks per second in 2023, and that number is only rising - and with human error still the primary intrusion
    point in the vast majority of cases, reducing cybersecurity training for
    anyone with links to national security is an incredibly risky move by the Defense Secretary.

    ======================================================================
    Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/pro/security/us-department-of-war-reduces-cybersecur ity-training-tells-soldiers-to-focus-on-their-mission

    $$
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Kevin Koch@1:105/420 to Rug Rat on Sat Oct 4 17:39:54 2025

    downplaying Cyber Security Training amoungst the active duty, GS, and contractor componate.

    What could go wrong?!


    Well I'm not the most wise person in cyber security yet ..To me
    it sounds like saying "check out my DNS Cache! "

    ... Drive not ready E: (R)etry (G)o to Impulse (C)all Geordi

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2024/05/29 (Linux/64)
    * Origin: 2o fOr beeRS bbS>>20ForBeers.com:1337 (1:105/420)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to RUG RAT on Sun Oct 5 09:36:53 2025
    Moving the DoDN into the cloud, removing privacy act training, downplaying Cyber Security Training amoungst the active duty, GS, and contractor componate

    What could go wrong?!

    A whole lot that I probably cannot even imagine.

    But what can we expect from one of the central figures in Signalgate? More
    of the same, it appears. :(

    Mike

    * SLMR 2.1a * "Did you open the Microwave door before the 'ding'"?
    --- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/700 to Mike Powell on Sun Oct 5 09:51:09 2025
    Mike Powell wrote to RUG RAT <=-

    What could go wrong?!

    A whole lot that I probably cannot even imagine.

    Hearing about soldiers posting on instagram and including EXIF info was
    just the start.

    I had a friend who posted an icbmto:latitude/Logitude UNC in his
    signature. Same effect.

    But what can we expect from one of the central figures in Signalgate?
    More of the same, it appears. :(

    Someone just shoulder surfed over one of our Department of War people
    writing on Signal about having the 82nd airborne parachute into
    Portland. Their Opsec is CLEAN, indeed.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)