• polls

    From Ogg@VERT/EOTLBBS to Digital Man on Mon Sep 14 12:51:57 2020
    On 29/08/2020 5:17 p.m., Digital Man wrote:

    1: Yes
    2: No
    3: Don't Care
    4: Not Religious


    hey did synchronet get updated to follow the twitlist for voting?

    Yes:
    http://cvs.synchro.net/commitlog.ssjs#42094

    Oh.. So, these things are a feature of Synchro? On their own
    they are quite vacuous: fav color, fav music, etc. Sheesh.

    Why not force a section in the poll to illuminate WHY this poll
    is being conducted, its relevance, or force the builder to
    provide some context.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Ogg on Mon Sep 14 12:43:43 2020
    Re: polls
    By: Ogg to Digital Man on Mon Sep 14 2020 12:51 pm

    Oh.. So, these things are a feature of Synchro? On their own
    they are quite vacuous: fav color, fav music, etc. Sheesh.

    Why not force a section in the poll to illuminate WHY this poll
    is being conducted, its relevance, or force the builder to
    provide some context.

    Would we really need to always provide context or a reason when creating a poll? This, and BBSing, is all for fun. Seems like it would be an unnecessary amount of control to have restrictions for doing something like creating a poll..

    Nightfox

    ---
    ■ Synchronet ■ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Ogg@VERT/EOTLBBS to Nightfox on Mon Sep 14 18:29:46 2020
    On 9/14/2020 3:43 PM, between "Nightfox":

    Would we really need to always provide context or a reason
    when creating a poll? This, and BBSing, is all for fun. Seems
    like it would be an unnecessary amount of control to have
    restrictions for doing something like creating a poll..

    You are exactly right: this is for fun. I was just suggesting a way to encourage an option to provide relevance or some context to the poll. "Force" was the wrong word.


    --

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com